How Are B And O That Different?

kaz

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2010
Messages
78,025
Reaction score
22,332
Points
2,190
Location
Kazmania
Spending and government growth? W added a prescription drug welfare "benefit" to Medicare, created the TSA, signed a $250 billion Christmas tree of government spending called a "Transpiration" bill, signed a bill which restricted political speech going into elections, created the no child gets ahead bill with Ted Kennedy, never vetoed a spending bill and proposed government budget increases every year that increase spending in every real way (inflation, economic growth, etc.).

Military? Obama continued W's timeline in Iraq, expanded Afghanistan, attacked Libya and saber rattled in Syria and Egypt among others. As for W, he held back the military because of criticism. Both used the military extensively, yet aren't really committed to winning, just perpetual war.

Morality? What difference is there at all? Neither has done anything to reduce Federal ownership of our bodies, neither has addressed the war we are losing the worst now, the war on drugs.

Energy? Financial services? Sure, Obama is more malignant in demogging those industries, but what favors did the "MBA" President ever do them?

Both signed TARP.

What's the difference? Either way? Sure, what they say is different. But how was for his speeches Bush any friend of economic liberty, and how is Obama any different in what he actually does?
 
I blame nuclear weapons. Somehow since we got them, we refuse to use them...but knowing we have them we feel compelled to fight at the bow and arrow level of our enemy...lest we be called bullies by the world community. **** the world community. **** perpetual war. If you're stupid enough to **** with us....you're fucked.
 
I blame nuclear weapons. Somehow since we got them, we refuse to use them...but knowing we have them we feel compelled to fight at the bow and arrow level of our enemy...lest we be called bullies by the world community. **** the world community. **** perpetual war. If you're stupid enough to **** with us....you're fucked.

While I oppose the idea of limited war, I'm not sure how nuclear weapons would help us.

I do not think we should be in the Middle East, but if we are, we should be there to win it. And neither President was.
 
I blame nuclear weapons. Somehow since we got them, we refuse to use them...but knowing we have them we feel compelled to fight at the bow and arrow level of our enemy...lest we be called bullies by the world community. **** the world community. **** perpetual war. If you're stupid enough to **** with us....you're fucked.

While I oppose the idea of limited war, I'm not sure how nuclear weapons would help us.

I do not think we should be in the Middle East, but if we are, we should be there to win it. And neither President was.
Come on Kaz. Nukes would win the war in a day. It's either back out and surrender to evil, of kill it.
 
I blame nuclear weapons. Somehow since we got them, we refuse to use them...but knowing we have them we feel compelled to fight at the bow and arrow level of our enemy...lest we be called bullies by the world community. **** the world community. **** perpetual war. If you're stupid enough to **** with us....you're fucked.

While I oppose the idea of limited war, I'm not sure how nuclear weapons would help us.

I do not think we should be in the Middle East, but if we are, we should be there to win it. And neither President was.
Come on Kaz. Nukes would win the war in a day. It's either back out and surrender to evil, of kill it.

I realize the literalness of that if we kill everyone that would end the wars, but I don't understand the usefulness of the observation.
 
I blame nuclear weapons. Somehow since we got them, we refuse to use them...but knowing we have them we feel compelled to fight at the bow and arrow level of our enemy...lest we be called bullies by the world community. **** the world community. **** perpetual war. If you're stupid enough to **** with us....you're fucked.

While I oppose the idea of limited war, I'm not sure how nuclear weapons would help us.

I do not think we should be in the Middle East, but if we are, we should be there to win it. And neither President was.
Come on Kaz. Nukes would win the war in a day. It's either back out and surrender to evil, of kill it.

I realize the literalness of that if we kill everyone that would end the wars, but I don't understand the usefulness of the observation.
Oh
 
Back
Top Bottom