Manhattan judge denies Trump admin bid to unseal Ghislaine Maxwell grand jury transcripts

excalibur

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2015
Messages
28,518
Reaction score
57,679
Points
2,290
And as I have pointed out, there is nothing of import in those grand jury transcripts that isn't matter of public record.

This was just another Democrat/MSM attempt at harming Trump.



US District Judge Paul Engelmayer said the transcripts revealed “next to nothing new” ...

“There is no ‘there’ there,” Engelmayer wrote in his searing 31-page ruling finding that the DOJ failed to make a compelling case to disclose the grand jury testimony, which typically remains sealed.

The “entire premise — that the Maxwell grand jury materials would bring to light meaningful new information about Epstein’s and Maxwell’s crimes, or the Government’s investigation into them — is demonstrably false,” he wrote.

“The court’s review confirmed that unsealing the grand jury materials would not reveal new information of any consequence.”

...

“The materials do not identify any person other than Epstein and Maxwell as having had sexual contact with a minor. They do not discuss or identify any client of Epstein’s or Maxwell’s,” Engelmayer wrote.

"They do not reveal any heretofore unknown means or methods of Epstein’s or Maxwell’s crimes,” he continued. “They do not reveal new venues at which their crimes occurred. They do not reveal new sources of their wealth. They do not explore the circumstances of Epstein’s death. They do not reveal the path of the Government’s investigation.”

...


 
Anyway you slice it....

9306-nobodycares.png
 
This judge is protecting Democrats.
 
And as I have pointed out, there is nothing of import in those grand jury transcripts that isn't matter of public record.

This was just another Democrat/MSM attempt at harming Trump.


US District Judge Paul Engelmayer said the transcripts revealed “next to nothing new” ...
“There is no ‘there’ there,” Engelmayer wrote in his searing 31-page ruling finding that the DOJ failed to make a compelling case to disclose the grand jury testimony, which typically remains sealed.
The “entire premise — that the Maxwell grand jury materials would bring to light meaningful new information about Epstein’s and Maxwell’s crimes, or the Government’s investigation into them — is demonstrably false,” he wrote.
“The court’s review confirmed that unsealing the grand jury materials would not reveal new information of any consequence.”
...
“The materials do not identify any person other than Epstein and Maxwell as having had sexual contact with a minor. They do not discuss or identify any client of Epstein’s or Maxwell’s,” Engelmayer wrote.
"They do not reveal any heretofore unknown means or methods of Epstein’s or Maxwell’s crimes,” he continued. “They do not reveal new venues at which their crimes occurred. They do not reveal new sources of their wealth. They do not explore the circumstances of Epstein’s death. They do not reveal the path of the Government’s investigation.”
...


In other words, no mention of Trump.

There is only one reason to keep this material sealed. So democrats can demand that Trump release the records.
 

Manhattan judge denies Trump admin bid to unseal Ghislaine Maxwell grand jury transcripts​


To be sure, the judge has denied a request by the DOJ to unseal the records.
 
And as I have pointed out, there is nothing of import in those grand jury transcripts that isn't matter of public record.

This was just another Democrat/MSM attempt at harming Trump.


US District Judge Paul Engelmayer said the transcripts revealed “next to nothing new” ...
“There is no ‘there’ there,” Engelmayer wrote in his searing 31-page ruling finding that the DOJ failed to make a compelling case to disclose the grand jury testimony, which typically remains sealed.
The “entire premise — that the Maxwell grand jury materials would bring to light meaningful new information about Epstein’s and Maxwell’s crimes, or the Government’s investigation into them — is demonstrably false,” he wrote.
“The court’s review confirmed that unsealing the grand jury materials would not reveal new information of any consequence.”
...
“The materials do not identify any person other than Epstein and Maxwell as having had sexual contact with a minor. They do not discuss or identify any client of Epstein’s or Maxwell’s,” Engelmayer wrote.
"They do not reveal any heretofore unknown means or methods of Epstein’s or Maxwell’s crimes,” he continued. “They do not reveal new venues at which their crimes occurred. They do not reveal new sources of their wealth. They do not explore the circumstances of Epstein’s death. They do not reveal the path of the Government’s investigation.”
...



That takes care of less than 1% of the file. Let's get to the rest of it.
 
The materials do not identify any person other than Epstein and Maxwell as having had sexual contact with a minor. They do not discuss or identify any client of Epstein’s or Maxwell’s,


The corrupt asshole in black robes denied the request because the transcripts would show that the public is being whipped into a frenzy by democrats for no reason other than partisan politics
 
Back
Top Bottom