You address one matter in your OP and have it replied to. Then you turn to some other topic in your failed rejoinder.
Let’s see if you can follow along.
One point was the hunger strikes by the detained British subjects. If death ensues, that’s on consequence of their OWN thoughts and actions.
The OTHER topic was the detention of those seven Nritish subjects in the first place (especially without a trial).
Are you capable of grasping that those are two distinct issues?
Also, what is the basis for your claim that their incarceration is simply for “supporting” Palestine?
I mean, sure; GB has trashed the notion of free speech. But is that the reason for the incarceration of the seven being held?