You have just as much knowledge as I do except I have actually handled the stuff; you seem to be glued to the computer 24/7 and always looking over your shoulder for whomever you think is coming to get you next.
Nope. I just finished another interview with a regulatory expert with over 20 years background in lab processes and regulatory compliance. I'm gonna fly him out this week for a face-to-face. Woe is me. I'll have to be away from the computer for an entire day while I determine if this person has the unbiased, scientific engineering background that my clients require in order to assure exacting conformance and compliance in our industry.
The difference between you and I is that my professional background requires me to think outside of the box in all matters if I want my kids (and yours) to be safe when they require a prescription or a hospital visit. yes, we test for all possible known conditions. But what are the potential conditions or events that we don't know about? How do we identify and test them? How do we test for conditions that we haven't identified?
My day is filled with examining requirements and specifications, and then challenging every potential weakness AND negative effect. When someone reports to me "this is how it works, and this is why" my job is to stress it in every possible direction, from every possible angle, and then to stress it again from directions and angles that are unlikely but are possible. Those are the ones that usually get you.
So you can spend your time trying to challenge my credibility. For all you know, I'm in my mothers basement somewhere and I've got a wiki page opened up to help me with terminologies and phrases. That's fine if you think that. I could care less. But the fact remains that the development, scale-up, trials, and production of current vaccines for swine flu in a shorter timeframe than it takes to build a 2,000 sf house is an intolerable risk for any parent who would administer them to a child. Just getting the WFI (Water for Injection) systems online, controlled, tested, and sanitized takes longer than that, not to mention the diluent compounding, filling, cleaning and sanitization skids and respective controls, autoclaves, etc, etc, etc.
Without even discussing the ingredients, there is no possible way that a safe, stable, effective product has been manufactured with any level of assurance.
So here's your next bit of ammunition to use to try to paint me as a conspiracy theorist: Maybe my comments above explain why the swine flu vaccine manufacturers requested (and received) immunity from prosecution from patients who have adverse reactions to the product.
If you plan to have your children vaccinated for the swine flu, do your research before going for the injection. Even if you believe that the negative effects of vaccine ingredients are "conspiracy theories", consider the fast-tracked manufacturing process with no time for proper quality testing and review, and consider that the manufacturers requested and received immunity from prosecution if patients sue them for adverse reactions.
It's as safe as any injection of anything.
Yes, I do think you're in your Mom's basement.
When nothing happens to anybody who has taken the shot, are you going to apologize? No.
You're sole purpose in life is to get a response from people. I gave you a response. You should be delighted.
579 administrations. Not so much as a headache after word. Some coup de'tat you guys have going there. Watch out for the black helicopters. 
