If Eric Ciaramella really is the whistleblower, the whole impeachment narrative is decimated

[Billiejeens]

The purpose of being a “whistleblower” is to expose wrongdoing perpetrated by people in power whose actions are being concealed from the public, oversight officials, and/or law enforcement. It is never to be used for political gain, whether personal or on behalf of others. It is also not supposed to be used as a ploy against one’s political opponents or the political opponents of those with whom the whistleblower is attached.

In other words, blowing the whistle is not supposed to be weaponized for political purposes, but if it turns out CIA operative Eric Ciaramella is the Ukraine whistleblower, his report can only be viewed as an attempted political assassination. We know this because he has been actively involved in multiple attempts to take down the President even before he was elected. He is the “Deep State” pawn many on the right have condemned, a pawn who has reported multiple instances of the President’s “wrongdoings” which invariably turned out to be false.

If anyone can be less credible than Adam Schiff, it’s Eric Ciaramella. When other news outlets pointed out the whistleblower was a Democrat, I shrugged. No big deal. A person’s allegiance to an opposing party does not eliminate credibility in and of itself. But when it was revealed that he worked for former Vice President Joe Biden, his credibility started slipping away, even in the eyes of skeptics like me. Now, we’re learning he has a long history of attempts to expose President Trump, including getting fired from the NSC for leaking information to the press. His attachments to John Brennan, Adam Schiff, Susan Rice, and others who have worked against the President is the cherry on top of the obliteration of his credibility.




If Eric Ciaramella really is the whistleblower, the whole impeachment narrative is decimated

 

[konradv]

What's this "if" stuff? How about getting some real evidence before smearing the guy?

 

[iamwhatiseem]

What's this "if" stuff? How about getting some real evidence before smearing the guy?

I know right??
All the Democrats have done is smear Trump without real evidence.
Glad you see it too.

 

[konradv]

What's this "if" stuff? How about getting some real evidence before smearing the guy?

I know right?? All the Democrats have done is smear Trump without real evidence. Glad you see it too.

You obviously don't "know" much. All Trump and his minions have been doing is impede the gathering of evidence. Isn't that what known as "consciousness of guilt"?

 

[SassyIrishLass]

What's this "if" stuff? How about getting some real evidence before smearing the guy?

The demoquacks should take that advice regarding Trump

 

[Jitss617]

Democrats leave the president alone ,, you are destroying this country with your antics

 

[Crepitus]

The purpose of being a “whistleblower” is to expose wrongdoing perpetrated by people in power whose actions are being concealed from the public, oversight officials, and/or law enforcement. It is never to be used for political gain, whether personal or on behalf of others. It is also not supposed to be used as a ploy against one’s political opponents or the political opponents of those with whom the whistleblower is attached.

In other words, blowing the whistle is not supposed to be weaponized for political purposes, but if it turns out CIA operative Eric Ciaramella is the Ukraine whistleblower, his report can only be viewed as an attempted political assassination. We know this because he has been actively involved in multiple attempts to take down the President even before he was elected. He is the “Deep State” pawn many on the right have condemned, a pawn who has reported multiple instances of the President’s “wrongdoings” which invariably turned out to be false.

If anyone can be less credible than Adam Schiff, it’s Eric Ciaramella. When other news outlets pointed out the whistleblower was a Democrat, I shrugged. No big deal. A person’s allegiance to an opposing party does not eliminate credibility in and of itself. But when it was revealed that he worked for former Vice President Joe Biden, his credibility started slipping away, even in the eyes of skeptics like me. Now, we’re learning he has a long history of attempts to expose President Trump, including getting fired from the NSC for leaking information to the press. His attachments to John Brennan, Adam Schiff, Susan Rice, and others who have worked against the President is the cherry on top of the obliteration of his credibility.




If Eric Ciaramella really is the whistleblower, the whole impeachment narrative is decimated

A. It's just speculation.

B. It wouldn't matter anyway. The whistleblower's job is to bring wrongdoing to the attention of the correct authorities to investigation. The investigation in this matter has not only confirmed the original concern but uncovered even more thanks to witness testimony.

