something funny just happened to me & FOX, MSNBC, & CNN

[basquebromance]

i had it on FOX. Tucker guest said: "there's no evidence of colusion" i flipped it to MSNBC right there, they said: "there is so much evidence of collusion"...i instantly flipped it to CNN, Congressman Jim Himes said: "we don't know if there's evidence of collusion"

if you hear all sides, you dont know what the truth is!

 

[JGalt]

FOX is going with the "innocent until proven guilty" angle, which is correct. It's up to the others to prove his guilt, and they can't. Neither can Muller.

 

[DGS49]

Depends on how you look at it. Those with a taste for reality understand that (a) Nobody in the country ever believed that Trump had a snowball's chance of winning, right up until about 9pm Eastern on Election night. So the people around Trump were not particularly diligent about turning square corners, so to speak. (b). ANY candidate in ANY election will pounce at the chance to get negative information about an opponent, regardless of its source. Russia, China, Cuba, doesn't matter.

So to some people, the fact that Donald Jr. agreed to meet with some Russian woman in order to get dirt on Hillary is No Big Deal. To others, it is "evidence of collusion."

Same facts, different interpretation.

The "funny" part is, the Mueller character has been trying for almost two years to take that one simple fact and weave it into an indictable offense by President Trump, and he has come up with bupkis. Millions and millions and millions of dollars wasted.

 

[Slade3200]

FOX is going with the "innocent until proven guilty" angle, which is correct. It's up to the others to prove his guilt, and they can't. Neither can Muller.

I think Fox is going to go with innocent even if proven guilty, but we will see. Clinton was sure as hell guilty from the get go so I wouldn’t play it like Fox is unbiased. Each network has obvious leanings.

 

[JGalt]

Depends on how you look at it. Those with a taste for reality understand that (a) Nobody in the country ever believed that Trump had a snowball's chance of winning, right up until about 9pm Eastern on Election night. So the people around Trump were not particularly diligent about turning square corners, so to speak. (b). ANY candidate in ANY election will pounce at the chance to get negative information about an opponent, regardless of its source. Russia, China, Cuba, doesn't matter.

So to some people, the fact that Donald Jr. agreed to meet with some Russian woman in order to get dirt on Hillary is No Big Deal. To others, it is "evidence of collusion."

Same facts, different interpretation.

The "funny" part is, the Mueller character has been trying for almost two years to take that one simple fact and weave it into an indictable offense by President Trump, and he has come up with bupkis. Millions and millions and millions of dollars wasted.

Trump "met with Russian women"? Did I miss something?

There was that one Russian woman who tried to broker a secret meeting between Trump and Putin, which I don't see a problem with.

 

[Slade3200]

Depends on how you look at it. Those with a taste for reality understand that (a) Nobody in the country ever believed that Trump had a snowball's chance of winning, right up until about 9pm Eastern on Election night. So the people around Trump were not particularly diligent about turning square corners, so to speak. (b). ANY candidate in ANY election will pounce at the chance to get negative information about an opponent, regardless of its source. Russia, China, Cuba, doesn't matter.

So to some people, the fact that Donald Jr. agreed to meet with some Russian woman in order to get dirt on Hillary is No Big Deal. To others, it is "evidence of collusion."

Same facts, different interpretation.

The "funny" part is, the Mueller character has been trying for almost two years to take that one simple fact and weave it into an indictable offense by President Trump, and he has come up with bupkis. Millions and millions and millions of dollars wasted.

I don’t think the trump tower meet was the catalyst to Muellers investigation, it was Flynn lying right after the election, followed by the firing up Comey because he wouldn’t let Flynn off the hook. That’s what started it. Then theres whatever classified details that were discovered behind Flynn’s lies which none of us know. The several others who have lied and the trump tower meet are all extra pods of dirt that have surfaced in the course of the investigation. We don’t yet know WHY so many were lying and what truth they were trying to hide.

 

[JGalt]

Depends on how you look at it. Those with a taste for reality understand that (a) Nobody in the country ever believed that Trump had a snowball's chance of winning, right up until about 9pm Eastern on Election night. So the people around Trump were not particularly diligent about turning square corners, so to speak. (b). ANY candidate in ANY election will pounce at the chance to get negative information about an opponent, regardless of its source. Russia, China, Cuba, doesn't matter.

So to some people, the fact that Donald Jr. agreed to meet with some Russian woman in order to get dirt on Hillary is No Big Deal. To others, it is "evidence of collusion."

Same facts, different interpretation.

The "funny" part is, the Mueller character has been trying for almost two years to take that one simple fact and weave it into an indictable offense by President Trump, and he has come up with bupkis. Millions and millions and millions of dollars wasted.

I don’t think the trump tower meet was the catalyst to Muellers investigation, it was Flynn lying right after the election, followed by the firing up Comey because he wouldn’t let Flynn off the hook. That’s what started it. Then theres whatever classified details that were discovered behind Flynn’s lies which none of us know. The several others who have lied and the trump tower meet are all extra pods of dirt that have surfaced in the course of the investigation. We don’t yet know WHY so many were lying and what truth they were trying to hide.

Better yet, how many FBI and Justice Department personnel have either been fired or quit? Why were so many of them lying, even to Congress, and what were they hiding?

