There was not "common Eve". 100% proved

[newrebel]

Humanity did not have common ancestors. At least there was no common mother.
"Eve" is the progenitor of the Neanderthal population, from her most Europeans descend.
American and Indo-Aryan progenitor is a woman of the Ubaid civilization.

If there was a common Eve, we would observe a gradual divergence of the anthropological type. in fact, everything is the opposite, the sharpest difference was at the very beginning.

 

[jwoodie]

Humanity did not have common ancestors. At least there was no common mother.

I think the assertion is that modern humans have a common ancestor, not other extinct human species.

 

[luiza]

At the simplest level your OP assertion seems nonsensical .
By definition any existing population stems from a beginning .
Mathematically .
All sequences have a start point .

Less popular ideas are that development was interfered with at some specific point in time from the outside .
And , this type of intervention occurred more than once and also occurred at different locations across the globe .

 

[newrebel]

At the simplest level your OP assertion seems nonsensical .
By definition any existing population stems from a beginning .
Mathematically .
All sequences have a start point .

Less popular ideas are that development was interfered with at some specific point in time from the outside .
And , this type of intervention occurred more than once and also occurred at different locations across the globe .

No matter what the interventions were, from outside or from inside, don't distract people from the topic.
The point is that modern humanity consists of two main species, which are partially mixed.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

All humans have both a Most recent common female and most recent common male ancestor.


It's not up for debate. It's a mathematical proof.

 

[newrebel]

I think the assertion is that modern humans have a common ancestor, not other extinct human species.

This common ancestor between Ubaid man and Neanderthal could have been a mouse or an ant. it might not have existed at all. It doesn't matter.

 

[newrebel]

I think the assertion is that modern humans have a common ancestor, not other extinct human species.

This cannot be proven even on the basis of a common gene pool, because there is horizontal transfer

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

This cannot be proven even on the basis of a common gene pool, because there is horizontal transfer

This cannot be proven even on the basis of a common gene pool, because there is horizontal transfer

False. It's a fairly simple mathematical proof.

 

[newrebel]

False. It's a fairly simple mathematical proof.

Nothing is proven. If, for example, we believe that man descended from a proto-ape, then the physiology of a pig could have appeared either from crossing with a pig, or from horizontal transfer. They do not know this.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Nothing is proven.

Wrong. It's a simple mathematical proof.

This is actually one of the few things in biilogy that CAN be proven, 100%, beyond any doubt.

 

[newrebel]

Wrong. It's a simple mathematical proof.

This is actually one of the few things in biilogy that CAN be proven, 100%, beyond any doubt.

It seems you don't understand anything about this, you haven't understood the essence of the problem.