Love the color.....Shelby....

[Freedomisneverfree]

Shelby is a beautiful car....what year do you think this is? I say maybe 1970?

 

[toobfreak]

View attachment 994706

Shelby is a beautiful car....what year do you think this is? I say maybe 1970?

Paint job is a little too much. Detracts from the car. But I'm OK with Candy Apple.

 

[Rocko]

Beautiful

 

[westwall]

Beautiful car, but not a real Shelby.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

View attachment 994706

Shelby is a beautiful car....what year do you think this is? I say maybe 1970?

67

 

[leftwinger]

Too much low rider in that car. Weird shape too? looks more Like a rice rocket married a Chrysler New Yorker Low Rider?

 

[Freedomisneverfree]

Paint job is a little too much. Detracts from the car. But I'm OK with Candy Apple.

I like the color. You are right its beautiful without the other detail.

 

[Concerned American]

67

Don't think so. Maybe a 72 Mach 1

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

Don't think so. Maybe a 72 Mach 1

it's not a shelby
it has regular mustang tail lights
it has a shelby rear spoiler

 

[Concerned American]

it's not a shelby
it has regular mustang tail lights
it has a shelby rear spoiler

View attachment 994755

You're right about the tail lights--still don't think it is as old as 67. too long. I agree, it is not a Shelby. Maybe 70-71,

 

[para bellum]

You're right about the tail lights--still don't think it is as old as 67. too long. I agree, it is not a Shelby. Maybe 70-71,

67 or 68 fastback. The "Bullitt" car.

69-70 had a rear quarter window (among other differences).

71-73 they went to the giant body, no longer a pony car...

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

View attachment 994706

Shelby is a beautiful car....what year do you think this is? I say maybe 1970?

Hideous.