The fight against technology and the fight for technology

[SkyscrapersUS]

Many people fight for technology to disappear, and many people fight for technology to continue to develop.

Neither one nor the other should be PUBLICLY ADVERTISED, because it creates negative difficulties for people in life (fear, psychosis).

Technology is a thing that changes by itself with population changes, not as most people think with time. That is, most people think that technology will be more developed in 2100 compared to 2024. And the truth is that technology will be more developed if the population continues to increase.

Some people live better and more beautifully without electricity, they are heated by fireplaces using wood, they enjoy more in nature, etc.. And for others, it is better when the technology is more developed, it suits them better. Therefore it is not good publicly advertise and fight for the development of technology, and it is not good to advertise and fight against technology.

The fight for and against technology should be a private matter for each individual.

 

[ReinyDays]

Many people fight for technology to disappear, and many people fight for technology to continue to develop.

Neither one nor the other should be PUBLICLY ADVERTISED, because it creates negative difficulties for people in life (fear, psychosis).

Technology is a thing that changes by itself with population changes, not as most people think with time. That is, most people think that technology will be more developed in 2100 compared to 2024. And the truth is that technology will be more developed if the population continues to increase.

Some people live better and more beautifully without electricity, they are heated by fireplaces using wood, they enjoy more in nature, etc.. And for others, it is better when the technology is more developed, it suits them better. Therefore it is not good publicly advertise and fight for the development of technology, and it is not good to advertise and fight against technology.

The fight for and against technology should be a private matter for each individual.

You've never heated with wood have you? ... boy, what diaper-load ... how can you hear nature over the sound of the chainsaw ... how do you enjoy nature clear-cutting the forests? ... oh wait, no technology, you're using a bow-saw? ...

How are you connected to the internet without electricity .. hypocrite ... we'd certainly be happier if you didn't have electricity ... burning coal to condemn burning coal ... you sound like a liberal/commie/hippy McGovernic ...

 

[sealybobo]

Many people fight for technology to disappear, and many people fight for technology to continue to develop.

Neither one nor the other should be PUBLICLY ADVERTISED, because it creates negative difficulties for people in life (fear, psychosis).

Technology is a thing that changes by itself with population changes, not as most people think with time. That is, most people think that technology will be more developed in 2100 compared to 2024. And the truth is that technology will be more developed if the population continues to increase.

Some people live better and more beautifully without electricity, they are heated by fireplaces using wood, they enjoy more in nature, etc.. And for others, it is better when the technology is more developed, it suits them better. Therefore it is not good publicly advertise and fight for the development of technology, and it is not good to advertise and fight against technology.

The fight for and against technology should be a private matter for each individual.

That isn't true that we have to keep increasing our population in order to get smarter. Each generation starting way back when the first guy started a fire. The tribe passed that knowledge on. Yes, with more people more inventions came but now that we have 8 billion people on the planet, I think the earth will be better off if we keep the population where it was in 1960, at 3 billion. Can you believe we are at 8 billion now? Too much.

So imagine the 3 billion people having children and teaching them math, science, automation, computers, engineering. Each generation passes on the knowledge and the next generation builds on it. Even if 3 billion people only produce 3 billion new people in 200 years, those new people will be smarter than their ancestors because humans are good at saving the knowledge we've learned.

There have been times in history where knowledge was wiped out. The Great Alexander Library is gone. All the knowledge gone. Islam wiped away thousands of years of Arabic knowledge. Algebra, Algorithms, all arabic things. Since Islam, nuthin.

I think we are so unevolved. We should be way further ahead than where we are now. But I think we are close to a breakthrough. With AI and automation, in the very near future people won't have to do manual labor. A human won't have to paint a room. Cook dinner. We will have AI robots.

I was thinking if this happens in 200 or 400 years, those people will look back at what we are doing now and laugh at us for not figuring it out sooner. Life is too short to work a shitty job 45 hours a week for 45 years