...So your concern is that having a discussion about the ethical nature of our foreign policy gives "aid and comfort" to the enemy (terrorists) even though the discussion revolves around the government's funding, training and logistical support of the enemy (terrorists)...
Nope.
I'm all for having a rational and open discussion.
I'm NOT in favor of publicly declaring ourselves to be a SPONSOR of terrorism and publicly condemning ourselves as an operating premise, as we see in the OP.
That serves to weaken public resolve and unduly influences the simple-minded against preemptive operations, amongst who cannot see the forest for the trees.
That, in turn, provides aid and comfort to the enemy.
...Do you have any personal moral principles that you live by, or do you acquiesce everything to the State?...
Yes. I do, indeed, have serviceable and personal moral principles that I live by. Unlike most dedicated Leftists and other Moral Relativists and Fifth Columnists who weaken us.
...For many, patriotism is like a religion, requiring a level of blind obedience or faith in the righteousness of the cause. In the case of American patriotism, the religion is more akin to the teachings of Mohammad than those of Jesus...
Spare us the recess-yard amateur-hour psychobabble.
...Conquering foreign lands is the accepted practice in America.
And it should not be.
That is where public discussion comes in.
Not public self-effacement and condemnation to the point where we give aid and comfort to the enemy.