 

[Billiejeens]

What's this "if" stuff? How about getting some real evidence before smearing the guy?

I know right?? All the Democrats have done is smear Trump without real evidence. Glad you see it too.

You obviously don't "know" much. All Trump and his minions have been doing is impede the gathering of evidence. Isn't that what known as "consciousness of guilt"?

No President in history has been more open and transparent.

The White House provided a million and a half documents to the Mueller people and claimed executive privilege on no one.
Everyone was allowed to speak with Mueller.
He released the entire transcript of this call.

You seem like a child.

 

[Crepitus]

Democrats leave the president alone ,, you are destroying this country with your antics

Bullshit, we are trying to save our country from a wannabe tin pot dictator.

 

[Crepitus]

What's this "if" stuff? How about getting some real evidence before smearing the guy?

I know right?? All the Democrats have done is smear Trump without real evidence. Glad you see it too.

You obviously don't "know" much. All Trump and his minions have been doing is impede the gathering of evidence. Isn't that what known as "consciousness of guilt"?

No President in history has been more open and transparent.

The White House provided a million and a half documents to the Mueller people and claimed executive privilege on no one.
Everyone was allowed to speak with Mueller.
He released the entire transcript of this call.

You seem like a child.

Lol!!

tRump tell you that?

He lies, you know.

 

[Billiejeens]

The purpose of being a “whistleblower” is to expose wrongdoing perpetrated by people in power whose actions are being concealed from the public, oversight officials, and/or law enforcement. It is never to be used for political gain, whether personal or on behalf of others. It is also not supposed to be used as a ploy against one’s political opponents or the political opponents of those with whom the whistleblower is attached.

In other words, blowing the whistle is not supposed to be weaponized for political purposes, but if it turns out CIA operative Eric Ciaramella is the Ukraine whistleblower, his report can only be viewed as an attempted political assassination. We know this because he has been actively involved in multiple attempts to take down the President even before he was elected. He is the “Deep State” pawn many on the right have condemned, a pawn who has reported multiple instances of the President’s “wrongdoings” which invariably turned out to be false.

If anyone can be less credible than Adam Schiff, it’s Eric Ciaramella. When other news outlets pointed out the whistleblower was a Democrat, I shrugged. No big deal. A person’s allegiance to an opposing party does not eliminate credibility in and of itself. But when it was revealed that he worked for former Vice President Joe Biden, his credibility started slipping away, even in the eyes of skeptics like me. Now, we’re learning he has a long history of attempts to expose President Trump, including getting fired from the NSC for leaking information to the press. His attachments to John Brennan, Adam Schiff, Susan Rice, and others who have worked against the President is the cherry on top of the obliteration of his credibility.




If Eric Ciaramella really is the whistleblower, the whole impeachment narrative is decimated

A. It's just speculation.

B. It wouldn't matter anyway. The whistleblower's job is to bring wrongdoing to the attention of the correct authorities to investigation. The investigation in this matter has not only confirmed the original concern but uncovered even more thanks to witness testimony.

You continue to be the least informed person in the group
Least amount of critical thinking skills

 

[iamwhatiseem]

What's this "if" stuff? How about getting some real evidence before smearing the guy?

I know right?? All the Democrats have done is smear Trump without real evidence. Glad you see it too.

You obviously don't "know" much. All Trump and his minions have been doing is impede the gathering of evidence. Isn't that what known as "consciousness of guilt"?

 

[Billiejeens]

What's this "if" stuff? How about getting some real evidence before smearing the guy?

I know right?? All the Democrats have done is smear Trump without real evidence. Glad you see it too.

You obviously don't "know" much. All Trump and his minions have been doing is impede the gathering of evidence. Isn't that what known as "consciousness of guilt"?

No President in history has been more open and transparent.

The White House provided a million and a half documents to the Mueller people and claimed executive privilege on no one.
Everyone was allowed to speak with Mueller.
He released the entire transcript of this call.

You seem like a child.

Lol!!

tRump tell you that?

He lies, you know.

