Understanding The Enemy: A Primer

[PoliticalChic]

1. Premise: the use of violence is less assumed if one can clearly articulate one's position, and prove its validity.



2. "2 Israeli Embassy staffers killed in 'act of terror' in Washington, DC
....a couple about to get engaged -- were gunned down outside an event at the Capital Jewish Museum in Washington, D.C., on Wednesday in what FBI Director Kash Patel called an "act of terror." The shooting has sparked outrage and has been condemned as an "unspeakable" act of antisemitism after officials said the suspect, who is in custody, shouted "free, free Palestine" following the shooting."

2 Israeli Embassy staffers killed in 'act of terror' in Washington, DC

A couple was shot and killed in Washington, D.C., on Wednesday, law enforcement officials confirmed.

abcnews.go.com

3. "Suspect in congressional shooting was Bernie Sanders supporter, strongly anti-Trump​

James T. Hodgkinson, the man identified as shooting a Republican member of congress and four others on Wednesday morning, was a small business owner in Illinois who defined himself publicly by his firm support of Bernie Sanders’ progressive politics – and his hatred of conservatives and President Donald Trump."

https://www.cnn.com/2017/06/14/homepage2/james-hodgkinson-profile

Actual event, and shootings by Democrat.




4. Historic review: every presidential assassin in the history of the nation has been a liberal/Democrat- or has not been associated with a political outlook- none were right-wingers.



5. So see Democrat "thinking" in microcosm, read the essay bt PhD candidate at George Mason, who endorses murdering those who disagree. This is the hallmark of their ideology.....censorship wasn't enough.

You've probably already read about Nicholas Decker's April 16 Substack essay titled "When Must We Kill Them?" so I won't go into all that again. Suffice it to say that anyone urging violence "as part of a coordinated strategy" against "the rot of the present administration [that] runs deeper than one man," then they've cast themselves far beyond the pale of civilized discourse."

pjmedia.com



And,.....in simpler terms:

The Scorpion and the Frog​

A scorpion lived in a dark and dingy cave near a mountain. He grew tired of his surroundings and wanted Lied a change. One day, he came out of his cave and noticed that the valley across the river was very green. He crawled up to the riverbank and wondered how to cross it. Suddenly, he noticed a frog leaping around. “Hello, Mr. Frog, would you carry me to the other side of the river?” asked the, but you scorpion. “I would have but you see I don’t trust scorpions,” replied the frog. “All scorpions are not bad. If I sting you on the way I will die for I do not know how to swim,” explained the scorpion. Now the frog saw enough reason in the scorpion’s statement and agreed to carry him across the river. So the scorpion hopped on to the frog’s back and they set out on the journey. The frog paddled his limbs through the water as fast as he could. Half way through the journey, he suddenly felt a sharp sting on his soft hide. “Why did you sting me? Now both of us shall drown,” cried he. “What can I do for this is my nature,” replied the unrepentant scorpion. The frog and the scorpion immediately drowned in the gushing water.




It's simply their nature.

 

[PoliticalChic]

A study of the history of society suggests that not all humans advance at the same rate, and that the more savage and atavistic of our fellow Homo sapien seem to have gravitated to a particular politicat party.

To blunt the spearhead of disagreement, let me remind that the French Revolution is what has spawned the Russian Revolution, the Nazi ideology, Mao's long march, and an identifyable similarity with the agenda of the Democrat Party.



During the French Revolution, the provenance of the Bolsheviks and the Nazis, and the Fascists, the elites claimed to be infused with the 'will of the people," the "general will."
“We must reason about all things,” and anyone who ‘refuses to seek out the truth’ thereby renounces his human nature and “should be treated by the rest of his species as a wild beast.” So, once ‘truth’ is determined, anyone who doesn’t accept it was “either insane or wicked and morally evil.” It is not the individual who has the “ right to decide about the nature of right and wrong,” but only “the human race,” expressed as the general will. Himmelfarb, “The Roads to Modernity,” p. 167-68

 

[luiza]

A great subject area OP and you do it proud, imho .

You are ripe for Miles Mathis who takes it even further .

In a nutshell there is basically nothing on the public screen that is not Fake /Hoax .

All carried out deliberately and set against a clear Strategy and series of Objectives .

After Miles you can then progress to Clif High and separately the Remote Viewers ( mostly retired CIA ) who define the top controllers and in a very unexpected and profound way .

Certainly not for simple souls and the Sheeple munching their fodder. .

 

[PoliticalChic]

And on the same theme, the theme of murder, one wonders why the single most important foreign policy aim of a previous Democrat President was to guarantee nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism......

Nor is that simply my opinion:

Iran Remains 'World's Worst State Sponsor Of Terrorism'​

Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty
https://www.rferl.org › u-s-state-department-iran-remai...
— U.S. State Department: Iran Remains 'World's Worst State Sponsor Of Terrorism' ... Nathan Sales, the U.S. State ...