Grand Jury Testimony From Senator David Perdue Suggests Gov. Brian Kemp Halted Investigation Into 2020 Election

[Doc7505]

Grand Jury Testimony From Senator David Perdue Suggests ​

Gov. Brian Kemp Halted Investigation Into 2020 Election​

Grand Jury Testimony From Senator David Perdue Suggests Gov. Brian Kemp Halted Investigation Into 2020 Election

"If the governor doesn’t want to investigate, we’re not going to investigate."

badlands.substack.com

5 Feb 2026 ~~ By Brian Lupo

On August 24th, 2023, Donald Trump surrendered himself to authorities at the Fulton County Jail. What followed was the most infamous mugshot of all time. He had just been indicted on racketeering and other charges related to the 2020 presidential election results in Georgia.
The case of State of Georgia v. Trump, et al. - which was manufactured by Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis and her lover Nathan Wade - was ultimately dismissed on November 25th, 2025. Even after its dismissal, the case is providing us with more context of what actually happened (and what didn’t happen) surrounding the 2020 election.
Last month, Judge Scott McAfee lifted a protective order on the special grand jury transcripts from the case of State of Georgia v. Trump, et al.
One particular transcript contains a concerning claim made by former U.S. Senator David Perdue.
On September 6, 2022, Sen. Perdue sat for a transcribed interview in front of the Grand Jury. He was examined by Nathan Wade, among others.
~Snip~
The Backstory
The evidence that was presented to Reynolds and also viewed by Senator Perdue stems from a presentation made by True the Vote in May 2021.
According to a follow-up letter by Reynolds, the data presented identified “279 cellphones which had made multiple trips to within 100 feet of a voter drop box.” Other documents provided tied those specific cell phones to various organizations through geolocation.
~Snip~
An Interesting History of Failing Up
Reynolds isn’t the first Georgia official to be involved in 2020 election investigations and later receive an appointment to a judgeship.
Nor is he the second.
He is the third.
Following the 2020 election, around November 17, 2020, Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger claimed that an audit of five counties was performed by Pro V&V, a voting systems testing lab.
Pro V&V is not a certified auditing firm, and their involvement in any post-election audit would be a direct conflict of interest, since they were responsible for certifying the equipment prior to the election.
Raffensperger claimed that Cobb, Douglas, Floyd, Morgan, Paulding, and Spalding counties were the subject of the Pro V&V audits.
~Snip~
IG McAfee said he could only go after one allegation: the claims that an audit never took place. Coovert claims that when he gave McAfee the evidence that the audits didn’t take place in the six counties mentioned, McAfee stopped talking to Coovert.
He claims he also went to Alison Sosebee, then a district attorney in the Appalachian Circuit, and shared the information with her. She also stopped talking to him following the presentation of evidence.
Both McAfee and Sosebee are now Superior Court judges appointed by Governor Kemp.

​

Commentary:
The rot in the Democrat Party is wide and deep.
Seems the Georgia RINOs willing joined in to keep their corrupt gravy train rolling.
Wonder when the investigation of the massive fraud and corruption in public SNAP and Medicare will reach GA?

​

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch...29a-0c9a-4a42-8f9c-3832bbc79415_1161x1052.png

 

[OldFlame]

It disgusts me to read stuff like this knowing that nothing will ever happen to bring any of these people to justice. Until that happens this country will just continue to rot.

 

[Manonthestreet]

 

[wamose]

I don't know what's worse, neocons or Democrats. Unfortunately, they both seem to be above the law.

 

[Doc7505]

It disgusts me to read stuff like this knowing that nothing will ever happen to bring any of these people to justice. Until that happens this country will just continue to rot.

<~~~~~~~~~~>​

Ya never can tell, can ya.....

 

[Oddball]

Grand Jury Testimony From Senator David Perdue Suggests ​

Gov. Brian Kemp Halted Investigation Into 2020 Election​

Grand Jury Testimony From Senator David Perdue Suggests Gov. Brian Kemp Halted Investigation Into 2020 Election

"If the governor doesn’t want to investigate, we’re not going to investigate."

badlands.substack.com

5 Feb 2026 ~~ By Brian Lupo

On August 24th, 2023, Donald Trump surrendered himself to authorities at the Fulton County Jail. What followed was the most infamous mugshot of all time. He had just been indicted on racketeering and other charges related to the 2020 presidential election results in Georgia.
The case of State of Georgia v. Trump, et al. - which was manufactured by Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis and her lover Nathan Wade - was ultimately dismissed on November 25th, 2025. Even after its dismissal, the case is providing us with more context of what actually happened (and what didn’t happen) surrounding the 2020 election.
Last month, Judge Scott McAfee lifted a protective order on the special grand jury transcripts from the case of State of Georgia v. Trump, et al.
One particular transcript contains a concerning claim made by former U.S. Senator David Perdue.
On September 6, 2022, Sen. Perdue sat for a transcribed interview in front of the Grand Jury. He was examined by Nathan Wade, among others.
~Snip~
The Backstory
The evidence that was presented to Reynolds and also viewed by Senator Perdue stems from a presentation made by True the Vote in May 2021.
According to a follow-up letter by Reynolds, the data presented identified “279 cellphones which had made multiple trips to within 100 feet of a voter drop box.” Other documents provided tied those specific cell phones to various organizations through geolocation.
~Snip~
An Interesting History of Failing Up
Reynolds isn’t the first Georgia official to be involved in 2020 election investigations and later receive an appointment to a judgeship.
Nor is he the second.
He is the third.
Following the 2020 election, around November 17, 2020, Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger claimed that an audit of five counties was performed by Pro V&V, a voting systems testing lab.
Pro V&V is not a certified auditing firm, and their involvement in any post-election audit would be a direct conflict of interest, since they were responsible for certifying the equipment prior to the election.
Raffensperger claimed that Cobb, Douglas, Floyd, Morgan, Paulding, and Spalding counties were the subject of the Pro V&V audits.
~Snip~
IG McAfee said he could only go after one allegation: the claims that an audit never took place. Coovert claims that when he gave McAfee the evidence that the audits didn’t take place in the six counties mentioned, McAfee stopped talking to Coovert.
He claims he also went to Alison Sosebee, then a district attorney in the Appalachian Circuit, and shared the information with her. She also stopped talking to him following the presentation of evidence.
Both McAfee and Sosebee are now Superior Court judges appointed by Governor Kemp.

