Latin America braces for US election

  • Thread starter Thread starter Harpy Eagle
  • Start date Start date
H

Harpy Eagle

Guest

Latin America is anxiously counting the days to Nov. 5, when U.S. voters will choose between relative continuity under Vice President Kamala Harris or a return to policies that triggered volatility in the region's largest markets and economies under former president Donald Trump.
Trade and tariffs, as well as monetary policy's effect on global interest rates, are likely the largest avenues for the election to jolt the U.S.'s neighboring region. Washington's economic war with China could particularly rock Mexico and boost Brazil, especially in a tit-for-tat scenario.
On a broader level, a Trump victory would likely send shockwaves through the region, potentially putting the squeeze on some currencies and central banks even as countries that are more tied to commodities or trade with China could emerge largely unscathed.


An extended tariff war would push more of the countries in our hemisphere closer to China, giving them a larger foothold in our side if the world.

And then there is this...

A Trump presidency is expected to raise the U.S. budget deficit more than a Harris administration, driving inflation, as well as interest rates, higher. Tighter financial conditions globally could also weigh on Latin American assets.
"If Trump wins and the deficits are a bit larger, then the disinflation process could be a bit slower, and that could translate into a slightly slower monetary policy easing" in the U.S., Vontobel's De Sousa said. Tighter monetary policy in the U.S. has historically translated into subdued financial asset prices across emerging markets, including Latin America.
 

Latin America is anxiously counting the days to Nov. 5, when U.S. voters will choose between relative continuity under Vice President Kamala Harris or a return to policies that triggered volatility in the region's largest markets and economies under former president Donald Trump.
Trade and tariffs, as well as monetary policy's effect on global interest rates, are likely the largest avenues for the election to jolt the U.S.'s neighboring region. Washington's economic war with China could particularly rock Mexico and boost Brazil, especially in a tit-for-tat scenario.
On a broader level, a Trump victory would likely send shockwaves through the region, potentially putting the squeeze on some currencies and central banks even as countries that are more tied to commodities or trade with China could emerge largely unscathed.


An extended tariff war would push more of the countries in our hemisphere closer to China, giving them a larger foothold in our side if the world.

And then there is this...

A Trump presidency is expected to raise the U.S. budget deficit more than a Harris administration, driving inflation, as well as interest rates, higher. Tighter financial conditions globally could also weigh on Latin American assets.
"If Trump wins and the deficits are a bit larger, then the disinflation process could be a bit slower, and that could translate into a slightly slower monetary policy easing" in the U.S., Vontobel's De Sousa said. Tighter monetary policy in the U.S. has historically translated into subdued financial asset prices across emerging markets, including Latin America.

Screw them if they're so dependent on our "money policy."

Trump is going to win and there's nothing they can do about it.
 
Screw them if they're so dependent on our "money policy."

Trump is going to win and there's nothing they can do about it.

How to say "I did not even open the link" without using the words.

Well done! :eusa_clap:
 
Under Trump, America - not Latin America - will be the focus of the president's efforts. A welcome change.

Latin American has not been the focus of any presidents efforts since the days of Reagan and Bush I propping up a drug lord dictator.

Then Americans turn around and whine like 3 years olds because China is gaining too much influence in our part of the world.

We are just not a very smart country sometimes.

I see you are another one that did not bother to read the link.
 
How to say "I did not even open the link" without using the words.

Well done! :eusa_clap:

I didn't have to open the link because I've heard it all before. I've been bombarded with the same bullshit for over 8 years now:

"OMG!!!! Trump's gonna blow up the deficit!!"

"OMG!!! Trump's gonna start WW3!!!"

"OMG!!! Trump had two two scoops of ice cream and everyone else only got one!!!

"OMG!!! Trump is literally Hitler!!!"

Screw Latin America. The only thing they've done the last four years is flood my southern border with criminals, rapists, murderers, and drugs. They can all go to hell for all I care.
 
Well, in all fairness, he did do this for sure.

Bullshit. The CCP with their Covid virus did that. And Congress not only sponsored the relief programs, they went along with every dime Trump had to spend.

Do you really think it's the President's job to come up with spending bills?
 
Bullshit. The CCP with their Covid virus did that And Congress not only sponsored the relief programs, they went along with every dime Trump had to spend.

Do you really think it's the President's job to come up with spending bills?

The deficit went up long before COVID was a thing.

It is cute how you do not blame Trump for spending but blame Biden and even Harris as the VP.
 
The deficit went up long before COVID was a thing.

It is cute how you do not blame Trump for spending but blame Biden and even Harris as the VP.

Not really. Trump's deficit was actually lower than Obama's first year, until the pandemic.

Funny how you never mention Biden's deficit though.

Fiscal Data Explains the National Deficit

1729513387432.webp
 
Not really. Trump's deficit was actually lower than Obama's first year, until the pandemic.

Trump's deficit was higher than Obama's last year, which is what it should be compared to....not the one 8 years prior.

And it went up every year.

Funny how you never mention Biden's deficit though.

The first time I see a Dem say Biden does not have high deficits I will jump on them as well.
 
Screw Latin America. The only thing they've done the last four years is flood my southern
border with criminals, rapists, murderers, and drugs. They can all go to hell for all I care.


28609.jpg


Galt...

What would become the US and Latin America share a contiguous landmass since 1620 when the pilgrims arrived in New England.

America's minimum wage has a greater purchasing power than that of her southern neighbors at least since 1860...

Why did it take more than 100 years for those countries to start "invading" America and destroying the country's racial composition?

You're obviously a clueless US citizen barking up the wrong tree.

Neither Mexico nor any other latin american country ever made any lobbying effort to destroy the US white majority in all their History.

Here's a hint who you should be barking at (nothing to do with Latin America):

black-hair-sidelocks-with-beard-mask-wig-jew-hassid-hat.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom