PoliticalChic
Diamond Member
...well, you wouldn't be a Democrat.
The last decade or so had taught the rest of us:
1. .....a simple rule that will clarify the current milieu:
Any article, event, opinion, data or study that redounds in favor of the Left/Demorat Party, is to be considered a lie or hoax.
2. Don't believe anyone, no matter their credentials, without checking for yourself.
Otherwise, you will vote Democrat.
Experts, 'scientists,' bureaucrats ...don't make the mistake of assigning a higher level of integrity and honesty to any of them, than anyone else. Not politicians, bureaucrats, economists, pastors....whatever. ..know that they have been forced to embrace the collective, oppose the separation of powers, and or checks and balances, and the result is a tyranny of the elites .
3. And that brings me to what are called "scientists.
If the pronouncements of the 'medical experts' who advanced the Covid scam didn't teach you the truth of the above, .....
"In September, I wrote about how that month’s issue of Scientific American issued its second-ever presidential endorsement. Not shockingly, the first endorsement was for Joe Biden in 2020, and the second one was for Kamala Harris.
4. “It’s telling that the scientists at Scientific American are so beholden to the left, which means that there’s no room for other opinions or theories in their closed minds,” I wrote at the time. Toby Young went further, calling the endorsement “not a choice dictated by science, but by theology.”
Scientific American’s editor-in-chief Laura Helmuth took to Bluesky, the left’s latest attempt to create a social media echo chamber, to trash Trump supporters and generally stomp her feet and pout that the election didn’t go her way. She called Trump voters the “meanest, dumbest, most bigoted group of fascists.” I wonder what scientific study she has to prove that hypothesis.
The last decade or so had taught the rest of us:
1. .....a simple rule that will clarify the current milieu:
Any article, event, opinion, data or study that redounds in favor of the Left/Demorat Party, is to be considered a lie or hoax.
2. Don't believe anyone, no matter their credentials, without checking for yourself.
Otherwise, you will vote Democrat.
Experts, 'scientists,' bureaucrats ...don't make the mistake of assigning a higher level of integrity and honesty to any of them, than anyone else. Not politicians, bureaucrats, economists, pastors....whatever. ..know that they have been forced to embrace the collective, oppose the separation of powers, and or checks and balances, and the result is a tyranny of the elites .
3. And that brings me to what are called "scientists.
If the pronouncements of the 'medical experts' who advanced the Covid scam didn't teach you the truth of the above, .....
"In September, I wrote about how that month’s issue of Scientific American issued its second-ever presidential endorsement. Not shockingly, the first endorsement was for Joe Biden in 2020, and the second one was for Kamala Harris.
4. “It’s telling that the scientists at Scientific American are so beholden to the left, which means that there’s no room for other opinions or theories in their closed minds,” I wrote at the time. Toby Young went further, calling the endorsement “not a choice dictated by science, but by theology.”
Scientific American’s editor-in-chief Laura Helmuth took to Bluesky, the left’s latest attempt to create a social media echo chamber, to trash Trump supporters and generally stomp her feet and pout that the election didn’t go her way. She called Trump voters the “meanest, dumbest, most bigoted group of fascists.” I wonder what scientific study she has to prove that hypothesis.
