If the USA had just shot the Southern attackers for treason,

[Ravi]

instead of engaging in war for the theft of national lands and attacks on United States citizens, would the Confederate apologists still be whining or would we have been well past their century plus whine fest?

 

[Valerie]

"would we have been well past their century plus whine fest?"


doubtful...

 

[Kevin_Kennedy]

How do you shoot the Confederates who orchestrated the secession without going to war? It doesn't seem likely that they'd simply turn themselves in or let Union soldiers come hang them in their own states.

 

[Ravi]

How do you shoot the Confederates who orchestrated the secession without going to war? It doesn't seem likely that they'd simply turn themselves in or let Union soldiers come hang them in their own states.

Execute them on the spot for attacking US interests.

 

[Porker]

instead of engaging in war for the theft of national lands and attacks on United States citizens, would the Confederate apologists still be whining or would we have been well past their century plus whine fest?

It took them 4 years to defeat the Confederacy even though the Southern army was outnumbered more than 3 to 1. No arms/ammunition plants in the south, no rail system to speak of and still fought a war that lasted four years. I don't believe it would have been simple to just execute a few people for treason except maybe in your weak ass mind. Next....

 

[Ravi]

instead of engaging in war for the theft of national lands and attacks on United States citizens, would the Confederate apologists still be whining or would we have been well past their century plus whine fest?

It took them 4 years to defeat the Confederacy even though the Southern army was outnumbered more than 3 to 1. No arms/ammunition plants in the south, no rail system to speak of and still fought a war that lasted four years. I don't believe it would have been simple to just execute a few people for treason except maybe in your weak ass mind. Next....

I didn't say it would be simple. If there was no war fought, however, the Cons wouldn't feel like such losers. Nipping the idiocy in the bud by executing traitors on the spot seems like it would have been a better idea. No one whines and moans about the Whiskey Rebellion.

 

[Porker]

instead of engaging in war for the theft of national lands and attacks on United States citizens, would the Confederate apologists still be whining or would we have been well past their century plus whine fest?

It took them 4 years to defeat the Confederacy even though the Southern army was outnumbered more than 3 to 1. No arms/ammunition plants in the south, no rail system to speak of and still fought a war that lasted four years. I don't believe it would have been simple to just execute a few people for treason except maybe in your weak ass mind. Next....

I didn't say it would be simple. If there was no war fought, however, the Cons wouldn't feel like such losers. Nipping the idiocy in the bud by executing traitors on the spot seems like it would have been a better idea. No one whines and moans about the Whiskey Rebellion.

This is it...you are too GD stupid to communicate with. By the way...do you even have an IQ?

 

[Ernie S.]

How do you shoot the Confederates who orchestrated the secession without going to war? It doesn't seem likely that they'd simply turn themselves in or let Union soldiers come hang them in their own states.

Execute them on the spot for attacking US interests.

They didn't attack US interests. They formed a separate nation which the North invaded.

 

[deltex1]

How do you shoot the Confederates who orchestrated the secession without going to war? It doesn't seem likely that they'd simply turn themselves in or let Union soldiers come hang them in their own states.

Execute them on the spot for attacking US interests.

We could do that now to LIBTARDS.

 

[TheOldSchool]

How do you shoot the Confederates who orchestrated the secession without going to war? It doesn't seem likely that they'd simply turn themselves in or let Union soldiers come hang them in their own states.

Execute them on the spot for attacking US interests.

They didn't attack US interests. They formed a separate nation which the North invaded.

And then proceeded to thoroughly whup.

 

[Ernie S.]

With the exception of Gettysburg, all major battles were in Confederate territory. The Union invaded a foreign country.

 

[Ernie S.]

How do you shoot the Confederates who orchestrated the secession without going to war? It doesn't seem likely that they'd simply turn themselves in or let Union soldiers come hang them in their own states.

Execute them on the spot for attacking US interests.

They didn't attack US interests. They formed a separate nation which the North invaded.

And then proceeded to thoroughly whup.

They did, but why was the Civil War a just war and Iraq an unjust war?

 

[Ravi]

How do you shoot the Confederates who orchestrated the secession without going to war? It doesn't seem likely that they'd simply turn themselves in or let Union soldiers come hang them in their own states.

Execute them on the spot for attacking US interests.

They didn't attack US interests. They formed a separate nation which the North invaded.

Well, no. They attempted to steal US property.

 

[TheOldSchool]

How do you shoot the Confederates who orchestrated the secession without going to war? It doesn't seem likely that they'd simply turn themselves in or let Union soldiers come hang them in their own states.

Execute them on the spot for attacking US interests.

They didn't attack US interests. They formed a separate nation which the North invaded.

And then proceeded to thoroughly whup.

They did, but why was the Civil War a just war and Iraq an unjust war?

One war saved America, and the other was a foreign policy disaster that turned the entire world against us.

 

[Mr Natural]

They attacked a US facility.

Today, we call that terrorism and is punishable by death,.

 

[Ernie S.]

How do you shoot the Confederates who orchestrated the secession without going to war? It doesn't seem likely that they'd simply turn themselves in or let Union soldiers come hang them in their own states.

Execute them on the spot for attacking US interests.

They didn't attack US interests. They formed a separate nation which the North invaded.

Well, no. They attempted to steal US property.

No, they didn't. With the exception of a few forts, the US government owned nothing in the Confederacy.

 

[Ernie S.]

How do you shoot the Confederates who orchestrated the secession without going to war? It doesn't seem likely that they'd simply turn themselves in or let Union soldiers come hang them in their own states.

Execute them on the spot for attacking US interests.

They didn't attack US interests. They formed a separate nation which the North invaded.

And then proceeded to thoroughly whup.

They did, but why was the Civil War a just war and Iraq an unjust war?

One war saved America, and the other was a foreign policy disaster that turned the entire world against us.

Saved the union, perhaps. Saved America is debatable.

 

[Ernie S.]

They attacked a US facility.

Today, we call that terrorism and is punishable by death,.

A union fort in a foreign country...

 

[TheOldSchool]

Execute them on the spot for attacking US interests.

They didn't attack US interests. They formed a separate nation which the North invaded.

And then proceeded to thoroughly whup.

They did, but why was the Civil War a just war and Iraq an unjust war?

One war saved America, and the other was a foreign policy disaster that turned the entire world against us.

Saved the union, perhaps. Saved America is debatable.

Yeah if you ignore the subsequent 150 years of American history

 

[Ravi]

How do you shoot the Confederates who orchestrated the secession without going to war? It doesn't seem likely that they'd simply turn themselves in or let Union soldiers come hang them in their own states.

Execute them on the spot for attacking US interests.

They didn't attack US interests. They formed a separate nation which the North invaded.

Well, no. They attempted to steal US property.

No, they didn't. With the exception of a few forts, the US government owned nothing in the Confederacy.

A few forts is still a few forts. Taking property belonging to the US government in those circumstances is an act of treason. Or if you'd rather, terrorism.