Strzok, Page, Comey, Yates, McCabe, Kortan, Rybicki, Baker, Campbell, Turgal. Bower, Steinbach, Giacalone, Ohr, Laufman, BRand, Anderson, Carlin, Kadzik, McCo0rd, Axelrod, Bharara, McGowan, Flyn,. Gupta, and Mcelvain, all working for the FBI or DOJ. And all Obama-era appointees who were most likely involved in overturning a legally-elected President.

Mueller Probe Seems to Ignore the Real Instigators -

 

[Slade3200]

Depends on how you look at it. Those with a taste for reality understand that (a) Nobody in the country ever believed that Trump had a snowball's chance of winning, right up until about 9pm Eastern on Election night. So the people around Trump were not particularly diligent about turning square corners, so to speak. (b). ANY candidate in ANY election will pounce at the chance to get negative information about an opponent, regardless of its source. Russia, China, Cuba, doesn't matter.

So to some people, the fact that Donald Jr. agreed to meet with some Russian woman in order to get dirt on Hillary is No Big Deal. To others, it is "evidence of collusion."

Same facts, different interpretation.

The "funny" part is, the Mueller character has been trying for almost two years to take that one simple fact and weave it into an indictable offense by President Trump, and he has come up with bupkis. Millions and millions and millions of dollars wasted.

I don’t think the trump tower meet was the catalyst to Muellers investigation, it was Flynn lying right after the election, followed by the firing up Comey because he wouldn’t let Flynn off the hook. That’s what started it. Then theres whatever classified details that were discovered behind Flynn’s lies which none of us know. The several others who have lied and the trump tower meet are all extra pods of dirt that have surfaced in the course of the investigation. We don’t yet know WHY so many were lying and what truth they were trying to hide.

Better yet, how many FBI and Justice Department personnel have either been fired or quit? Why were so many of them lying, even to Congress, and what were they hiding?

Strzok, Page, Comey, Yates, McCabe, Kortan, Rybicki, Baker, Campbell, Turgal. Bower, Steinbach, Giacalone, Ohr, Laufman, BRand, Anderson, Carlin, Kadzik, McCo0rd, Axelrod, Bharara, McGowan, Flyn,. Gupta, and Mcelvain, all working for the FBI or DOJ. And all Obama-era appointees who were most likely involved in overturning a legally-elected President.

Mueller Probe Seems to Ignore the Real Instigators -

Huh? What’s with that list of names? All those people didn’t quit or were fired for lying... looks like you just put a big list of names out there to make it look like there are a ton of Democratic bad actors but that’s not truthful Per this discussion. I’ll have an honest conversation with you about it but you gotta be honest about what we are talking about. So who exactly are you accusing of lying and what is that you think they were covering up?

 

[Care4all]

Depends on how you look at it. Those with a taste for reality understand that (a) Nobody in the country ever believed that Trump had a snowball's chance of winning, right up until about 9pm Eastern on Election night. So the people around Trump were not particularly diligent about turning square corners, so to speak. (b). ANY candidate in ANY election will pounce at the chance to get negative information about an opponent, regardless of its source. Russia, China, Cuba, doesn't matter.

So to some people, the fact that Donald Jr. agreed to meet with some Russian woman in order to get dirt on Hillary is No Big Deal. To others, it is "evidence of collusion."

Same facts, different interpretation.

The "funny" part is, the Mueller character has been trying for almost two years to take that one simple fact and weave it into an indictable offense by President Trump, and he has come up with bupkis. Millions and millions and millions of dollars wasted.

I don’t think the trump tower meet was the catalyst to Muellers investigation, it was Flynn lying right after the election, followed by the firing up Comey because he wouldn’t let Flynn off the hook. That’s what started it. Then theres whatever classified details that were discovered behind Flynn’s lies which none of us know. The several others who have lied and the trump tower meet are all extra pods of dirt that have surfaced in the course of the investigation. We don’t yet know WHY so many were lying and what truth they were trying to hide.

Better yet, how many FBI and Justice Department personnel have either been fired or quit? Why were so many of them lying, even to Congress, and what were they hiding?

Strzok, Page, Comey, Yates, McCabe, Kortan, Rybicki, Baker, Campbell, Turgal. Bower, Steinbach, Giacalone, Ohr, Laufman, BRand, Anderson, Carlin, Kadzik, McCo0rd, Axelrod, Bharara, McGowan, Flyn,. Gupta, and Mcelvain, all working for the FBI or DOJ. And all Obama-era appointees who were most likely involved in overturning a legally-elected President.

Mueller Probe Seems to Ignore the Real Instigators -

Every single person that knew the TRUTH about President Trump's illegal doings, collusion, and partnership with Russia and Putin, with the help of the Republican crooks in congress like Nunes and Jordon and Meadows covering it up, were fired.

Trump framed their demise with his own story and web of lies, and then fired them....

A super sized Saturday Night Massacre, in slow motion.

Today's revelation of all the lies, the phony congressional investigation and narrative in their phony summary put out to the public, and preventing their investigation transcripts and interviews of Trump people lying to Congress from being sent over to Mueller's team, has
just ended....

Today was day 1 of the Russian collusion investigation's revealing.... hold on to your hats...

people on the right have been asking for the Russian collusion facts, well it's finally Mueller Time.