trump and the exploitation of ambiguity.

berg80

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2017
Messages
33,565
Reaction score
27,352
Points
2,820
Can Trump Just Do Whatever He Wants by Declaring Emergencies?

The United States is a nation in crisis, President Trump says. The problems are both profound and urgent. He knows how to fix them, but his ideas are hard to implement: They require new legislation or lumbering legal petitions. Luckily, there’s an easier way. The law often gives the president new and broad powers in a state of emergency.

So he has declared nearly a dozen. Trump says he can impose tariffs because he says it’s an emergency to contain trade deficits. He can deport immigrants without due process because it’s an emergency to fight a Venezuelan gang’s invasion. He can dispatch the National Guard to American cities like Los Angeles because it’s an emergency to quell protests and crime. He can ask the Supreme Court for emergency rulings on legal challenges to his authority because we can’t afford to wait for judges to debate his policies.

All this exposes a diabolical problem in our legal order: An emergency is in the eye of the beholder. Do these problems of debatable urgency demand an immediate response? The trade imbalance is generations old. Immigrants — even foreign gangs — are not an invading army. Protesters aren’t rebels. Crime has plunged nationwide, including in all of the cities Trump says need urgent protection. He could wait for courts to decide if he has the power to remake the government, as his predecessors generally have.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/04/briefing/trump-emergency-presidential-power.html

Towards the end of trump 1.0 I recall posting this article.

Repairing the Rule of Law: An Agenda for Post-Trump Reform
Repairing the Rule of Law: An Agenda for Post-Trump Reform

The author pointed out many ways in which the Founders and our legal system did not anticipate a prez like trump. Someone who sought out ways to take advantage of loopholes in the statutes governing the chief executive.

Of Trump’s many excesses, his assault on legal norms has to rank high in terms of damage to fundamental values that form the fabric of America. His attacks on the free press, the independent judiciary and the independence of the Department of Justice have all created significant damage. His abuse of executive discretionary authority has made a mockery of the concept of checks and balances. His gaming of the judicial system has revealed weaknesses in our legal process.

Now he's taken it a step further having discovered the declaration of emergencies is a door through which he can step so his control over......well.......just about everything, can be expanded. If we've learned anything about trump 2.0 it's that the expansion of power is paramount to implementing his agenda and part of his instinctive impulse to establish an autocracy. Translated to its real world effect the expansion of power has been by means of breaking the law.

Three times this week his actions have been ruled to be illegal, not counting the extrajudicial killing of 11 people off the coast of Venezuela. Trump has used 10 emergency declarations to justify hundreds of actions. He has discovered what he sees as a portal to authoritarian rule. It needs to be closed.
 
Biden was a total disaster and yes created emergencies. Now we are fixing the problems
 
Biden was a total disaster and yes created emergencies. Now we are fixing the problems
Dotard doesn't get to unilaterally decide what constitutes an emergency so he can expand the scope of his powers beyond that which the Constitution intended.
 
Dotard doesn't get to unilaterally decide what constitutes an emergency so he can expand the scope of his powers beyond that which the Constitution intended.
Apparently he can like crime in democrat cities
 
  • The Alien Enemies Act of 1798 empowers the president to quickly deport foreigners during a war or an invasion — but doesn’t say what an invasion is. The Homeland Security Department says it is battling an invasion by Tren de Aragua, a Venezuelan gang. An appeals court said this week that the administration isn’t using the law properly, though the government has already deported many people that way. The question is headed for the Supreme Court.

We aren't being invaded by a Venezuelan gang. That's a fantasy.
 
Back
Top Bottom