Seymour Flops
Diamond Member
This is the graph:
He showed it while grilling Russell Vought, former Director of OMB now nominated to take the role again.
Whitehouse explained that the blue line represents the income growth of people in the bottom 20% of incomes, while the rust-colored and burnt orange lines represent the top .01% and the top 1% (excluding the top .01%).
Two points that show how people like Whitehouse are out of touch with the economic realities of the American people:
1) He leaves out 79% of the American people, i.e. those in-between the bottom 20% of earners and the top 1%. Not an accident. This is how Democrats see America, a small group of ultra-rich taking advantage of a large group of downtrodden poor. The middle class don't figure into Democrat thinking, so the middle-class voted them out of power.
That rich vs. poor divide is like Venezuala, North Korea, Angola, and South Africa, not like the U.S.
2) He makes no mention of economic mobility or lack thereof nor the causes of either. Many of the people in the bottom 20% in 2000, for example, were either high school or college students working minimum wage part-time jobs. By now, they are firmly in that middle class that Senator Whitehouse ignores.
But, many are basically permanent members of that bottom 20%. What makes the difference? You know what makes the difference, unless you are a Democrat. The difference is one group working their way out of the bottom and the other being comfortable with whatever welfare provides.
The graph doesn't say whether people of color were included in the numbers. Given Whitehouse's past, it may very well be a whites-only chart.
He showed it while grilling Russell Vought, former Director of OMB now nominated to take the role again.
Whitehouse explained that the blue line represents the income growth of people in the bottom 20% of incomes, while the rust-colored and burnt orange lines represent the top .01% and the top 1% (excluding the top .01%).
Two points that show how people like Whitehouse are out of touch with the economic realities of the American people:
1) He leaves out 79% of the American people, i.e. those in-between the bottom 20% of earners and the top 1%. Not an accident. This is how Democrats see America, a small group of ultra-rich taking advantage of a large group of downtrodden poor. The middle class don't figure into Democrat thinking, so the middle-class voted them out of power.
That rich vs. poor divide is like Venezuala, North Korea, Angola, and South Africa, not like the U.S.
2) He makes no mention of economic mobility or lack thereof nor the causes of either. Many of the people in the bottom 20% in 2000, for example, were either high school or college students working minimum wage part-time jobs. By now, they are firmly in that middle class that Senator Whitehouse ignores.
But, many are basically permanent members of that bottom 20%. What makes the difference? You know what makes the difference, unless you are a Democrat. The difference is one group working their way out of the bottom and the other being comfortable with whatever welfare provides.
The graph doesn't say whether people of color were included in the numbers. Given Whitehouse's past, it may very well be a whites-only chart.