Lastamender
Diamond Member
- Dec 28, 2011
- 65,087
- 59,277
- 3,600
That looks like fact not a conspiracy. How does it look when evidence is ignored? It looks like the conspiracy is the denial of fraud to me.
"A company spokesperson, Katina Granger, said the problem was caused by “human error.”
I like this excuse.
“It was a human error, based on someone from our team that programmed the election,” Bennett responded when asked by a reporter why the voting machines had errors.
“They made a mistake putting the printed text on the card as opposed to the screen,” she continued.
“Someone from our team inadvertently put the wrong name.”
Right.
slaynews.com
"A company spokesperson, Katina Granger, said the problem was caused by “human error.”
I like this excuse.
“It was a human error, based on someone from our team that programmed the election,” Bennett responded when asked by a reporter why the voting machines had errors.
“They made a mistake putting the printed text on the card as opposed to the screen,” she continued.
“Someone from our team inadvertently put the wrong name.”
Right.

Voting Machine Company That 'Flipped' Votes in Pennsylvania Admits 'Someone Programmed the Election' - Slay News
A top executive from the company behind the voting machines that "flipped votes" in Pennsylvania on Tuesday has admitted that "someone from our team programmed the election."
