Transportation Secretary concerned about cost, timeline, DEI mandates

Dont Taz Me Bro

Diamond Member
Staff member
Senior USMB Moderator
Moderator
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2009
Messages
76,963
Reaction score
47,332
Points
2,645
Location
Las Vegas, Nevada
This is exactly the folly of ill thought policies like DEI. Making sure contractors are included based on immutable characteristics is not what's important here. What's important is fixing a piece of damaged transportation infrastructure within a reasonable time frame and cost to the taxpayers. Inflating costs or delaying completion in order to ensure the workers have the correct genitalia or skin pigmentation flies in the face of common sense.

"It's my hope that this letter from Secretary Duffy is a good-faith expression of concern about the cost of the bridge and not a retraction of the administration's commitment to the bridge," Representative Olszewski said. "Nothing in the letter suggested that they were planning to pull back their support. It seems to continue to be there, which we welcome."

On Secretary Duffy's concerns about DEI practices in hiring contractors, Olszewski told Hellgren, "I believe we can rebuild this bridge in a responsible way that also includes women and minority contractors."


 
If you believe in DEI, then knock youself out. Be the follower you are.

However, DEI PROGRAMS should be outlawed from the government.
 
If you believe in DEI, then knock youself out. Be the follower you are.

However, DEI PROGRAMS should be outlawed from the government.
DEI is being used for airline pilots and ATC.

That's not "knock yourself out", that's a direct threat to everyone's safety and very lives.
 
DEI is being used for airline pilots and ATC.

That's not "knock yourself out", that's a direct threat to everyone's safety and very lives.
Reread it and read it for comprehension.

You can believe in DEI. That is a First Amendment issue.

OUTLAWING from the Government is where the safety comes in. If DEI is outlawed in government, then ATC and Pilots will have to be hired on merit.
 
Reread it and read it for comprehension.

You can believe in DEI. That is a First Amendment issue.

OUTLAWING from the Government is where the safety comes in. If DEI is outlawed in government, then ATC and Pilots will have to be hired on merit.
I read it jut fine....Airlines aren't gubmint agencies, nor are a lot of other private operations like hospitals, with the lives of people in their hands.
 
I read it jut fine....Airlines aren't gubmint agencies, nor are a lot of other private operations like hospitals, with the lives of people in their hands.
Airlines are beholden to government regulation, just like ATC. They may be private entities, but they fall under the rubric of public safety. The left won't think so, but hiring on anything but merit is a public safety issue in this regard.

There is absolutely nothing the government can do to private companies in regard to DEI other than make sure they don't get any government contracting or funding.
 
Airlines are beholden to government regulation, just like ATC. They may be private entities, but they fall under the rubric of public safety. The left won't think so, but hiring on anything but merit is a public safety issue in this regard.

There is absolutely nothing the government can do to private companies in regard to DEI other than make sure they don't get any government contracting or funding.
"Beholden to regulations" doesn't make them a part of the gubmint.
 
DEI is being used for airline pilots and ATC.

That's not "knock yourself out", that's a direct threat to everyone's safety and very lives.
Off We Go Into the Wild Blueblood Yonder

So is hiring mediocre wannabes from the limited pool of those who had enough money to pay for pilot training. Like all our other top jobs, those who are forced to buy their jobs will make their passengers pay when they crash.
 
15th post
Back
Top Bottom