Kamala paid $18.75/vote…Trump paid $5.20/vote

ColonelAngus

Diamond Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2015
Messages
66,295
Reaction score
75,252
Points
3,615
Kamala paid nearly 3x what Trump paid…and still lost.

It might be the worst loss ever in a US election.

$1.4 billion for 74.6 million votes = $18.75/vote

$400 million for 77 million votes = $5.20/vote

It is truly astonishing how much was spent for so few votes by the Democrats. It was a completely incompetent campaign….and she lost to HITLER.
 
Kamala paid nearly 3x what Trump paid…and still lost.

It might be the worst loss ever in a US election.

$1.4 billion for 74.6 million votes = $18.75/vote

$400 million for 77 million votes = $5.20/vote

It is truly astonishing how much was spent for so few votes by the Democrats. It was a completely incompetent campaign….and she lost to HITLER.
Too dang much money spent when there are so many worthy causes it could have been spent on.

But yes, Trump generally knows how to get the most bang from a buck as he demonstrated again and again in his first term and I have no reason to believe the second won't be the same. He utilized the same skills running his current campaign.


On the other hand the estimated $7 trillion the Biden/Harris administration will spend in four yours has accomplished little or nothing that the rank and file American can identify as a good thing or can identify as being spent effectively/efficiently where it was needed. And they were just as wasteful and ineffective spending in their failed campaign.
 
Last edited:
Kamala also received a lot of free help from the Media and Hollywood.
 
Ironically, the people who could use that money most are the socialist sloth that democrats create and thrive on.
I don't see it that way. I look at how many old and crumbling bridges could have been replaced, how it could have been used to promote a healthy economy that would have brought down inflation much more quickly and lowered prices as well, etc. But Democrats don't seem to have either inspiration or aptitude for that. Just spending on useless things and paying off those they owe for the power they have and trying to bribe people to vote for them.

For instance how can we justify Americans living in the streets, not being able to afford groceries or paying their bills, maxing out credit cards because incomes have not kept pace with inflation for four years and think it okay that $25 million was sent to Pakistan to 'strengthen democracy'--does any thinking person believe a single dollar actually went for that?-- and for women's rights even as they forced Americans to accept biological males in women's private spaces and sports. And another $200 million was earmarked for gender equality and 'strengthening democracy' in Pakistan.

That was on top of $10 million for Pakistan women's rights and 'strengthen democracy' the Democrats forced Trump to accept among many other unrelated things before they would allow Trump a COVID relief package in 2020. It fell under their mantra of 'not letting a crisis go to waste.'

All thinking persons know that Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy will have no problem at all identifying and recommending elimination of massive waste and unnecessary spending by government.
 
Last edited:

Kamala paid $18.75/vote…Trump paid $5.20/vote​


Wow, democrats sure work cheap . . . . I would have wanted at least $2,000.00 to vote for Kamala. $40,000.00 would have been even better.
 
I don't see it that way. I look at how many old and crumbling bridges could have been replaced, how it could have been used to promote a healthy economy that would have brought down inflation much more quickly and lowered prices as well, etc. But Democrats don't seem to have either inspiration or aptitude for that. Just spending on useless things and paying off those they owe for the power they have and trying to bribe people to vote for them.

For instance how can we justify Americans living in the streets, not being able to afford groceries or paying their bills, maxing out credit cards because incomes have not kept pace with inflation for four years and think it okay that $25 million was sent to Pakistan to 'strengthen democracy'--does any thinking person believe a single dollar actually went for that?-- and for women's rights even as they forced Americans to accept biological males in women's private spaces and sports. And another $200 million was earmarked for gender equality and 'strengthening democracy' in Pakistan.

That was on top of $10 million for Pakistan women's rights and 'strengthen democracy' the Democrats forced Trump to accept among many other unrelated things before they would allow Trump a COVID relief package in 2020. It fell under their mantra of 'not letting a crisis go to waste.'

All thinking persons know that Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy will have no problem at all identifying and recommending elimination of massive waste and unnecessary spending by government.
You pretty much agreed with my post albeit with more detail.
 
Wow, democrats sure work cheap . . . . I would have wanted at least $2,000.00 to vote for Kamala. $40,000.00 would have been even better.

Oprah got 2 million and she didn’t even have to vote.
 
Oprah got 2 million and she didn’t even have to vote.
Oprah said she didn't get any of that personally though. It all went to cover her expenses for having Kamala on her show and an appearance at a Kamala rally. She had to pay her staff you know. (cough)

Which begs the question: how much would you pay to be on Oprah's show? Isn't it usually more customary for the producers to pay certain guests to appear?
 
Essentially what Kamala did was a billion dollar transfer of wealth from Democrat donors to celebrities. LOL I wonder how much the donors are loving that? :laugh:
Foolishly, Kamala thought the celebs were her pal, but they only flocked for the money
 
Oprah just showed the world what a greedy ***** she is. Net worth of $3 billion and she takes $2 million for a cupcake interview of Kamala. She is a disgrace.
Well, if some numpty offered you $2 million, would you take it? But money does go to money, the more they have, the more they scrounge. The numpties are daft enough to fund the scroungers.
 
15th post
Democrats overspend because they never spend their own money.
 
Kamala paid nearly 3x what Trump paid…and still lost.

It might be the worst loss ever in a US election.

$1.4 billion for 74.6 million votes = $18.75/vote

$400 million for 77 million votes = $5.20/vote

It is truly astonishing how much was spent for so few votes by the Democrats. It was a completely incompetent campaign….and she lost to HITLER.
Which means performance means more to people than $$$$.

Contrary to Democrat rhetoric Trump did a better job as president than Biden and Kamala. And Kamala was incapable of separating herself from Biden's performance as president.

Back pocket politics ruled this election.
Regardless of what the media said about the health of our economy....people felt poorer than they did before Biden was elected.
 
Back
Top Bottom