Originals Poster Who Never Services Their Threads

[1srelluc]

There really needs to be a new rule stating that the OP must service their threads X number of times that they start.....I mean at least once for goodness sake.

C_Clayton_Jones is a perfect example of this.....He/she just "leaves this here" and seldom, if ever, returns.

It makes me think that he/she is just spewing talking points distributed by some entity.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

There really needs to be a new rule stating that the OP must service their threads X number of times that they start.....I mean at least once for goodness sake.

C_Clayton_Jones is a perfect example of this.....He/she just "leaves this here" and seldom, if ever, returns.

It makes me think that he/she is just spewing talking points distributed by some entity.

.

Or a paid shill who gets paid by the thread, rather than the post.

.

 

[1srelluc]

.

Or a paid shill who gets paid by the thread, rather than the post.

.

Well, I did not want to say that in the OP, but yeah, seems that way sure enough.

 

[MarathonMike]

When I saw the thread title, that's immediately who came to mind.

 

[Mack The Finger]

.

Or a paid shill who gets paid by the thread, rather than the post.

.

They do all seem to have the same theme.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

There really needs to be a new rule stating that the OP must service their threads X number of times that they start.....I mean at least once for goodness sake.

C_Clayton_Jones is a perfect example of this.....He/she just "leaves this here" and seldom, if ever, returns.

It makes me think that he/she is just spewing talking points distributed by some entity.

Clayton is a D.N.C. bot. It isn't a real person. There are several others like Berg who simply post the obligatory tracts of D.N.C. propaganda every day, though.

 

[Chuz Life]

I especially get pissed about this practice when I try to actually engage with my own threads and get a "USMB has exceeded its bandwidth" instead.

I've considered 'donating' to help get more bandwith but then I consider all the shit (like thread spams) that tell me to not waste my limited money on it.

 

[Harry Dresden]

Clayton is a D.N.C. bot. It isn't a real person. There are several others like Berg who simply post the obligatory tracts of D.N.C. propaganda every day, though.

jones aint a bot years ago he made the mistake of actually replying to a post i made and i called him on it....then he went back to being jones....

 

[Lumpy 1]

Clayton is a D.N.C. bot. It isn't a real person. There are several others like Berg who simply post the obligatory tracts of D.N.C. propaganda every day, though.

It's tough telling the difference between a boto-crat and a Democrat, they pretty well all sound the same and lack a sense of humor.

 

[Oddball]

There really needs to be a new rule stating that the OP must service their threads X number of times that they start.....I mean at least once for goodness sake.

C_Clayton_Jones is a perfect example of this.....He/she just "leaves this here" and seldom, if ever, returns.

It makes me think that he/she is just spewing talking points distributed by some entity.

Skewsey is a frequent practitioner of the drive-by.

 

[MisterBeale]

There really needs to be a new rule stating that the OP must service their threads X number of times that they start.....I mean at least once for goodness sake.

C_Clayton_Jones is a perfect example of this.....He/she just "leaves this here" and seldom, if ever, returns.

It makes me think that he/she is just spewing talking points distributed by some entity.

They won't do this.

They want folks to make content, so anything that would unnecessarily throttle and discourage creating content will never be implemented.

 

[1srelluc]

They won't do this.

They want folks to make content, so anything that would unnecessarily throttle and discourage creating content will never be implemented.

Yeah I know.

Sigh, hope springs eternal.

 

[Winco]

.

Or a paid shill who gets paid by the thread, rather than the post.

.

That's a thing?
People posting here really can get paid?

Who's paying them?
How Much?
How does one sign up?

 

[WelfareQueen]

There really needs to be a new rule stating that the OP must service their threads X number of times that they start.....I mean at least once for goodness sake.

C_Clayton_Jones is a perfect example of this.....He/she just "leaves this here" and seldom, if ever, returns.

It makes me think that he/she is just spewing talking points distributed by some entity.

They/them is a vagina. (And yes, that word still works).

 

[Captain Caveman]

There really needs to be a new rule stating that the OP must service their threads X number of times that they start.....I mean at least once for goodness sake.

C_Clayton_Jones is a perfect example of this.....He/she just "leaves this here" and seldom, if ever, returns.

It makes me think that he/she is just spewing talking points distributed by some entity.

The problem is, the likes of Clayton follow a rigid narrative which makes genuine debate impossible because it prioritizes maintaining a specific, pre-determined belief system over the objective analysis of facts.

Folk just need to follow what they believe instead of following a party narrative. Quite a few here can't. Clinton, Obama, Biden, Trump didn't do everything right, but if that person's narrative tries to say everything they did was right, or everything was wrong, it fecks their arguement. It stands out like a puppy sitting a big pile of poo.

The biggest culprits, Lefties and hardened MAGA's.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

They won't do this.

They want folks to make content, so anything that would unnecessarily throttle and discourage creating content will never be implemented.

This place is a trollocracy.

Ranting confrontational posts designed to enflame receive more attention than carefully crafted posts that are rational and balanced.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

There really needs to be a new rule stating that the OP must service their threads X number of times that they start.....I mean at least once for goodness sake.

C_Clayton_Jones is a perfect example of this.....He/she just "leaves this here" and seldom, if ever, returns.

It makes me think that he/she is just spewing talking points distributed by some entity.

Who said you had to participate?

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Who said you had to participate?

You should encourage original content and discourage large walls of text via cut and paste.

You not only do not do that but come down on anybody who wants discussion rather than propaganda.

 

[Mashmont]

That's a thing?
People posting here really can get paid?

Who's paying them?
How Much?
How does one sign up?

You have to have a connection on the payroll to vouch for you. The best bet is to go to a leftwing rally/riot and talk to the lesbian shouting into the megaphone. Or go to Crowds on Demand. I hear they hire shills to write fake posts across various sites.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

That's a thing?
People posting here really can get paid?

Who's paying them?
How Much?
How does one sign up?

.

You think I know this.






.