1srelluc
Diamond Member

Colorado resort communities want to impose a vacancy tax on unoccupied homes
The legislative plan for the Colorado Association of Ski Towns includes a first-ever vacancy tax and a real estate transfer fee.

The legislative agenda for the Colorado Association of Ski Towns includes a first-ever vacancy tax as well as a real estate transfer fee on all property sales to help fund affordable housing.
A consortium of mountain towns will push Colorado lawmakers this year to pass legislation that would enable local governments to ask voters to tax homes that sit empty for most of the year.
There are no communities in Colorado that tax empty homes, but the growing challenge of building affordable housing for workers in mountain communities where real estate prices are soaring and as many as 40% of homes are unoccupied by full-time residents is fueling creative thinking around new revenue sources.
"We are not asking the legislature to make it so. This just clears some potential land mines for communities who might want to do this," said Jonathan Godes, a councilman in Glenwood Springs and president of the Colorado Association of Ski Towns, or CAST, which is promoting the legislation for the coming session.
CAST is asking its 28 resort town members to support a bold legislative agenda this year. The group also is hoping for lawmakers to approve legislation that will enable local governments to approve fees on every real estate transaction.
(There are 12 Western Slopes communities that have real estate transfer taxes from 1% to 3% on all property transactions that were established before passage of the 1992 Taxpayer's Bill of Rights, or TABOR, which prevents new taxes without voters approval. Those communities Aspen, Avon, Breckenridge, Crested Butte, Frisco, Gypsum, Snowmass Village, Telluride, Vail and Winter Park are collecting record revenues in recent years as home prices soar.)
CAST also plans to lobby for legislation that would smooth the process for asking voters to allow taxes on short-term rentals. In recent years, voters in at least 10 mountain towns have overwhelmingly approved taxes on vacation rentals.
CO must all be Motorhead fans.
I always wonder about tourism economy towns that seem to hate tourism.
So if you have a home there I'm betting you already have the exact same tax burden regardless of how much time you spend in the residence.
I’ll also bet that if you are a part time resident you utilize far less government services (schools for example) than those there full time. If anything, the part timers are already paying more than their fair share already.