Unkotare
Diamond Member
- Aug 16, 2011
- 136,474
- 28,289
- 2,180
How much emphasis should be placed on actually learning a foreign language (or languages) well for secondary school students in English-speaking countries?
When I was in school you had to take either Spanish or French starting in Jr High, but it was never treated as an 'important' subject, and nothing approaching true, practical facility with the language was really expected. Should it be? Should kids be started much sooner and with much higher expectations of eventual fluency? Should a wider variety of choice be available to all students in regards to foreign-language study? Should foreign languages be required at all if a student's first language happens to be the global lingua franca of the day?
Reviving languages: Generation monoglot | The Economist
In the UK: "The past two decades have witnessed a sharp decline in the numbers of teenagers poring over French verbs, let alone the oddities of German, which as Mark Twain, a 19th-century American writer, observed, renders a girl neuter but a turnip feminine."
"That accelerated a longer period of modern-languages decline, as pupils switched to subjects perceived to be easier or more practical."
"Reasons for the reluctance to persist with languages might include emphasis by successive governments on maths, science and technology. But overall, incentives to learn languages in Britain remain frustratingly haphazard. Primary schools are not required to teach a foreign language. Steve Smith, a teacher and blogger on language trends, notes that the university admissions system no longer treats a language as a core requirement."
" A reason for Britain’s poor record of producing linguists may also lie in the thought that they are not essential, because English dominates. Daniel Hannan, an outspoken (and multilingual) member of the European Parliament, says the case for learning French and German is dwindling as travel and trade widen out beyond Europe. Pupils may well do better to know Turkish and Arabic instead, he says—assuming that they don’t mind the humiliation of struggling with a French menu."
When I was in school you had to take either Spanish or French starting in Jr High, but it was never treated as an 'important' subject, and nothing approaching true, practical facility with the language was really expected. Should it be? Should kids be started much sooner and with much higher expectations of eventual fluency? Should a wider variety of choice be available to all students in regards to foreign-language study? Should foreign languages be required at all if a student's first language happens to be the global lingua franca of the day?
Reviving languages: Generation monoglot | The Economist
In the UK: "The past two decades have witnessed a sharp decline in the numbers of teenagers poring over French verbs, let alone the oddities of German, which as Mark Twain, a 19th-century American writer, observed, renders a girl neuter but a turnip feminine."
"That accelerated a longer period of modern-languages decline, as pupils switched to subjects perceived to be easier or more practical."
"Reasons for the reluctance to persist with languages might include emphasis by successive governments on maths, science and technology. But overall, incentives to learn languages in Britain remain frustratingly haphazard. Primary schools are not required to teach a foreign language. Steve Smith, a teacher and blogger on language trends, notes that the university admissions system no longer treats a language as a core requirement."
" A reason for Britain’s poor record of producing linguists may also lie in the thought that they are not essential, because English dominates. Daniel Hannan, an outspoken (and multilingual) member of the European Parliament, says the case for learning French and German is dwindling as travel and trade widen out beyond Europe. Pupils may well do better to know Turkish and Arabic instead, he says—assuming that they don’t mind the humiliation of struggling with a French menu."