Is it fair to describe Harris-Walz as Communists?

Thunderbird

Gold Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2010
Messages
6,142
Reaction score
2,299
Points
200
Is Harrisist-Walzism the same as Marxist-Leninism?

Are they advocates for an anti-American, authoritarian system?

Let’s look at the facts.







How Kamala Harris helped crush San Francisco's middle class
Harris’s father, like Obama’s father and Buttigieg’s father, was a Marxist.


Harris has supported BLM, a Marxist organization.




So has Walz.


Only enemies of the regime are punished.
 
Last edited:
More on BLM:


 
Is Harrisist-Walzism the same as Marxist-Leninism?

Are they advocates for an anti-American, authoritarian system?

Let’s look at the facts.






How Kamala Harris helped crush San Francisco's middle class
Harris’s father, like Obama’s father and Buttigieg’s father, was a Marxist.


Harris has supported BLM, a Marxist organization.




So has Walz.


Since the statist left now identifies with islam & in doing so have become extremely anti-Semitic, so for that reason I just refer to them as the statist left marxinazis.
 
Communist-Socialist-Marxist is clearly the political "wing" in which Harris-Walz resides. It's academic WHERE within this wing they happen to be. What is clear is that they have no place leading our government.
 
"Communist" is a loaded word and it's best to leave it out of the conversation. There is a Communist Party USA, and no mainline politician would allow itself to be identified with the Communist Party USA.

Socialism, however, is antithetical with our form of government. Socialism is the transfer of wealth from haves to have-nots in order to promote "equality" or in today's parlance, to "fight inequality." The U.S. Constitution makes no provision whatsoever for the transfer of wealth from one group to another. Indeed, if you take the actual document seriously, the Constitution forbids the Federal government from doing that.

Harris and Walz openly and proudly support the transfer of wealth through tax provisions, the social safety net, various grants and loan forgiveness, for example proposing to give first-time home purchasers a small pile of money to make their purchase a little easier. Constitutionally speaking, it is bullshit.

Leave Groucho Marx and John Lennon out of it. Yes, they are basically socialists, trying to push the U.S. government in that direction. Their political existence - both of them - is irrefutable evidence of the U.S. public school system's total failure to teach Civics.
 
Is Harrisist-Walzism the same as Marxist-Leninism?

Are they advocates for an anti-American, authoritarian system?

Let’s look at the facts.







How Kamala Harris helped crush San Francisco's middle class
Harris’s father, like Obama’s father and Buttigieg’s father, was a Marxist.


Harris has supported BLM, a Marxist organization.




So has Walz.


Only enemies of the regime are punished.

Yes, they are Communists. 90% of what's left of the Democrat party are Communists. Most who are not have already left at this point.
 
No. If being a communist would help her win an election then yes she’d be a communist, but she has no real principles beyond obtaining power like most politicians. In reality she’s a corporatist like Biden and everyone else.
 
"Communist" is a loaded word and it's best to leave it out of the conversation. There is a Communist Party USA, and no mainline politician would allow itself to be identified with the Communist Party USA.

Socialism, however, is antithetical with our form of government. Socialism is the transfer of wealth from haves to have-nots in order to promote "equality" or in today's parlance, to "fight inequality." The U.S. Constitution makes no provision whatsoever for the transfer of wealth from one group to another. Indeed, if you take the actual document seriously, the Constitution forbids the Federal government from doing that.

Harris and Walz openly and proudly support the transfer of wealth through tax provisions, the social safety net, various grants and loan forgiveness, for example proposing to give first-time home purchasers a small pile of money to make their purchase a little easier. Constitutionally speaking, it is bullshit.

Leave Groucho Marx and John Lennon out of it. Yes, they are basically socialists, trying to push the U.S. government in that direction. Their political existence - both of them - is irrefutable evidence of the U.S. public school system's total failure to teach Civics.
Here's yous another communist/socialist/Marxist

So this legislation will authorize $200 million per year in down payment assistance to at least 40,000 low-income families. These funds will help American families achieve their goals, and at the same time, strengthen our communities.Dec 16, 2003

President Bush Signs American Dream Downpayment Act of ...​

 
They are more nothings than anything.
 

A Return to Trump's Housing Policies Would Be a Disaster​

1724621774580.webp
The New Republic
https://newrepublic.com › article › trump-hud-housing-...




Feb 21, 2024 — Former President Donald Trump greets Ben Carson, his former HUD secretary, during a campaign event in Sioux City, Iowa.

 
Here's yous another communist/socialist/Marxist

So this legislation will authorize $200 million per year in down payment assistance to at least 40,000 low-income families. These funds will help American families achieve their goals, and at the same time, strengthen our communities.Dec 16, 2003

President Bush Signs American Dream Downpayment Act of ...

All you're doing is showing how the Bushes are just like Obama. That's fine be me. :)
 
"Communist" is a loaded word and it's best to leave it out of the conversation. There is a Communist Party USA, and no mainline politician would allow itself to be identified with the Communist Party USA.

Socialism, however, is antithetical with our form of government. Socialism is the transfer of wealth from haves to have-nots in order to promote "equality" or in today's parlance, to "fight inequality." The U.S. Constitution makes no provision whatsoever for the transfer of wealth from one group to another. Indeed, if you take the actual document seriously, the Constitution forbids the Federal government from doing that.

Harris and Walz openly and proudly support the transfer of wealth through tax provisions, the social safety net, various grants and loan forgiveness, for example proposing to give first-time home purchasers a small pile of money to make their purchase a little easier. Constitutionally speaking, it is bullshit.

Leave Groucho Marx and John Lennon out of it. Yes, they are basically socialists, trying to push the U.S. government in that direction. Their political existence - both of them - is irrefutable evidence of the U.S. public school system's total failure to teach Civics.
Socialism is when the government tries to control everyone's life. Communism is when socialists start taking private property in order to further their socialist ideals.
 
Back
Top Bottom