Unquestionably in violation

Crepitus

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2018
Messages
93,760
Reaction score
133,870
Points
3,615

Judge says US government didn’t follow court order on deportations


In an emergency hearing he called to address reports that immigrants had been sent to South Sudan, Judge Brian E. Murphy in Boston said the eight migrants aboard the plane were not given a meaningful opportunity to object that the deportation could put them in danger. Minutes before the hearing, administration officials accused “activist judges” of advocating the release of dangerous criminals.

“The department actions in this case are unquestionably in violation of this court’s order,” Murphy said Wednesday, arguing that the deportees didn’t have “meaningful opportunity” to object to being sent to South Sudan. The group was flown out of the United States just hours after getting notice, leaving them no chance to contact lawyers who could object in court.

This is a clear and deliberate violation of a lawful and unambiguous court order.

There must be consequences to maintain the rule of law.

That "constitutional crisis" is getting closer and closer.
 

Judge says US government didn’t follow court order on deportations


In an emergency hearing he called to address reports that immigrants had been sent to South Sudan, Judge Brian E. Murphy in Boston said the eight migrants aboard the plane were not given a meaningful opportunity to object that the deportation could put them in danger. Minutes before the hearing, administration officials accused “activist judges” of advocating the release of dangerous criminals.

“The department actions in this case are unquestionably in violation of this court’s order,” Murphy said Wednesday, arguing that the deportees didn’t have “meaningful opportunity” to object to being sent to South Sudan. The group was flown out of the United States just hours after getting notice, leaving them no chance to contact lawyers who could object in court.


This is a clear and deliberate violation of a lawful and unambiguous court order.

There must be consequences to maintain the rule of law.

That "constitutional crisis" is getting closer and closer.
perhaps joe shouldn't have let them in
 

Judge says US government didn’t follow court order on deportations


In an emergency hearing he called to address reports that immigrants had been sent to South Sudan, Judge Brian E. Murphy in Boston said the eight migrants aboard the plane were not given a meaningful opportunity to object that the deportation could put them in danger. Minutes before the hearing, administration officials accused “activist judges” of advocating the release of dangerous criminals.

“The department actions in this case are unquestionably in violation of this court’s order,” Murphy said Wednesday, arguing that the deportees didn’t have “meaningful opportunity” to object to being sent to South Sudan. The group was flown out of the United States just hours after getting notice, leaving them no chance to contact lawyers who could object in court.


This is a clear and deliberate violation of a lawful and unambiguous court order.

There must be consequences to maintain the rule of law.

That "constitutional crisis" is getting closer and closer.
I think it just might already be here.
 

Judge says US government didn’t follow court order on deportations


In an emergency hearing he called to address reports that immigrants had been sent to South Sudan, Judge Brian E. Murphy in Boston said the eight migrants aboard the plane were not given a meaningful opportunity to object that the deportation could put them in danger. Minutes before the hearing, administration officials accused “activist judges” of advocating the release of dangerous criminals.

“The department actions in this case are unquestionably in violation of this court’s order,” Murphy said Wednesday, arguing that the deportees didn’t have “meaningful opportunity” to object to being sent to South Sudan. The group was flown out of the United States just hours after getting notice, leaving them no chance to contact lawyers who could object in court.


This is a clear and deliberate violation of a lawful and unambiguous court order.

There must be consequences to maintain the rule of law.

That "constitutional crisis" is getting closer and closer.
Did Anwar awlaki get a trial before he was assassinated by drone strike? What about his son?

Also, where do district judges get the power to tell Washington to do anything? Is this a power both sides have and wield?
 
Did Anwar awlaki get a trial before he was assassinated by drone strike? What about his son?

Also, where do district judges get the power to tell Washington to do anything? Is this a power both sides have and wield?
Absolutely irrelevant to the current situation.

Whataboutisms are just boring these days.
 
Absolutely irrelevant to the current situation.

Whataboutisms are just boring these days.


Figures.

This is what y'all always do. You will not answer questions.

Even if it's a reasonable one.
 
Argument: Activist judges should rule outside their jurisdiction for violent illegals to stay in this country… but expand no effort at all to prosecute the violent crimes of those illegals.

Counter argument:

IMG_4808.webp
 
Argument: Activist judges should rule outside their jurisdiction for violent illegals to stay in this country… but expand no effort at all to prosecute the violent crimes of those illegals.
BULLSHIT. They are prosecuting criminals as usual.
 
BULLSHIT. They are prosecuting criminals as usual.

These violent offenders, on bail, on warrants, waking the streets, committing further offences, known to be hear illegal and subject to detention and deportation are being prosecuted?

I would prefer you tell me a fairytale with a happy ending, thanks.
 
Back
Top Bottom