Idiot Nation Test! Surgeon Covers Up Absurd FBI Story By Saying Charlie Kirk Must Have Been "Man of Steel" to Stop Grizzly Round

[charlottebronte666]

A 30-06 bullet that the FBI says hit Charlie would blow through not only an elk but the elk standing behind it. It is a high-powered weapon of the kind you need to take down a grizzly bear, which can have a skull the thickess of armor plate. What hit Charlie hit him from behind, not the front like the FBI says, and it was most definitely not a 30-06. You don't have to know much about hunting to know that. It was a smaller round that would punch right through, says Marine sniper and ballistics instructor Zeb Boykin, who did one of the first analyses. Boykin found the frame where you can actually see the bullet coming in from Charlies right, behind him, not from the front. The blood that was pouring out the front of his neck is from an exit wound. The FBI is lying about who shot Charlie.

Marine sniper Zeb Boykin

Surgeon calls Charlie Kirk ‘man of steel’ — reveals ‘miracle’ factor that likely prevented more from being hurt

“Even in death, Charlie managed to save the lives of those around him. Remarkable. Miraculous,” said a Turning Point USA spokesman.

nypost.com

"“I just spoke with the surgeon who worked on Charlie in the hospital … He said the bullet ‘absolutely should have gone through, which is very very normal for a high-powered, high-velocity round,’ ” Kolvet said. ” ‘I’ve seen wounds from this caliber many times and they always just go through everything. This would have taken a moose or two down, an elk, etc.’...” ‘It was an absolute miracle that someone else didn’t get killed,’ ” Kolvet said the doctor told him. ” ‘His bone was so healthy and the density was so so impressive that he’s like the man of steel. "

 

[yidnar]

A 30-06 bullet that the FBI says hit Charlie would blow through not only an elk but the elk standing behind it. It is a high-powered weapon of the kind you need to take down a grizzly bear, which has a skull the thinness of armor plate. What hit Charlie hit him from behind, not the front like the FBI says, and it was most definitely not a 30-06. You don't have to know much about hunting to know that. It was a smaller round that would punch right through, says Marine sniper and ballistics instructor Zeb Boykin, who did one of the first analyses. Boykin found the frame where you can actually see the bullet coming in from Charlies right, behind him, not from the front like the FBI said. The blood that was pouring out is from an exit wound. The FBI is lying about who shot Charlie.

Marine sniper Zeb Boykin

Surgeon calls Charlie Kirk ‘man of steel’ — reveals ‘miracle’ factor that likely prevented more from being hurt

“Even in death, Charlie managed to save the lives of those around him. Remarkable. Miraculous,” said a Turning Point USA spokesman.

nypost.com

"“I just spoke with the surgeon who worked on Charlie in the hospital … He said the bullet ‘absolutely should have gone through, which is very very normal for a high-powered, high-velocity round,’ ” Kolvet said. ” ‘I’ve seen wounds from this caliber many times and they always just go through everything. This would have taken a moose or two down, an elk, etc.’...” ‘It was an absolute miracle that someone else didn’t get killed,’ ” Kolvet said the doctor told him. ” ‘His bone was so healthy and the density was so so impressive that he’s like the man of steel. "

if it hit him from behind the exit wound would have been larger than the wound that was sustained in the front .. and your comment about a 30 06 being used for grizzlies .. I wouldn't trust that round unless it was a head shot .. learn a little about ballistics before you post ..

 

[charlottebronte666]

if it hit him from behind the exit wound would have been larger than the wound that was sustained in the front .. and your comment about a 30 06 being used for grizzlies .. I wouldn't trust that round unless it was a head shot .. learn a little about ballistics before you post ..

If it hit him from behind than the front wound IS the exit would, retard. And you know less than nothing about ballistics if you think what hit was was a 30-06. His head would have exploded.

 

[ThisIsMe]

A 30-06 bullet that the FBI says hit Charlie would blow through not only an elk but the elk standing behind it. It is a high-powered weapon of the kind you need to take down a grizzly bear, which can have a skull the thickess of armor plate. What hit Charlie hit him from behind, not the front like the FBI says, and it was most definitely not a 30-06. You don't have to know much about hunting to know that. It was a smaller round that would punch right through, says Marine sniper and ballistics instructor Zeb Boykin, who did one of the first analyses. Boykin found the frame where you can actually see the bullet coming in from Charlies right, behind him, not from the front. The blood that was pouring out the front of his neck is from an exit wound. The FBI is lying about who shot Charlie.

