In Zeal To Prosecute Jack Smith, DOJ Inadvertently Releases Files

skews13

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Messages
11,715
Reaction score
15,789
Points
2,415
The gang that can’t shoot straight just shot itself in the foot (while it was in its mouth) again. DOJ Accidentally Gave Congress ā€˜Damning Evidence’ Against Trump, Jamie Raskin Says:

President Donald Trump took classified documents related to his private business interests from the White House in 2021, according to materials the Justice Department apparently provided to the House Judiciary Committee.
Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), the committee’s top Democrat, suggested in a letter to U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi that the new documents were handed over by mistake in a slapdash effort to discredit the dormant criminal case against Trump.
The documents are some serious sh!t:

ā€œThese new disclosures suggest that Donald Trump stole documents so sensitive that only six people in the entire U.S. government had access to them, that the documents President Trump stole pertained to his business interests, and that Susie Wiles, then the CEO of Donald Trump’s super PAC, witnessed President Trump showing off a classified map to passengers on his private plane,ā€ Raskin said in the letter.


Congratulations jo blondi. You just singlehandedly accomplished what a corrupt federal judge and several billion dollars spent years covering up.

Anybody want to take a guess what's going to happen when Democrats take back the House?

(:
 
The gang that can’t shoot straight just shot itself in the foot (while it was in its mouth) again. DOJ Accidentally Gave Congress ā€˜Damning Evidence’ Against Trump, Jamie Raskin Says:


The documents are some serious sh!t:





Congratulations jo blondi. You just singlehandedly accomplished what a corrupt federal judge and several billion dollars spent years covering up.

Anybody want to take a guess what's going to happen when Democrats take back the House?

(:
I will never understand why Democrats decided to appease MAGA by not tossing the pedophile into prison.
 
I will never understand why Democrats decided to appease MAGA by not tossing the pedophile into prison.
It's because your lying asses don't get convictions you dill!!!

Greg
 
It's because your lying asses don't get convictions you dill!!!

Greg
Hey Greg, your pedophile felon's sentencing date was 10 days before inauguration day. So Democrats decided to hold off and see how elections went and then decided to let it go. Now we're setting up for a 2nd Trump term to end in disaster for the country just like the 1st did.
 
LOL

Nope, just some pathetic cult making a claim, as they do in talking indictments.

Some guy claiming something with zero proof is not worth the bandwidth.
 
LOL

Nope, just some pathetic cult making a claim, as they do in talking indictments.

Some guy claiming something with zero proof is not worth the bandwidth.
When is the last time you read any of the topic material of the thread, before commenting?

1978 or so?
 
The gang that can’t shoot straight just shot itself in the foot (while it was in its mouth) again. DOJ Accidentally Gave Congress ā€˜Damning Evidence’ Against Trump, Jamie Raskin Says:


The documents are some serious sh!t:





Congratulations jo blondi. You just singlehandedly accomplished what a corrupt federal judge and several billion dollars spent years covering up.

Anybody want to take a guess what's going to happen when Democrats take back the House?

(:
This time you finally got him!
 
We are still a nation of laws, not wishful thinking by people like you, so we don't just toss people into prison.

But we get it, you're a Marxist/Mohammedan, the green & the red.
He was convicted and a cowardly judge decided to set aside the laws of the nation. You know, those thingies you just claim to care about.
 
I mean, we all know that Trump as POTUS declassified any of that alleged stuff prior to leaving office. Duh.

The President can declassify anything at any time.

Clinton had recorded conversations with diplomats and heads of state, and the District Court in the DC said, no problem, they were his. And that is why Jack Smith indicted in Florida, because had he done so in DC, that Clinton case was clear precedent.
 
He was convicted and a cowardly judge decided to set aside the laws of the nation. You know, those thingies you just claim to care about.


Convicted of what? I think you are confused, there was never any conviction in Federal Court. There wasn't even a trial.
 
Convicted of what? I think you are confused, there was never any conviction in Federal Court. There wasn't even a trial.
Aha convicted of what... :rolleyes:

MAGAs are the dumbest humans to ever live
 
The gang that can’t shoot straight just shot itself in the foot (while it was in its mouth) again. DOJ Accidentally Gave Congress ā€˜Damning Evidence’ Against Trump, Jamie Raskin Says:


The documents are some serious sh!t:





Congratulations jo blondi. You just singlehandedly accomplished what a corrupt federal judge and several billion dollars spent years covering up.

Anybody want to take a guess what's going to happen when Democrats take back the House?

(:
They keep posting stuff proving they are trying to overthrow the government we elected.
 
15th post
The gang that can’t shoot straight just shot itself in the foot (while it was in its mouth) again. DOJ Accidentally Gave Congress ā€˜Damning Evidence’ Against Trump, Jamie Raskin Says:


The documents are some serious sh!t:





Congratulations jo blondi. You just singlehandedly accomplished what a corrupt federal judge and several billion dollars spent years covering up.

Anybody want to take a guess what's going to happen when Democrats take back the House?

(:
Judge Cannon covered up all the evidence against Trump
If you prosecute Smith, he can enter it in his defense
 
Aha convicted of what... :rolleyes:

MAGAs are the dumbest humans to ever live


You wrote the below post.

He was convicted and a cowardly judge decided to set aside the laws of the nation. You know, those thingies you just claim to care about.


So, where was this conviction in which a judge 'set aside the laws of the nation'? Do tell the board.
 
Back
Top Bottom