Threatened with Recall, Evie Hudak (D) to Resign...

[mal]

State Sen. Evie Hudak, faced with recall, to resign - The Denver Post

Don't let the door hitcha where the good lawd splitcha.



peace...

 

[g5000]

She did not have sex in an airport bathroom stall. She did not post naked pictures of herself on Twitter. She did not frequent hookers and wear diapers. She did not cheat on her spouse with a lover from Argentina. She did not get caught trying to buy cocaine.

Hudak was one of four Democratic lawmakers initially targeted because of votes on gun legislation

It was the first recall of a state legislator in Colorado history, and recall opponents argued it set a dangerous precedent.

 

[chikenwing]

She did not have sex in an airport bathroom stall. She did not post naked pictures of herself on Twitter. She did not frequent hookers and wear diapers. She did not cheat on her spouse with a lover from Argentina. She did not get caught trying to buy cocaine.

Hudak was one of four Democratic lawmakers initially targeted because of votes on gun legislation

t was the first recall of a state legislator in Colorado history, and recall opponents argued it set a dangerous precedent.

And your point?

 

[Little-Acorn]

She voted for laws that disarm law-abiding citizens while leaving lawbreakers armed.

Now justice is being done.

 

[martybegan]

She did not have sex in an airport bathroom stall. She did not post naked pictures of herself on Twitter. She did not frequent hookers and wear diapers. She did not cheat on her spouse with a lover from Argentina. She did not get caught trying to buy cocaine.

Hudak was one of four Democratic lawmakers initially targeted because of votes on gun legislation

It was the first recall of a state legislator in Colorado history, and recall opponents argued it set a dangerous precedent.

And what did those Wisconsin Senators, or Gov Walker do beyond supporting a policy not liked by the opposition?

 

[Vox]

she was forced by the dimocraps as they knew she will be recalled and this way they can appoint her successor from their ranks.

 

[g5000]

She voted for laws that disarm law-abiding citizens while leaving lawbreakers armed.

Now justice is being done.

Then vote her out in the normal election process. That's what it is for! You really want a process where whiners can boot someone at the drop of a hat?

Think carefully how you would react if it was one of your own.

 

[Vox]

She did not have sex in an airport bathroom stall. She did not post naked pictures of herself on Twitter. She did not frequent hookers and wear diapers. She did not cheat on her spouse with a lover from Argentina. She did not get caught trying to buy cocaine.

no, she is MUCH worse.

She attempted to take away people's FREEDOM.

 

[g5000]

She did not have sex in an airport bathroom stall. She did not post naked pictures of herself on Twitter. She did not frequent hookers and wear diapers. She did not cheat on her spouse with a lover from Argentina. She did not get caught trying to buy cocaine.

no, she is MUCH worse.

She attempted to take away people's FREEDOM.

I agree she was trying to take away freedom. So vote her out in the normal election. That is what it is for.

 

[Avatar4321]

She did not have sex in an airport bathroom stall. She did not post naked pictures of herself on Twitter. She did not frequent hookers and wear diapers. She did not cheat on her spouse with a lover from Argentina. She did not get caught trying to buy cocaine.

Hudak was one of four Democratic lawmakers initially targeted because of votes on gun legislation

It was the first recall of a state legislator in Colorado history, and recall opponents argued it set a dangerous precedent.

And good for her for not doing that. It's clear she is resigning because she knows she is going to lose the recall and the Dems need to keep the seat.

It's a shrewd political move. My guess is she was promised something down the line.

 

[Vox]

She did not have sex in an airport bathroom stall. She did not post naked pictures of herself on Twitter. She did not frequent hookers and wear diapers. She did not cheat on her spouse with a lover from Argentina. She did not get caught trying to buy cocaine.

no, she is MUCH worse.

She attempted to take away people's FREEDOM.

I agree she was trying to take away freedom. So vote her out in the normal election. That is what it is for.

they did. just by voting out the others.

 

[g5000]

Impulsive behaviors have a way of snapping back in the faces of those who initiate such stupid things.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Threatened with Recall, Evie Hudak (D) to Resign...

The new election will result in a democrat in office.

 

[Vox]

Impulsive behaviors have a way of snapping back in the faces of those who initiate such stupid things.

it is not impulsive behavior.

it is a democratic process.

don't like it - change the rules.

For now a recall election is part of the democratic structure of this country.

 

[martybegan]

She voted for laws that disarm law-abiding citizens while leaving lawbreakers armed.

Now justice is being done.

Then vote her out in the normal election process. That's what it is for! You really want a process where whiners can boot someone at the drop of a hat?

Think carefully how you would react if it was one of your own.

Oh, Hai there!!!

 

[Missouri_Mike]

She did not have sex in an airport bathroom stall. She did not post naked pictures of herself on Twitter. She did not frequent hookers and wear diapers. She did not cheat on her spouse with a lover from Argentina. She did not get caught trying to buy cocaine.

no, she is MUCH worse.

She attempted to take away people's FREEDOM.

I agree she was trying to take away freedom. So vote her out in the normal election. That is what it is for.

Someone that passes such a crappy law that it pisses their voters off to the point they don't want to tolerate them any longer doesn't deserve to finish their term. That's what recalls are for.

 

[Avatar4321]

She voted for laws that disarm law-abiding citizens while leaving lawbreakers armed.

Now justice is being done.

Then vote her out in the normal election process. That's what it is for! You really want a process where whiners can boot someone at the drop of a hat?

Think carefully how you would react if it was one of your own.

If the constituents are that unhappy with her representation and recall is a legitimate means of removing someone from power, then what's the problem? Recall isn't exactly an easy thing to accomplish.

 

[Antares]

She voted for laws that disarm law-abiding citizens while leaving lawbreakers armed.

Now justice is being done.

Then vote her out in the normal election process. That's what it is for! You really want a process where whiners can boot someone at the drop of a hat?

Think carefully how you would react if it was one of your own.

The prescribed process is being followed, if this is what Colorado wants then they can do it.

 

[g5000]

no, she is MUCH worse.

She attempted to take away people's FREEDOM.

I agree she was trying to take away freedom. So vote her out in the normal election. That is what it is for.

Someone that passes such a crappy law that it pisses their voters off to the point they don't want to tolerate them any longer doesn't deserve to finish their term. That's what recalls are for.

The recall was being funded in large part by people who aren't even her constituents, so that is a bogus argument.

And she was not in violation of any laws.

Just remember where you set this bar. It can and will be used against you one day.

It strikes me as supreme hypocrisy to tolerate scumbags who actually violate our laws and cheat on their wives and act like depraved animals, and yet these organizations are not funding recall drives for them.

The way we treat the opposition reveals how much we actually believe in the Golden Rule.

 

[Antares]

I agree she was trying to take away freedom. So vote her out in the normal election. That is what it is for.

Someone that passes such a crappy law that it pisses their voters off to the point they don't want to tolerate them any longer doesn't deserve to finish their term. That's what recalls are for.

The recall was being funded in large part by people who aren't even her constituents, so that is a bogus argument.

And she was not in violation of any laws.

Just remember where you set this bar. It can and will be used against you one day.

It strikes me as supreme hypocrisy to tolerate scumbags who actually violate our laws and cheat on their wives and act like depraved animals, and yet these organizations are not funding recall drives for them.

The way we treat the opposition reveals how much we actually believe in the Golden Rule.

The bar was set in Wisconsin, sorry.