Zone1 What's Not To Like?

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2008
Messages
131,875
Reaction score
67,673
Points
2,615
Location
Brooklyn, NY
1. I'm speaking of truth. I feel it to be kinda important in a leader, which is why I see a Trump presidency as valuable. Democrat lie about everything. I have regularly posted some 50 examples of Democrat lies and hoaxes. Best is never to take what Democrats or their media allies say without research.



2.Saul Alinsky wrote, and the Democrats follow:
This quote from Saul Alinsky (late communist) in "Rules for Radicals" relates so well to the democrat party today, "accuse your opponent of what you are doing, to create confusion and to inculcate voters against evidence of your own guilt."



3. Vice President JD Vance’s outlining of the Trump Doctrine at an Ohio event. Vance said:
Number one, you articulate a clear American interest and that’s, in this case, that Iran can’t have a nuclear weapon. Number two, you try to aggressively diplomatically solve that problem. And number three, when you can’t solve it diplomatically, you use overwhelming military power to solve it and then you get the hell out of there before it ever becomes a protracted conflict.




4. Hussein Obama:
March 6, 2012, press conference: "And what I have said is, is that we will not countenance Iran getting a nuclear weapon. My policy is not containment; my policy is to prevent them from getting a nuclear weapon -- because if they get a nuclear weapon that could trigger an arms race in the region, it would undermine our non-proliferation goals, it could potentially fall into the hands of terrorists.”

Then he guaranteed Iran nuclear weapons, guaranteed no inspections, sent them a pallet with $400 million in cash, and released another $900 million to them.....and his puppet, Biden, removed sanctions that forbid them selling oil to China.

Democrats lie about everything.






5. Remember how Obama showed the world that Democrats lie about everything?
"WASHINGTON — Former Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel has become the latest former member of President Obama’s cabinet to fire a missile at his old boss, saying the president’s 2013 decision to ignore his own “red line” on Syrian military action “hurt the credibility” of Mr. Obama’s word around the world.
...Obama had said the use of chemical weapons by the Assad government would trigger a military response by the United States. ..... he did not follow through after Mr. Assad killed hundreds of civilians with such weapons.
...... still heard complaints to this day from foreign leaders about Mr. Obama’s about-face. “A president’s word is a big thing, and when the president says things, that’s a big deal,” he said.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/19/u...ce-on-syria-hurt-obamas-credibility.html?_r=0




When Democrats lie......who ya' gonna call.....ghost busters?????
 
4. Hussein Obama:
March 6, 2012, press conference: "And what I have said is, is that we will not countenance Iran getting a nuclear weapon. My policy is not containment; my policy is to prevent them from getting a nuclear weapon -- because if they get a nuclear weapon that could trigger an arms race in the region, it would undermine our non-proliferation goals, it could potentially fall into the hands of terrorists.”
Now, more than ever before, Iran doesn't need a nuclear weapon. Iran, Russia, and China are secure with their nuclear defense against US aggression and have moved on to establishing conventional weapons superiority.

Think it out Chic. If the US or the Zionists attempt to use nuclear weapons against any of their perceived enemies, nuclear war will be upon us all.

If you need to reply then politely please. Nothing else will be tolerated! You can just remember that this is my opinion.
 
3. Vice President JD Vance’s outlining of the Trump Doctrine at an Ohio event. Vance said:

Did he have a big "Mission Accomplished" sign behind him?

4. Hussein Obama:
March 6, 2012, press conference: "And what I have said is, is that we will not countenance Iran getting a nuclear weapon. My policy is not containment; my policy is to prevent them from getting a nuclear weapon -- because if they get a nuclear weapon that could trigger an arms race in the region, it would undermine our non-proliferation goals, it could potentially fall into the hands of terrorists.”

Then he guaranteed Iran nuclear weapons, guaranteed no inspections, sent them a pallet with $400 million in cash, and released another $900 million to them.....and his puppet, Biden, removed sanctions that forbid them selling oil to China.

Democrats lie about everything.
2. Saul Alinsky wrote, and you follow:
This quote from Saul Alinsky (late communist) in "Rules for Radicals" relates so well to you, "accuse your opponent of what you are doing"

5. Remember how Obama showed the world that Democrats lie about everything?
"WASHINGTON — Former Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel has become the latest former member of President Obama’s cabinet to fire a missile at his old boss, saying the president’s 2013 decision to ignore his own “red line” on Syrian military action “hurt the credibility” of Mr. Obama’s word around the world.
...Obama had said the use of chemical weapons by the Assad government would trigger a military response by the United States. ..... he did not follow through after Mr. Assad killed hundreds of civilians with such weapons.
...... still heard complaints to this day from foreign leaders about Mr. Obama’s about-face. “A president’s word is a big thing, and when the president says things, that’s a big deal,” he said.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/19/u...ce-on-syria-hurt-obamas-credibility.html?_r=0
Maybe Obama was just kidding like when Donny said he'd end the Ukraine conflict in 24 hours.
 
Now, more than ever before, Iran doesn't need a nuclear weapon. Iran, Russia, and China are secure with their nuclear defense against US aggression and have moved on to establishing conventional weapons superiority.

Think it out Chic. If the US or the Zionists attempt to use nuclear weapons against any of their perceived enemies, nuclear war will be upon us all.

If you need to reply then politely please. Nothing else will be tolerated! You can just remember that this is my opinion.
What US aggression?

Of course you are as usual, full of offal as a sock is full of foot: the "war" revealed the superiority of US military equipment, as Israel took supremacy of the skies in hours over the Soviet vaunted air defenses.

What do you mean by "Zionists"?

Israel has had nuclear weapons for half a century.



You should worry.....Canada has relied on US defense forever.
 
Did he have a big "Mission Accomplished" sign behind him?


2. Saul Alinsky wrote, and you follow:
This quote from Saul Alinsky (late communist) in "Rules for Radicals" relates so well to you, "accuse your opponent of what you are doing"


Maybe Obama was just kidding like when Donny said he'd end the Ukraine conflict in 24 hours.


Beat it Vermin.


You shouldn't have made up lies about me.

Don't infect my threads.
 
What US aggression?

Of course you are as usual, full of offal as a sock is full of foot: the "war" revealed the superiority of US military equipment, as Israel took supremacy of the skies in hours over the Soviet vaunted air defenses.
That's your typical spam and it's a waste of your effort on me.
(final warning) (no appropriate adult behaviour and no discussion with me)
What do you mean by "Zionists"?
We don't blame all Israeli Jews, we blame Zionists. You'll find the term's meaning on the net.
Israel has had nuclear weapons for half a century.
That's popular opinion but I could give you an answer on why it may not be true.

In any case, it's now of minimal importance and not a reason for Iran to seek same. In fact, other than the superpowers, their proxies having nukes migh put them at greater risk, should one of the superpowers choose to use their nuclear weapons.
You should worry.....Canada has relied on US defense forever.
 
That's your typical spam and it's a waste of your effort on me.
(final warning) (no appropriate adult behaviour and no discussion with me)

We don't blame all Israeli Jews, we blame Zionists. You'll find the term's meaning on the net.

That's popular opinion but I could give you an answer on why it may not be true.

In any case, it's now of minimal importance and not a reason for Iran to seek same. In fact, other than the superpowers, their proxies having nukes migh put them at greater risk, should one of the superpowers choose to use their nuclear weapons.
" no discussion with me"


I don't know if I can bear it, but I will give it my best efforts
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom