Now Here's An Absolute Shocker That Will Sit You Down

Edgetho

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2012
Messages
19,179
Reaction score
11,453
Points
1,255

Wikipedia Bans '100 Percent' of Conservative Media​


Now, I'm not saying that headline is 100% true but it does seem to explain an awful lot of coincidences I find intriguing.

I tend to believe it but don't most of us tend to believe things that reinforce our own standards, our own beliefs? Yes.

Especially when they're true --


Wikipedia has been accused of favoring left-leaning media sources while almost completely blacklisting major conservative outlets, according to a new report by the Media Research Center (MRC) released Monday.
 

Wikipedia Bans '100 Percent' of Conservative Media​


Now, I'm not saying that headline is 100% true but it does seem to explain an awful lot of coincidences I find intriguing.

I tend to believe it but don't most of us tend to believe things that reinforce our own standards, our own beliefs? Yes.

Especially when they're true --


Wikipedia has been accused of favoring left-leaning media sources while almost completely blacklisting major conservative outlets, according to a new report by the Media Research Center (MRC) released Monday.
.

Like two year olds, they will try to demolish everything that stands in the way of gratifying their little juvenile desires.


.
 
I posted a link. Tap on it. You may actually learn something.
.




I do not click the shit posted by left cultists.

It's dangerous. Nearly killed my computer once by doing that.







.
 

Wikipedia Bans '100 Percent' of Conservative Media​


Now, I'm not saying that headline is 100% true but it does seem to explain an awful lot of coincidences I find intriguing.

I tend to believe it but don't most of us tend to believe things that reinforce our own standards, our own beliefs? Yes.

Especially when they're true --


Wikipedia has been accused of favoring left-leaning media sources while almost completely blacklisting major conservative outlets, according to a new report by the Media Research Center (MRC) released Monday.
Good luck with those donations, Wiki.
 
Wikipedia has been accused of favoring left-leaning media sources while almost completely blacklisting major conservative outlets, according to a new report by the Media Research Center (MRC) released Monday.

Wikipedia avoids fake news

 
but you are going to run with it anyway.
I did a deep dive today.

I honestly do not know why Wikileaks won't release or tell us the entire list of Internews Agency members.


2025-02-08_11-17-23.jpg




 
MAGAs believe any garbage flung at them.

Just went on ā€œWikiā€ and looked up Media Research Group. Founded by Brent Bozell, a well known RWNJ.

What else needs to be said.

What needs to be said, is that this is a ad hom/poisoning the well fallacy.


What you need do, is directly address the allegations with substantive facts, not hyperbolic fallacies.
 

Wikipedia Bans '100 Percent' of Conservative Media​


Now, I'm not saying that headline is 100% true but it does seem to explain an awful lot of coincidences I find intriguing.

I tend to believe it but don't most of us tend to believe things that reinforce our own standards, our own beliefs? Yes.

Especially when they're true --


Wikipedia has been accused of favoring left-leaning media sources while almost completely blacklisting major conservative outlets, according to a new report by the Media Research Center (MRC) released Monday.

Wiki is just a user operated web page
It's not a source.
 
In the early days of this board one could go to Wikipedia and create a page, or change one, to support whatever one wanted it to say. I created one once that "proved" that 911 was perpetrated by evil space midgets for example. It was great fun, but that's about it.
 
It’s ā€œtrueā€?

NoiseMax?????????

They make this kind of shit up all the time!

Besides,how does Wikipedia ban anything? It’s not even social media.

Results of Wikipedia study may surprise​



ā€œThe book presents some interesting findings about the way in which a new elite has emerged in the world of communication and about the way in which social media groups evolve,ā€ Matei says. ā€œAdhocracy – the idea that crowdsourcing projects like Wikipedia aren’t these decentralized and spontaneous ventures – is orchestrated by an organizational system that combines a stable power hierarchy with individual mobility.ā€
 
Back
Top Bottom