Mueller told me
(although he has been known to tell some whoppers)

 

[Jitss617]

Democrats leave the president alone ,, you are destroying this country with your antics

Bullshit, we are trying to save our country from a wannabe tin pot dictator.

Yes deregulating everything promoting the second amendment free speech is really dictating look in the mirror retard you are the dictators, leave the guy alone . You been warned

 

[Billiejeens]

Democrats leave the president alone ,, you are destroying this country with your antics

Bullshit, we are trying to save our country from a wannabe tin pot dictator.

Yes deregulating everything promoting the second amendment free speech is really dictating look in the mirror retard you are the dictators, leave the guy alone . You been warned

Well said
That creepy person seems absolutely retarded.

 

[blastoff]

What's this "if" stuff? How about getting some real evidence before smearing the guy?

Yeah, let’s at least hold ‘em to the Kavanaugh Standards!

 

[Maxdeath]

Seems you have a problem with your impeachment theroy when the head of it wont allow questions to be answered. When no vote has still been taken and the only thing up for vote is if the rules set forth so far are good enough.

 

[justoffal]

What's this "if" stuff? How about getting some real evidence before smearing the guy?

I know right?? All the Democrats have done is smear Trump without real evidence. Glad you see it too.

You obviously don't "know" much. All Trump and his minions have been doing is impede the gathering of evidence. Isn't that what known as "consciousness of guilt"?

They're not gathering evidence they're manufacturing it. That's why they're being stonewalled. Obama did much the same to his detractors.... Still doing it to this day in fact.

Jo

 

[konradv]

What's this "if" stuff? How about getting some real evidence before smearing the guy?

I know right?? All the Democrats have done is smear Trump without real evidence. Glad you see it too.

You obviously don't "know" much. All Trump and his minions have been doing is impede the gathering of evidence. Isn't that what known as "consciousness of guilt"?

No President in history has been more open and transparent. The White House provided a million and a half documents to the Mueller people and claimed executive privilege on no one.
Everyone was allowed to speak with Mueller. He released the entire transcript of this call. You seem like a child.

Nice try at deflection, but this isn't about Mueller and why do we need your word on the transcript when we've got an a person testifying who actually listened to the call and tried to warn the president? What we've got here is someone that thinks they're a genius and won't listen to those who know what they're talking about.

 

[Polishprince]

The purpose of being a “whistleblower” is to expose wrongdoing perpetrated by people in power whose actions are being concealed from the public, oversight officials, and/or law enforcement. It is never to be used for political gain, whether personal or on behalf of others. It is also not supposed to be used as a ploy against one’s political opponents or the political opponents of those with whom the whistleblower is attached.

In other words, blowing the whistle is not supposed to be weaponized for political purposes, but if it turns out CIA operative Eric Ciaramella is the Ukraine whistleblower, his report can only be viewed as an attempted political assassination. We know this because he has been actively involved in multiple attempts to take down the President even before he was elected. He is the “Deep State” pawn many on the right have condemned, a pawn who has reported multiple instances of the President’s “wrongdoings” which invariably turned out to be false.

If anyone can be less credible than Adam Schiff, it’s Eric Ciaramella. When other news outlets pointed out the whistleblower was a Democrat, I shrugged. No big deal. A person’s allegiance to an opposing party does not eliminate credibility in and of itself. But when it was revealed that he worked for former Vice President Joe Biden, his credibility started slipping away, even in the eyes of skeptics like me. Now, we’re learning he has a long history of attempts to expose President Trump, including getting fired from the NSC for leaking information to the press. His attachments to John Brennan, Adam Schiff, Susan Rice, and others who have worked against the President is the cherry on top of the obliteration of his credibility.




If Eric Ciaramella really is the whistleblower, the whole impeachment narrative is decimated

Someone with the surname of "Ciaramella" would know a little bit about the code of omertà and what happens to snitches.

On that basis, I think he may be a Trump confederate acting as a mole inside the Schiff faction, reporting back to President Trump since the beginning.

Sort of like when Marlon Brando asked his friend Luca Brasi to probe around his enemies and find out what he could find out.