Obama to sign order forcing government to hire convicts

ShootSpeeders

Gold Member
Joined
May 13, 2012
Messages
20,232
Reaction score
2,403
Points
280
He's also giving early release to 6,600 drug criminals right now. And that's just the start. It's gonna be like 40,000 over the next year! And then there's the 40 million illegal invaders he refuses to even try to deport. The most lawless man in america.

Obama to Sign Order Forcing Government to Hire Convicts - Breitbart

nov 2 2015 Ever in search of benefits to hand leftist constituencies, Democrats have decided to give goodies to their most natural constituency of all: criminals. According to the Associated Press, President Obama will announce executive orders Monday attempting to prevent screening for prior criminality in government hiring.

The so-called “ban the box” program would prevent government agencies from asking about criminal history until later in the interview process. Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (D-NY), Vermont Senator Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT)16%
(D-Loonbag), and former Maryland Governor Martin O’Malley have all joined Obama in calling for banning “the box” – meaning the check box for criminal conviction. Obama also wants to prevent public housing from hindering the ability for convicted criminals to gain access to subsidies.

So, in short, we all get to hire unhireable employees with criminal backgrounds, and subsidize those who wouldn’t be able to find housing because they have committed crimes
 
Wow. So now convicts can be hired as federal employees. Unbelievable.

The destruction this human filth has brought upon our country....


Liberals....150 years from now some historians will look back at 2008 and 2012...and say that the morons who voted for this guy were the dumbest, most brain dead humans since..well...maybe the Roman heathens and perverts....and that the downfall of the USA and Western society began at that point...and you dumbasses enabled it.

Good job libs. You wanted America to be destroyed. You elected a guy who got the ball rolling.
 
"Obama to sign order forcing government to hire convicts"

The ^^^ title is wrong. ^^^ Untrue. LIE. ^^^


"So now convicts can be hired as federal employees."


The federal government has always been able to hire EX-convicts.

Get a grip fools. Just get a grip.

:rolleyes:
 
"Obama to sign order forcing government to hire convicts"

The ^^^ title is wrong. ^^^ Untrue. LIE. ^^^


"So now convicts can be hired as federal employees."


The federal government has always been able to hire EX-convicts.

Get a grip fools. Just get a grip.

:rolleyes:

Then what is the order???
 
Also from the article

The real rationale for the new push for “criminal justice reform” by the left is simple: more Democrat voters. In July, Obama stated, “If folks have served their time, and they’ve re-entered society, they should be able to vote.” And according to the Department of Justice, more than 650,000 people are released from prison each year. That number will rise as Obama lets people out of prison early. All of these people are of the age of majority, and virtually all would vote Democrat. So, presumably, would their families members. That’s a hefty chunk of votes.

That says it all. Early release of criminals is just like amnesty for illegals. A way to get more democrat votes.
 
Isn't affirmative action enough special treatment for blacks.? Democrats say no.
 

Why are people so concerned about keeping "drug criminals" locked up? I say let them go.

 
Why are people so concerned about keeping "drug criminals" locked up? I say let them go.


And unemployed. People who have done their time shouldn't have to have it follow them and handicap their ability to earn a living forever.
 
Last edited:
Why are people so concerned about keeping "drug criminals" locked up? I say let them go.


And unemployed. People who have done their time shouldn't have to have it follow and handicap their ability to earn a living forever.

nice theory..unrealistic, but "nice"....a clean record is crucial in some jobs..mandatory in some...and highly desirable in others...
people who can't manage to follow the laws deserve to have their record closely examined.
The best indicator for future behavior is ....past behavior.
 
Why are people so concerned about keeping "drug criminals" locked up? I say let them go.


And unemployed. People who have done their time shouldn't have to have it follow and handicap their ability to earn a living forever.

Actually by giving them no way to earn a living what do they think is going to happen.

So suppose you go to jail for 4 years for selling 4oz marijuana (non violent). And while in Jail you got a degree in accountancy and some of your exams...

