Time for SCOTUS to Reign In Lower Courts?

[jwoodie]

The idea of lower court judges being able to issue injunctions against the United States seems to have reached its ultimate absurdity. Regardless of the merits of a particular case, these judges should not have the power to implement national policy, even for brief periods.

I think that injunctions of this kind should have to be approved by a higher court before they can be implemented. What say you?

 

[jbrownson0831]

The idea of lower court judges being able to issue injunctions against the United States seems to have reached its ultimate absurdity. Regardless of the merits of a particular case, these judges should not have the power to implement national policy, even for brief periods.

I think that injunctions of this kind should have to be approved by a higher court before they can be implemented. What say you?

Yep

 

[martybegan]

The idea of lower court judges being able to issue injunctions against the United States seems to have reached its ultimate absurdity. Regardless of the merits of a particular case, these judges should not have the power to implement national policy, even for brief periods.

I think that injunctions of this kind should have to be approved by a higher court before they can be implemented. What say you?

Long past time.

Roberts sent a warning shot the last time, and it seems the dem district judges aren't listening.

 

[Blaster]

The two Rinos on SCOTUS will try to sabotage Trump. Roberts and Barrett should both resign.

 

[MarathonMike]

The idea of lower court judges being able to issue injunctions against the United States seems to have reached its ultimate absurdity. Regardless of the merits of a particular case, these judges should not have the power to implement national policy, even for brief periods.

I think that injunctions of this kind should have to be approved by a higher court before they can be implemented. What say you?

The CCP and the Democrats are the two greatest threats to America. Judges need to go back to doing their job of presiding over cases, not being Democrat operatives working against The President.

 

[Blaster]

Roberts and Barrett need to do the right thing and uphold the constitution.

 

[jackflash]

The idea of lower court judges being able to issue injunctions against the United States seems to have reached its ultimate absurdity. Regardless of the merits of a particular case, these judges should not have the power to implement national policy, even for brief periods.

I think that injunctions of this kind should have to be approved by a higher court before they can be implemented. What say you?

Politically induced judges have ALWAYS presented problems due to their inability to remain impartial when it comes to group/peer pressure & identity politics.

 

[WorldWatcher]

The idea of lower court judges being able to issue injunctions against the United States seems to have reached its ultimate absurdity. Regardless of the merits of a particular case, these judges should not have the power to implement national policy, even for brief periods.

I think that injunctions of this kind should have to be approved by a higher court before they can be implemented. What say you?

Somehow I doubted you complained when District Judge Mark Pittman (Texas, Appointed by Trump) struck down President Biden's actions pertaining to Student Loans.

W

 

[westwall]

The idea of lower court judges being able to issue injunctions against the United States seems to have reached its ultimate absurdity. Regardless of the merits of a particular case, these judges should not have the power to implement national policy, even for brief periods.

I think that injunctions of this kind should have to be approved by a higher court before they can be implemented. What say you?

Long ago.

 

[westwall]

Somehow I doubted you complained when District Judge Mark Pittman (Texas, Appointed by Trump) struck down President Biden's actions pertaining to Student Loans.

W

That's not true. Biden was usurping the power of Congress.

THAT'S why Biden got bitchslapped.

Trump is operating within the COTUS, Biden wasn't.

 

[WorldWatcher]

That's not true. Biden was usurping the power of Congress.

THAT'S why Biden got bitchslapped.

Trump is operating within the COTUS, Biden wasn't.

You think that Trump isn't usurping the power of Congress.

Isn't that special.

WW

 

[westwall]

You think that Trump isn't usurping the power of Congress.

Isn't that special.

WW

No, he isn't. He is operating within the confines of his power set forth in the COTUS.

You should read it so you aren't confused.

 

[WorldWatcher]

No, he isn't. He is operating within the confines of his power set forth in the COTUS.

You should read it so you aren't confused.

You really think that he's been faithfully executing the laws as passed by Congress as required by the Constitution.

Isn't that special.

WW

 

[Rawley]

The idea of lower court judges being able to issue injunctions against the United States seems to have reached its ultimate absurdity. Regardless of the merits of a particular case, these judges should not have the power to implement national policy, even for brief periods.

I think that injunctions of this kind should have to be approved by a higher court before they can be implemented. What say you?

Agree. They can issue injunctions wrt their jurisdictions, but not nationwide.

 

[westwall]

You really think that he's been faithfully executing the laws as passed by Congress as required by the Constitution.

Isn't that special.

WW

No, it's FACTUAL. Funny how you resort to insults instead of addressing the FACTS.

 

[WorldWatcher]

No, it's FACTUAL. Funny how you resort to insults instead of addressing the FACTS.

And when you insult (i.e. Post #12) that's ok?

Hypocrite.

WW

 

[jwoodie]

Somehow I doubted you complained when District Judge Mark Pittman (Texas, Appointed by Trump) struck down President Biden's actions pertaining to Student Loans.

W

The 8th District Court of Appeals had previously ruled against Biden's program.

 

[Maxdeath]

Sorry no I do not agree with the idea of only allowing SCOTUS to rule. We need to keep things as they are. The democrats should learn that not everything they dream up is legal but they will not actually learn that

 

[WorldWatcher]

The 8th District Court of Appeals had previously ruled against Biden's program.

Check your dates. Judge Pittman issued his ruling on November 10th, prior to the 8th Circuit issuing an injunction on November 14th.

Fact remains, Judges ruling against DEMs "good" as Presidents are unitary. Judges ruling against unitary President Trump "bad".

WW

 

[task0778]

The idea of lower court judges being able to issue injunctions against the United States seems to have reached its ultimate absurdity. Regardless of the merits of a particular case, these judges should not have the power to implement national policy, even for brief periods.

I think that injunctions of this kind should have to be approved by a higher court before they can be implemented. What say you?

I think a lower court injunction should expire after 7 days if not extended by a higher court. I also think that Congress should have the authority to suspend any federal judge short of the SCOTUS for subsequent review and corrective action if necessary. Perhaps a reprimand of some sort, short of an outright dismissal.