​

Commentary:
The rot in the Democrat Party is wide and deep.
Seems the Georgia RINOs willing joined in to keep their corrupt gravy train rolling.
Wonder when the investigation of the massive fraud and corruption in public SNAP and Medicare will reach GA?

​

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!PEnX!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https://substack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com/public/images/5e42229a-0c9a-4a42-8f9c-3832bbc79415_1161x1052.png

Of course it stopped...Kemp got "an offer he couldn't refuse", when his daughter's boyfriend got killed by his car getting bombed.

 

[Doc7505]

Report: Fulton County, GA -- Home of Fanny Willis and Darrius "Sweetdick" Honeycum, Esq. -- Had 25,000 MoreAbsentee​

Ace of Spades HQ

ace.mu.nu

Whoops!
Whoopsie!
(Excerpt)
As you know, 99% of the lawsuits filed to contest the rigged 2020 election were tossed out due to the judges deciding that the candidates in the races did not have "standing" -- a recognizable legal interest -- to challenge the rules which determine the outcome of the races.
This was absurd then and it's absurd now. (And it was also very dishonest for the partisan Democrat media to bleat that judges had examined all of these allegations and found them meritless. No -- it dismissed the lawsuits without ever examining the allegations.)
Three weeks ago, the Supreme Court injected some sanity back into election contests, determining that, yes, the actual candidates in elections do have legal standing to challenge election rules.
Like whether or not you verify signatures or not.

In a surprisingly sweeping opinion issued Wednesday, a five-justice majority in Bost v. Illinois State Board of Elections held that a federal congressional candidate had a legal right to sue, known as standing, in federal court to challenge an Illinois law that allows mail-in ballots postmarked by Election Day to be counted as many as 14 days later. Reversing lower federal court rulings that denied Rep. Michael Bost (R-Ill.) standing to sue, the majority opinion by Chief Justice John Roberts adopted a categorical rule upholding candidate standing based on a candidate's inherent interest in "the integrity of the election" and the "democratic process."​

The vote was 7-2 in favor of Bost, with Justice Amy Coney Barrett, joined by Justice Elena Kagan, agreeing with the result that the majority reached but not its reasoning. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, joined in dissent by Justice Sonia Sotomayor, would have affirmed the lower courts' denial of standing.​

Under the "case or controversy" clause of Article III of the Constitution, plaintiffs in federal court only have standing to sue if they properly allege that the challenged action or law causes them "concrete and particularized injury in fact." The Supreme Court has generally interpreted that rule to deny standing based merely on some category that the plaintiff falls into, such as "citizen standing" or "taxpayer standing." Instead, the court has usually required plaintiffs to allege that that they have suffered some kind of judicially cognizable real-world harm that sets them apart from the broad run of society.​

Adopting the principal argument advanced by Bost, the majority stated, "Candidates have a concrete and particularized interest in the rules that govern the counting of votes in their elections, regardless whether those rules harm their electoral prospects or increase the cost of their campaigns." That candidate interest in protecting the integrity and fairness of the electoral process "is in no sense 'common to all members of the public,'" Roberts asserted. Although the public also has an interest in the integrity of elections, the candidate's interest "differs in kind." An unfair election "plainly affects those who compete for the support of the people in a different way than it affects the people who lend their support," Roberts stated.​

Commentary:
Hmm....., 81 million votes in 2020 and Georgia was key in the Republican loss of 2020...
"Standing" is 99% bullshit, its usually just a device judges use to avoid hearing a case they won't like the outcome of or information raised in the hearing.
It's pretty clear the Republicans in Georgia already knew this but worked to screw Trump over anyway.
What's the chances that someone will be held accountable now?
Can the four year term of the Democrat Biden administration be completely nullified if proven that the 2020 presidential election was fraudulent? Can Trump be given the next 4 year term if Fraud was conducted by Democrats?
Now that is a Constitutional argument that none of can answer and surely a case for SCOTUS.
Will the lead Headlines soon be:
Trump gets a bonus term, and all Democrat officials go in a camp.

 

[toobfreak]

The rot in the Democrat Party is wide and deep.

Which is to say the whole democrat party is rot.

Seems the Georgia RINOs willing joined in to keep their corrupt gravy train rolling.

Of course. This is what RINOS do. Which is why I don't trust people moving from blue states to red states wanting to make red states redder, RINOS join the GOP just like blue state voters move to red states for: to make the GOP and the red states more like the shithole they left.

If the GOP had a set of stones at all, they would hold all members of the GOP in DC to certain minimum standards just as they should hold all people moving from blue states to red states to have to register as republicans to move there for at least the first ten years.