Captain Creeper
Diamond Member
- Oct 13, 2025
- 2,565
- 2,958
- 1,903
Kristi Noem Out: Trump Picks Sen. Markwayne Mullin as Replacement
President Donald Trump will nominate Sen. Markwayne Mullin to replace Kristi Noem as chief of the Department of Homeland Security.
www.breitbart.com
More stealth bombers, which can carry nukes, are deploying. Trump speaks of "the BIG ONE". Trump demand unconditional surrender, which was last obtained by us about nuking Japan. Read the tea leaves. While not conclusive, of course, these may be signs that we are going to use nukes in Iran to compel a swift unconditional surrender from the fiends.
Would I place money on this? Probably not, at this time. However, Trump is a transformer. He is the new merchant of Hope and Change. Perhaps we should consider the positive aspects of nuking Iran. Here are a few.
1. It shows Russia that we are serious about using nuclear weapons and, therefore, they can stop throwing around nuclear threats when he has been too p*ssy to use them to date in any context. We used them in WWII, and we will do it again. Using then in Iran will solidify this and have Russia, and China, curled up in the fetal position embracing each other. The USA is THE NUCLEAR WARFARE GOD.
2. It will bring a quick end to the Iran war, with us as the victors. It will probably save lives on both sides.
3. Nukes can be safely deployed. Everyone is so scared of nuclear weapons. Its like how people are too scared to carry a Glock with a round chambered because there is no exterior safety. In reality, Glocks DO have safeties, and as long as you carry it right, you can carry with a round chambered as safely as you can any other firearm. The nuke default reaction of fear is programmed. Therefore, it can be unprogrammed. Just because we set off some nukes on Iran does not mean it has to be some sort of holocaust involving mass casualties. First, we can use tactical nukes quite effectively to hasten victory. Also, we can effect some high altitude air bursts to shock and awe the fiends while also creating an EMP that will disable everything electric they have. Can you imagine the effect this will have on those people?!? They will beg to surrender unconditionally. Plus, the high altitude bursts substantially reduce the fallout risk. Essentially, we blast a mega tonnage warhead over Tehran a few miles up, and thereby create a second sun in the sky that is far brighter than then one we have naturally. Then everything goes black (we will of course move to prevent any harm/disruption to our electronics due to the EMP. We are not even stationed near the Iranian border. We can select the proper size warhead to keep the EMP limited to a particular area).
4. Building on point no. 1, the use of nukes will cement us as the one true superpower in the world, which is worth trillions in shoring up our national security. As an aside, when everyone sees how was can deploy nuclear weapons in a relatively safe manner, I think we will experience a huge surge in interest in building nuclear reactors for civilian energy. That would be a definite win. We would enhance our energy capabilities, and the leftist twerps will be happy and reduced carb and stuff.
Hell, I am all-in for using nuclear weapons on Iran. It will be spectacular! I see only positive results in do so. Again, we do not have to use them in the same way we did in WWII. Times have changed and technology now affords us many, many options that did not exist at that time. In fact, we do not want to turn Iran into a glass parking lot. There are too many resources there (e.g., oil) that we can exploit to our own advantage). It would be against OUR national interest to do that. But that does not mean that we cannot strategically use nukes, even the big ones, to effect our will on the region.
