Doc7505
Diamond Member
- Feb 16, 2016
- 23,413
- 41,649
- 2,430
Lawfare vs. law enforcement and Trump vs. Biden
Lawfare vs. law enforcement and Trump vs. Biden
It’s a tale of two Departments of Justice, with about as much contrast between them as you could imagine.
The Dems are absolutely freaking out about the investigations and indictments of everyone involved in telling us we don’t get to elect whom we want. In one of the most brazen examples of projection I have ever seen, the Dems are accusing President Trump of trying to be a king, for seeking retribution against members of “the resistance” who tried to prevent him from assuming and fulfilling the duties of his office.
Duh! Of course he’s seeking retribution. It’s what he’s sworn to do as our chief executive. That’s what that whole “take care that the laws be faithfully executed” thingy in the Constitution means. All legal punishment is retribution for harm done to an individual or to society. It’s the “punishment” part of the crime-punishment equation that deters criminal behavior. The Soros D.A.s must have skipped class on that day.
For any CNN viewers out there, who have been drinking the “retribution” Kool-Aid and thinking The Donald’s actions are starting to look a bit “Hitlery,” let me reassure you. There is no equivalency between what the Biden/Garland DoJ did and what the Trump/Bondi DoJ is doing. The former were practitioners of lawfare, and the latter of law enforcement. One is the use of the law for politics, and the other is use of the law for justice.
~Snip~
The Garland DoJ applied laws in ways never intended (January 6 prosecutions, which have been struck down by the Supreme Court). The Bondi DoJ applies laws exactly as intended by the Legislature (Letitia James mortgage fraud).
Nullification
The Garland DoJ usurped the authority of Congress by refusing to enforce the laws it disagreed with (immigration), effectively nullifying laws by fiat. The Bondi DoJ is honoring its duty under the Constitution by enforcing the laws passed by Congress (immigration).
Selective Enforcement
The Garland DoJ enforced laws based on political affiliation (charging Trump for classified documents possession and excusing Biden for classified documents possession). The Bondi DoJ enforces laws equally regardless of political affiliation (charges were dropped against Eric Adams, a Democrat).
~Snip~
Retribution is the “finding out” that hopefully deters future temptations to “eff around.” That’s why what Trump and Bondi are doing is necessary, regardless of how it appears to the “can’t we all just get along” crowd. The reality is that after the Biden crime wave, we need a bunch more “finding out” to change the risk-reward calculus for future oath-breakers who manage to con their way into office. If Bondi stands down now because it “looks bad,” we’re going to see a lot more Mar-a-Lago panty raids in the future.
Commentary:
Guess one of the biggest stumbling block in holding the 'Deep Stater's' accountable is Miss Pam Bondi would probably have to fire 80% of the DOJ workforce. Just who would you replace them with? The punks coming out of college now? It’s all a big mess that frankly may be unfixable. Especially if no one wants to fix it.
To date, haven't seen anyone actually held accountable yet, although we know major crimes may take time to develop the case. However, many of the crimes have been known for a long time and the evidence has also been around for a long time, particularly in Jim Comey’s case.
When Jack Smith is finally indicted, we'll begin to see the roaches scatter. Surely neither Garland nor Wray have "Get out of Jail Free" cards and will either sing or pay the piper.
I’ll believe justice when I see it.