You paid your debt to society and looks like you knuckled down and made use of your time... Why can't you apply for a government job?

Will you not get asked got taxes too? When does that person become a citizen with full rights again?
 
"Obama to sign order forcing government to hire convicts"

The ^^^ title is wrong. ^^^ Untrue. LIE. ^^^


"So now convicts can be hired as federal employees."


The federal government has always been able to hire EX-convicts.

Get a grip fools. Just get a grip.

:rolleyes:

Then what is the order???

The order is to remove a check box.
 
Why are people so concerned about keeping "drug criminals" locked up? I say let them go.


And unemployed. People who have done their time shouldn't have to have it follow and handicap their ability to earn a living forever.

nice theory..unrealistic, but "nice"....a clean record is crucial in some jobs..mandatory in some...and highly desirable in others...
people who can't manage to follow the laws deserve to have their record closely examined.
The best indicator for future behavior is ....past behavior.

Not really.
 
Why are people so concerned about keeping "drug criminals" locked up? I say let them go.


And unemployed. People who have done their time shouldn't have to have it follow and handicap their ability to earn a living forever.

nice theory..unrealistic, but "nice"....a clean record is crucial in some jobs..mandatory in some...and highly desirable in others...
people who can't manage to follow the laws deserve to have their record closely examined.
The best indicator for future behavior is ....past behavior.

Not really.

yes...really
 
Why are people so concerned about keeping "drug criminals" locked up? I say let them go.


And unemployed. People who have done their time shouldn't have to have it follow and handicap their ability to earn a living forever.

nice theory..unrealistic, but "nice"....a clean record is crucial in some jobs..mandatory in some...and highly desirable in others...
people who can't manage to follow the laws deserve to have their record closely examined.
The best indicator for future behavior is ....past behavior.

The best indicator for future behavior is ....past behavior.

Totally disagree. Do you behave the way you did when you were twenty?

Employment should be based on qualifications not disqualifiers
 
Why are people so concerned about keeping "drug criminals" locked up? I say let them go.


And unemployed. People who have done their time shouldn't have to have it follow and handicap their ability to earn a living forever.

nice theory..unrealistic, but "nice"....a clean record is crucial in some jobs..mandatory in some...and highly desirable in others...
people who can't manage to follow the laws deserve to have their record closely examined.
The best indicator for future behavior is ....past behavior.

Not really.

yes...really

Well no, really.

You'll find that when a person's economic situation changes so does their behavior.
 
15th post
Why are people so concerned about keeping "drug criminals" locked up? I say let them go.


And unemployed. People who have done their time shouldn't have to have it follow and handicap their ability to earn a living forever.

nice theory..unrealistic, but "nice"....a clean record is crucial in some jobs..mandatory in some...and highly desirable in others...
people who can't manage to follow the laws deserve to have their record closely examined.
The best indicator for future behavior is ....past behavior.

Not really.

yes...really

Well no, really.

You'll find that when a person's economic situation changes so does their behavior.

LMFAO...rich people don't commit crimes?
 
Why are people so concerned about keeping "drug criminals" locked up? I say let them go.


And unemployed. People who have done their time shouldn't have to have it follow and handicap their ability to earn a living forever.

nice theory..unrealistic, but "nice"....a clean record is crucial in some jobs..mandatory in some...and highly desirable in others...
people who can't manage to follow the laws deserve to have their record closely examined.
The best indicator for future behavior is ....past behavior.

The best indicator for future behavior is ....past behavior.

Totally disagree. Do you behave the way you did when you were twenty?

hahahaha..we're talking about crime, not adolescent shenanigans..nice try..won't fly..

Employment should be based on qualifications not disqualifiers
So affirmative action should be abolished immediately, correct?
 
Wow. So now convicts can be hired as federal employees.

Why not? They served their time, didn't they? Why should their entire lifetime be ruined because of a past **** up? If they get out of prison and are unable to find any decent employment and provide for themselves all it does is return many of them to a further life of crime creating a vicious cycle.
 
Back
Top Bottom