Macroevolution

[orogenicman]

Good video. Worth a watch:

 

[PostmodernProph]

lol....so rather than defend your position on the previous thread you simply run away and start another?......

 

[Quantum Windbag]

negged for bei9ng an asswipe

 

[ScienceRocks]

I've come to the conclusion if there's a theory = the same people will argue against it. In the name of his o'mighty god!

 

[ScienceRocks]

Their stance is god does everything and so you don't have to explain it with observations.

 

[orogenicman]

lol....so rather than defend your position on the previous thread you simply run away and start another?......

No comments on the content of the video? Why am I not surprised?

 

[PostmodernProph]

did this one contain any evidence elevating macro-evolution to a subject for scientific study?....

watched it.....lols at the misrepresentation of what we believe about macro-evolution (that a fish will give birth to a monkey)......

so basically this guy thinks he succeeds in the debate by depicting micro-evolution to be macro-evolution and therefore, science.......

why no discussion of the argument that humans evolved from single celled organisms?.....THAT is macro-evolution....not beetles evolving into thousands of species of beetle......

 

[orogenicman]

did this one contain any evidence elevating macro-evolution to a subject for scientific study?....

The fact that you don't believe that thousands of scientists are today studying this in great detail proves that you're head is swimming in a fantasy world. Congratulations.

 

[PostmodernProph]

/shrugs.....studying something is not one of the criteria of the scientific method.......testing it, is.......they can study it and argue about it and even draw pictures of it, but unless they are testing it, it isn't science....

 

[PostmodernProph]

the lowest common denominator of macro-evolution.....the hurdle you must overcome before you have the authority to argue any other aspect of it.....

did a single celled organism ever evolve into a multi-celled organism......

provide evidence in 3.......2.......1......

 

[orogenicman]

/shrugs.....studying something is not one of the criteria of the scientific method.......testing it, is.......they can study it and argue about it and even draw pictures of it, but unless they are testing it, it isn't science....

The fact that you don't believe that thousands of scientists are today TESTING this in great detail proves that you're head is swimming in a fantasy world. Congratulations.

What scientists are saying:

 

[PostmodernProph]

The fact that you don't believe that thousands of scientists are today TESTING this in great detail proves that you're head is swimming in a fantasy world. Congratulations.

can you give me an example of one of these tests of macro-evolution?....

 

[orogenicman]

Wow, more selective amnesia. You poor dear.

 

[PostmodernProph]

right....I forgot that you can't......

 

[orogenicman]

right....I forgot that you can't......

Translation: You didn't watch the video.

More (which you won't bother reading either):

Macroevolution

ENSI/SENSI Papers & Articles:Macroevolution Lessons

Macroevolution: Examples from the Primate World | Learn Science at Scitable

Evidence of Macroevolution

Macroevolution

Macroevolution | The Biodiversity Lab

 

[PostmodernProph]

More (which you won't bother reading either):

if you can't be bothered to write an argument, why should I be bothered to read some article that can't argue back?.....

 

[PostmodernProph]

Macroevolution

ENSI/SENSI Papers & Articles:Macroevolution Lessons

Macroevolution: Examples from the Primate World | Learn Science at Scitable

Evidence of Macroevolution

Macroevolution

Macroevolution | The Biodiversity Lab

FOSSIL EVIDENCE: Don't overlook the abundant fossil evidence, much of it pointing clearly to macroevolution

from one of the above.....do you realize that a fossil is evidence that a creature existed, but not of its transition.....it is not evidence of an evolutionary movement....that comes from non-falsifiable assumptions.....
the rest of the arguments you fear to articulate are no more substantial.....

 

[editec]

Good video. Worth a watch:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nnu-O5x_pRU

Lets just agree that there's shitloads more evidence to support the scientific theories about the development of life on earth than the existence of any of our GODS.

Agreed or no?

 

[PostmodernProph]

Lets just agree that there's shitloads more evidence to support the scientific theories about the development of life on earth than the existence of any of our GODS.

Agreed or no?

no, actually.....that's the point of my argument.....taking something for granted is not the equivalent of proof.......

 

[ScienceRocks]

This is how it happened...
1. God made the earth in a week
2. God made animals and man
3. God sent a snake into a garden
4. The snake got woman to eat apple and humans become self thinking. God was angry!
5. Now we think and make fun of his o'mighty with science!

Truth straight from the horses mouth!