Mitch, Leonard, be not proud.

[berg80]

The Trumpiest court in America​

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit is where law goes to die.

Dominated by partisans and ideologues — a dozen of the court’s 17 active judgeships are held by Republican appointees, half of whom are Trump judges — the Fifth Circuit is where law goes to die. And, because the Fifth Circuit oversees federal litigation arising out of Texas, whose federal trial courts have become a pipeline for far-right legal decisions, the Fifth Circuit’s judges frequently create havoc with national consequences.

The Fifth Circuit has, in recent months, declared an entire federal agency unconstitutional and stripped another of its authority to enforce federal laws protecting investors from fraud. It permitted Texas Republicans to effectively seize control of content moderation at social media sites like Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube. Less than a year ago, the Fifth Circuit forced the Navy to deploy sailors who defied an order to take the Covid vaccine, despite the Navy’s warning that a sick service member could sideline an entire vessel or force the military to conduct a dangerous mission to extract a Navy SEAL with Covid.

As Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote when the Supreme Court restored the military’s command over its own personnel, the Fifth Circuit’s approach wrongly inserted the courts “into the Navy’s chain of command, overriding military commanders’ professional military judgments.”

The Trumpiest court in America

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit is where law goes to die.

www.vox.com

Trump deserves blame for rubber stamping the recommendations of these unqualified ideologues, but it's Mitch and Leonard Leo who actually knew what they stand for.........and rammed them through the system anyway.

 

[TNHarley]

So, basically, you dont like their rulings, so you whine like a bitch.
Not even considering the reasons for their rulings, or what their fucking jobs ACTUALLY are.

 

[berg80]

So, basically, you dont like their rulings, so you whine like a bitch.
Not even considering the reasons for their rulings, or what their fucking jobs ACTUALLY are.

So you're saying Schlitz Kavanaugh was whining like a bitch when he joined the majority and told the 5th circuit they are Crazy?

As Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote when the Supreme Court restored the military’s command over its own personnel, the Fifth Circuit’s approach wrongly inserted the courts “into the Navy’s chain of command, overriding military commanders’ professional military judgments.”

 

[Harry Dresden]

So, basically, you dont like their rulings, so you whine like a bitch.
Not even considering the reasons for their rulings, or what their fucking jobs ACTUALLY are.

and he isnt considering the 9th circuit and how many times they have been overturned...

 

[TNHarley]

So you're saying Schlitz Kavanaugh was whining like a bitch when he joined the majority and told the 5th circuit they are Crazy?

As Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote when the Supreme Court restored the military’s command over its own personnel, the Fifth Circuit’s approach wrongly inserted the courts “into the Navy’s chain of command, overriding military commanders’ professional military judgments.”

No, im saying you are.

 

[berg80]

So, basically, you dont like their rulings, so you whine like a bitch.
Not even considering the reasons for their rulings, or what their fucking jobs ACTUALLY are.

Aren't you guys the ones who incorrectly whine about the 1st A being violated by social media platforms?

Last week, a deeply chilling case concerning Americans’ First Amendment right to organize protests gained new life. A three-year-old, clearly erroneous decision threatens to bankrupt protest organizers across the political spectrum. But multiple courts keep passing the case among themselves like a hot potato, rather than correcting an obvious error.

At the center of this years-long saga is a conservative federal appeals court’s 2019 decision in Doe v. Mckesson. If it is allowed to stand — or worse, if it is embraced by the Supreme Court — it could potentially chill all public protest in the United States by subjecting the organizers of protests to crippling liability.

That 2019 decision, moreover, is merely the most alarming chapter in a case involving a tragically injured police officer, a prominent civil rights activist, a Trump judge who publicly recanted his own effort to restrict First Amendment rights, and at least four different courts — including the Supreme Court of the United States.

This is what actual cancel culture looks like

Republican judges are waging a bizarre war against the First Amendment right to protest.

www.vox.com

 

[berg80]

and he isnt considering the 9th circuit and how many times they have been overturned...

Overturned by who. Conservatives on the SC?

 

[TNHarley]

Aren't you guys the ones who incorrectly whine about the 1st A being violated by social media platforms?

Last week, a deeply chilling case concerning Americans’ First Amendment right to organize protests gained new life. A three-year-old, clearly erroneous decision threatens to bankrupt protest organizers across the political spectrum. But multiple courts keep passing the case among themselves like a hot potato, rather than correcting an obvious error.

At the center of this years-long saga is a conservative federal appeals court’s 2019 decision in Doe v. Mckesson. If it is allowed to stand — or worse, if it is embraced by the Supreme Court — it could potentially chill all public protest in the United States by subjecting the organizers of protests to crippling liability.

That 2019 decision, moreover, is merely the most alarming chapter in a case involving a tragically injured police officer, a prominent civil rights activist, a Trump judge who publicly recanted his own effort to restrict First Amendment rights, and at least four different courts — including the Supreme Court of the United States.

This is what actual cancel culture looks like

Republican judges are waging a bizarre war against the First Amendment right to protest.

www.vox.com

No, I do not.
Next?

 

[TNHarley]

Overturned by who. Conservatives on the SC?

Many of their overturns were unanimous. This is just one year, boomer.
Furthermore, 10 of the 16 cases that emerged from the Ninth were not voted along ideological lines. 8 of those 10 were unanimous decisions – including cases on immigration and property rights.
In 83-84, they had 25 cases overturned. Guess how many of your partisan boogiemen were on the court during that time?

Supreme Court Hands 9th Circuit Highest Year of Reversals Since 1985

This year, the Supreme Court overturned 15 of the 16 cases originating from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. The largest of the circuits, the Ninth encompasses California, Alaska, Arizona, Guam, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Northern Mariana Islands, Oregon, and Washington. However, 10 of...

www.pacificresearch.org

Retard.

 

[Harry Dresden]

Overturned by who. Conservatives on the SC?

the 9th circuit was pretty liberal for quite a while...even many liberals did not like their rulings.....yea i know you were told differently...

 

[White 6]

So, basically, you dont like their rulings, so you whine like a bitch.
Not even considering the reasons for their rulings, or what their fucking jobs ACTUALLY are.

Sounds like the Supreme Court doesn't think too highly of these political appointees, either.

 

[TNHarley]

Sounds like the Supreme Court doesn't think too highly of these political appointees, either.

Oh, you mean the political appointees from Trump on the SC? Lol
How many cases have been overturned? The 2 most important things he mentioned, hasnt been ruled on. And there is probably a reason for that.