Marine sniper Zeb Boykin

Surgeon calls Charlie Kirk ‘man of steel’ — reveals ‘miracle’ factor that likely prevented more from being hurt

“Even in death, Charlie managed to save the lives of those around him. Remarkable. Miraculous,” said a Turning Point USA spokesman.

nypost.com

"“I just spoke with the surgeon who worked on Charlie in the hospital … He said the bullet ‘absolutely should have gone through, which is very very normal for a high-powered, high-velocity round,’ ” Kolvet said. ” ‘I’ve seen wounds from this caliber many times and they always just go through everything. This would have taken a moose or two down, an elk, etc.’...” ‘It was an absolute miracle that someone else didn’t get killed,’ ” Kolvet said the doctor told him. ” ‘His bone was so healthy and the density was so so impressive that he’s like the man of steel. "

this special forces sniper disagrees. He actually did a video with zeb yesterday.

- YouTube

Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.

www.youtube.com

 

[ThisIsMe]

A 30-06 bullet that the FBI says hit Charlie would blow through not only an elk but the elk standing behind it. It is a high-powered weapon of the kind you need to take down a grizzly bear, which can have a skull the thickess of armor plate. What hit Charlie hit him from behind, not the front like the FBI says, and it was most definitely not a 30-06. You don't have to know much about hunting to know that. It was a smaller round that would punch right through, says Marine sniper and ballistics instructor Zeb Boykin, who did one of the first analyses. Boykin found the frame where you can actually see the bullet coming in from Charlies right, behind him, not from the front. The blood that was pouring out the front of his neck is from an exit wound. The FBI is lying about who shot Charlie.

Marine sniper Zeb Boykin

Surgeon calls Charlie Kirk ‘man of steel’ — reveals ‘miracle’ factor that likely prevented more from being hurt

“Even in death, Charlie managed to save the lives of those around him. Remarkable. Miraculous,” said a Turning Point USA spokesman.

nypost.com

"“I just spoke with the surgeon who worked on Charlie in the hospital … He said the bullet ‘absolutely should have gone through, which is very very normal for a high-powered, high-velocity round,’ ” Kolvet said. ” ‘I’ve seen wounds from this caliber many times and they always just go through everything. This would have taken a moose or two down, an elk, etc.’...” ‘It was an absolute miracle that someone else didn’t get killed,’ ” Kolvet said the doctor told him. ” ‘His bone was so healthy and the density was so so impressive that he’s like the man of steel. "

Also, I dont see how the bullet came from behind. The angle would be too steep. The shooter would not even be able to see kirk under the tent, with where kirk was sitting.

 

[charlottebronte666]

this special forces sniper disagrees. He actually did a video with zeb yesterday.

- YouTube

Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.

www.youtube.com

He spends three hours agreeing with Zeb. What are you talking about.

 

[westwall]

if it hit him from behind the exit wound would have been larger than the wound that was sustained in the front .. and your comment about a 30 06 being used for grizzlies .. I wouldn't trust that round unless it was a head shot .. learn a little about ballistics before you post ..

Also it depends on the type of round used. 130 grain, loaded down, is not going to have the same power as a 150 grain Nosler Partition at top velocity.

 

[Dr Grump]

If it hit him from behind than the front wound IS the exit would, retard.

Er, I think that is his point.

 

[charlottebronte666]

 

[ThisIsMe]

He spends three hours agreeing with Zeb. What are you talking about.

No, they disagreed about plenty, but they just dont argue about it

 

[Mac-7]

The FBI is lying about who shot Charlie.

I guess the man they arrested is lying also, because has admitted to shooting Kirk

So who do you think is responsible for killing Charlie?

 

[Scoutster]

30 ought 6 is a very effective round. For game bigger than deer. I usually go with my 300 win mag sometimes larger. But 30 ought 6 will effectively take down a bear with the right set up and capable shooter. I love my 338 and my 375 H&H I don’t shoot them a lot anymore though I quit firing my 50 Cal well over a decade ago.

