Is it time to end the Federal Reserve's "independence"?

BellaJones

Rookie
Joined
Nov 19, 2025
Messages
26
Reaction score
24
Points
1
With the recent news about the DOJ investigating Powell over the HQ renovations, it seems the clash between the White House and the Fed is reaching a breaking point. Trump wants lower rates for the midterms, Powell is holding firm.

My question is: Why should an unelected board have more power over our wallets than the person we actually voted for?
 
With the recent news about the DOJ investigating Powell over the HQ renovations, it seems the clash between the White House and the Fed is reaching a breaking point. Trump wants lower rates for the midterms, Powell is holding firm.
My question is: Why should an unelected board have more power over our wallets than the person we actually voted for?
Welcome aboard newbie. You need a link for your OP, (opening post).
Copy this one or put yours up while you can still edit, or a moderator will close your this thread.

Because politicians are not economists. Politicians always lower rates to juice the economy then when inflation hits because of a "bubble" the economy tanks and then rates need to be raised which creates more problems. Its better to keep inflation at about 2% and let the politicians make excuses. A better question is, why the Fed and the House don't address the $39T DEBT?
 
My question is: Why should an unelected board have more power over our wallets than the person we actually voted for?

Because until now Deep State has had the power and resources to keep the Sheeple Herd at a safe distance and at bay.

Now the US Regional HQ is bankrupt ( which means western Europe plus others as well } and, whether deserved or not , the Federal reserve will be the sacrificed institution used as the reason to re-set the whole financial system .

That is , the cyclical nature of our debt system has come full circle .

Trumpfy cannot delay the end for long though he is desperately trying to create fresh collateral to keep the tail wagging a little longer ---- Venezuelan Oil and Greenland mineral deposits are obvious examples of this .

I have been waiting for him to announce the monetisation of all US natural but so far undeveloped resources, regardless of their location and existing legislation .
This would create " imaginary" paper assets on which to continue repaying existing Debt and finance further borrowing through Bonds/ Treasury notes .

Super Monopoly to spell - bind the dear little Sheeplets .
.
 
With the recent news about the DOJ investigating Powell over the HQ renovations, it seems the clash between the White House and the Fed is reaching a breaking point. Trump wants lower rates for the midterms, Powell is holding firm.

My question is: Why should an unelected board have more power over our wallets than the person we actually voted for?
What do you think ?
 
Welcome aboard newbie. You need a link for your OP, (opening post).
Copy this one or put yours up while you can still edit, or a moderator will close your this thread.

Because politicians are not economists. Politicians always lower rates to juice the economy then when inflation hits because of a "bubble" the economy tanks and then rates need to be raised which creates more problems. Its better to keep inflation at about 2% and let the politicians make excuses. A better question is, why the Fed and the House don't address the $39T DEBT?
What are u the fuckin' hall monitor ?
It's a nice post med thread
U
Should be thanking her for showing up.
 
With the recent news about the DOJ investigating Powell over the HQ renovations, it seems the clash between the White House and the Fed is reaching a breaking point. Trump wants lower rates for the midterms, Powell is holding firm.

My question is: Why should an unelected board have more power over our wallets than the person we actually voted for?
I'm an end-the-fed guy, but ...

The only thing that would be worse than an unelected board regulating interest rates would be giving that power to politicians.
 
With the recent news about the DOJ investigating Powell over the HQ renovations, it seems the clash between the White House and the Fed is reaching a breaking point. Trump wants lower rates for the midterms, Powell is holding firm.

My question is: Why should an unelected board have more power over our wallets than the person we actually voted for?
Go bella ! you have friends here !
 
Welcome aboard newbie. You need a link for your OP, (opening post).
Copy this one or put yours up while you can still edit, or a moderator will close your this thread.

Because politicians are not economists. Politicians always lower rates to juice the economy then when inflation hits because of a "bubble" the economy tanks and then rates need to be raised which creates more problems. Its better to keep inflation at about 2% and let the politicians make excuses. A better question is, why the Fed and the House don't address the $39T DEBT?
You close this thread i'm gone.
& i'll take your crowd with me.
 
Dayumn! That's bold talk.
Yeah what the **** !!
thank you.

The overlords of dogooderism should the the post.
Everyone is terrified of this place that's why im trying to merge it.

But god enough rules & links & shit.
Just post relax & enjoy ?
 
With the recent news about the DOJ investigating Powell over the HQ renovations, it seems the clash between the White House and the Fed is reaching a breaking point. Trump wants lower rates for the midterms, Powell is holding firm.

My question is: Why should an unelected board have more power over our wallets than the person we actually voted for?
I just have a statement that anyone who ever thought the fed was "independent" is delusional. If we want to make the stupid claim that they are independent then we should make it so that they are not appointed by partisans. If you are appointed by partisans then you are not independent.
 
I just have a statement that anyone who ever thought the fed was "independent" is delusional. If we want to make the stupid claim that they are independent then we should make it so that they are not appointed by partisans. If you are appointed by partisans then you are not independent.
The chair is nominated bro.
By potus.
 
I'm an end-the-fed guy, but ...

The only thing that would be worse than an unelected board regulating interest rates would be giving that power to politicians.
Me too
They've always been
the area 51 of American money.
I heard global warming hust
drowned fort knox.
 
15th post

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20260123_125648_Google.webp
    Screenshot_20260123_125648_Google.webp
    94.1 KB · Views: 4
Back
Top Bottom