 

[theHawk]

A 30-06 bullet that the FBI says hit Charlie would blow through not only an elk but the elk standing behind it. It is a high-powered weapon of the kind you need to take down a grizzly bear, which can have a skull the thickess of armor plate. What hit Charlie hit him from behind, not the front like the FBI says, and it was most definitely not a 30-06. You don't have to know much about hunting to know that. It was a smaller round that would punch right through, says Marine sniper and ballistics instructor Zeb Boykin, who did one of the first analyses. Boykin found the frame where you can actually see the bullet coming in from Charlies right, behind him, not from the front. The blood that was pouring out the front of his neck is from an exit wound. The FBI is lying about who shot Charlie.

Marine sniper Zeb Boykin

Surgeon calls Charlie Kirk ‘man of steel’ — reveals ‘miracle’ factor that likely prevented more from being hurt

“Even in death, Charlie managed to save the lives of those around him. Remarkable. Miraculous,” said a Turning Point USA spokesman.

nypost.com

"“I just spoke with the surgeon who worked on Charlie in the hospital … He said the bullet ‘absolutely should have gone through, which is very very normal for a high-powered, high-velocity round,’ ” Kolvet said. ” ‘I’ve seen wounds from this caliber many times and they always just go through everything. This would have taken a moose or two down, an elk, etc.’...” ‘It was an absolute miracle that someone else didn’t get killed,’ ” Kolvet said the doctor told him. ” ‘His bone was so healthy and the density was so so impressive that he’s like the man of steel. "

Dumb. Bullets do all kinds of crazy shit. Just because there was no large exit wound doesn’t mean there is some grand conspiracy.

The ****** tranny shot him, end of story.

 

[PeterPilot]

I guess the man they arrested is lying also, because has admitted to shooting Kirk

So who do you think is responsible for killing Charlie?

Play actors are real, and they say and do whatever they are paid to say and do.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

A 30-06 bullet that the FBI says hit Charlie would blow through not only an elk but the elk standing behind it. It is a high-powered weapon of the kind you need to take down a grizzly bear, which can have a skull the thickess of armor plate. What hit Charlie hit him from behind, not the front like the FBI says, and it was most definitely not a 30-06. You don't have to know much about hunting to know that. It was a smaller round that would punch right through, says Marine sniper and ballistics instructor Zeb Boykin, who did one of the first analyses. Boykin found the frame where you can actually see the bullet coming in from Charlies right, behind him, not from the front. The blood that was pouring out the front of his neck is from an exit wound. The FBI is lying about who shot Charlie.

Marine sniper Zeb Boykin

Surgeon calls Charlie Kirk ‘man of steel’ — reveals ‘miracle’ factor that likely prevented more from being hurt

“Even in death, Charlie managed to save the lives of those around him. Remarkable. Miraculous,” said a Turning Point USA spokesman.

nypost.com

"“I just spoke with the surgeon who worked on Charlie in the hospital … He said the bullet ‘absolutely should have gone through, which is very very normal for a high-powered, high-velocity round,’ ” Kolvet said. ” ‘I’ve seen wounds from this caliber many times and they always just go through everything. This would have taken a moose or two down, an elk, etc.’...” ‘It was an absolute miracle that someone else didn’t get killed,’ ” Kolvet said the doctor told him. ” ‘His bone was so healthy and the density was so so impressive that he’s like the man of steel. "

 

[Mac-7]

Play actors are real, and they say and do whatever they are paid to say and do.

Ok, if you say so

This guy is going to the gallows (or firing squad)

So I hope the DNC paid him well

 

[RetiredGySgt]

If it hit him from behind than the front wound IS the exit would, retard. And you know less than nothing about ballistics if you think what hit was was a 30-06. His head would have exploded.

I am sorry but the exit wound is ALWAYS bigger than the entry wound for any caliber fired.

 

[PeterPilot]

Ok, if you say so

This guy is going to the gallows (or firing squad)

So I hope the DNC paid him well

Simple minds have simple thoughts. The DNC did not do this, the Zionist entity that controls the federal (and a few states) government did this.

 

[Godboy]

And you know less than nothing about ballistics if you think what hit was was a 30-06. His head would have exploded.

 

[yidnar]

If it hit him from behind than the front wound IS the exit would, retard. And you know less than nothing about ballistics if you think what hit was was a 30-06. His head would have exploded.

if it hit him from behind the exit wound in the front of his neck would have been much larger .. once again learn about ballistics and firearms before you post ..