Galactical model of subquark particles

Wise47

Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2019
Messages
74
Reaction score
15
Points
21
Location
Poland
below text comes from my bigger work New horizons in physics

Electrons, quarks and gluons possess internal structure, consist of quadrillion of particles of size about 10^-35 m [they correspond with photons], these then from quadrillion of particles about 10^-50 m [they correspond with gravitons]. To confirm legitimacy of assuming of hypothesis of internal structure of smallest from hitherto known structural subatomic particles as electrons, quarks and gluons it can be invoked the theory of science created by A.Comte (see after text Comte's Theory of Science).


a9yXYM3E_o.gif


diagram 1. Galatical model

Every following field uses in a large extent from previous, sociology from biology - theory of evolution, biology from chemistry - an example biochemistry, chemistry from physics - even if structure of atom and periodic table, physics from astronomy. Invoking astronomy it can be in physics reach eg. conception of existence of atoms and their internal structure - stars, planets, planetary system. It can be also reach models applied in conception of subquark particles and QG. It is galactical, and cosmical model. Mystery of dark matter can be explained in this way that preonical particles possess mass (the above part of this paragraph is from year 2014).
A more careful analysis of the galactical model leads to the conclusion that there are more types of particles of the right type. Types of stars, by supergiants, giants, dwarfs, all the way to the supermassive black hole at the center of the galaxy would correspond to the types of these particles. Cosmical model analysis leads to similar conclusions, where the types of particles would correspond to the appropriate types of galaxies.
In addition, it can be assumed that there are types of photon-like particles and corresponding waves with significantly higher speeds than the speed of light. So there are non-electromagnetic waves far above the speed of light (the above part of this paragraph is from year 2019).
Particles much faster than photons are related to the cosmical model and sizes in the order of 10^-50 m. One can imagine building devices equipped with antennas for superelectromagnetic communication. The speed of such communication would be enormous, for example, communication with a base on Pluto could take less than a second.
Main particle from the galactical model will correspond to a supermassive black hole at the center of the galaxy. Perhaps quarks are made of such particles. One can also consider the hypothesis that these particles are micro black holes that have ended their lives as particles, by evaporating. These evaporating micro black holes can produce all the particles from the galactical model (compare stars in the galaxy). The only issue is that these particles can also be building blocks of, for example, quarks.
The bonds of particles from the galactic model and higher models are probably - like quark-gluon bonds - indecomposable. All particles from the galactical model are somehow related to the main particle of the model, which is related to the rotation of the galaxy where the center is a supermassive black hole (black star). There are three types of galaxies, spiral, elliptical and irregular, just as there are three kinds of particles, electrons, quarks and gluons. The largest particles in the galactic model would correspond to hypergiant stars (the above part of this paragraph is from year 2023).

Gregory Podgorniak, Poland
 
below text comes from my bigger work New horizons in physics

Electrons, quarks and gluons possess internal structure, consist of quadrillion of particles of size about 10^-35 m [they correspond with photons], these then from quadrillion of particles about 10^-50 m [they correspond with gravitons]. To confirm legitimacy of assuming of hypothesis of internal structure of smallest from hitherto known structural subatomic particles as electrons, quarks and gluons it can be invoked the theory of science created by A.Comte (see after text Comte's Theory of Science).


a9yXYM3E_o.gif


diagram 1. Galatical model

Every following field uses in a large extent from previous, sociology from biology - theory of evolution, biology from chemistry - an example biochemistry, chemistry from physics - even if structure of atom and periodic table, physics from astronomy. Invoking astronomy it can be in physics reach eg. conception of existence of atoms and their internal structure - stars, planets, planetary system. It can be also reach models applied in conception of subquark particles and QG. It is galactical, and cosmical model. Mystery of dark matter can be explained in this way that preonical particles possess mass (the above part of this paragraph is from year 2014).
A more careful analysis of the galactical model leads to the conclusion that there are more types of particles of the right type. Types of stars, by supergiants, giants, dwarfs, all the way to the supermassive black hole at the center of the galaxy would correspond to the types of these particles. Cosmical model analysis leads to similar conclusions, where the types of particles would correspond to the appropriate types of galaxies.
In addition, it can be assumed that there are types of photon-like particles and corresponding waves with significantly higher speeds than the speed of light. So there are non-electromagnetic waves far above the speed of light (the above part of this paragraph is from year 2019).
Particles much faster than photons are related to the cosmical model and sizes in the order of 10^-50 m. One can imagine building devices equipped with antennas for superelectromagnetic communication. The speed of such communication would be enormous, for example, communication with a base on Pluto could take less than a second.
Main particle from the galactical model will correspond to a supermassive black hole at the center of the galaxy. Perhaps quarks are made of such particles. One can also consider the hypothesis that these particles are micro black holes that have ended their lives as particles, by evaporating. These evaporating micro black holes can produce all the particles from the galactical model (compare stars in the galaxy). The only issue is that these particles can also be building blocks of, for example, quarks.
The bonds of particles from the galactic model and higher models are probably - like quark-gluon bonds - indecomposable. All particles from the galactical model are somehow related to the main particle of the model, which is related to the rotation of the galaxy where the center is a supermassive black hole (black star). There are three types of galaxies, spiral, elliptical and irregular, just as there are three kinds of particles, electrons, quarks and gluons. The largest particles in the galactic model would correspond to hypergiant stars (the above part of this paragraph is from year 2023).

Gregory Podgorniak, Poland

My takeaway is that this reality is a Creation, randomness need not apply
 
I agree, the universe came into being in an act of divine creation and is a fairly well-ordered design.
If it was designed, it wasnt designed for humans. Humans will NEVER get to the edge of the universe, no matter how long our race survives, not even if our race becomes eternal. Hell, we wont even be able to see much of the universe through a telescope, let alone go there. The universe was definitely not designed for us.
 
If it was designed, it wasnt designed for humans. Humans will NEVER get to the edge of the universe, no matter how long our race survives, not even if our race becomes eternal. Hell, we wont even be able to see much of the universe through a telescope, let alone go there. The universe was definitely not designed for us.
God neglects us
 
If it was designed, it wasnt designed for humans. Humans will NEVER get to the edge of the universe, no matter how long our race survives, not even if our race becomes eternal. Hell, we wont even be able to see much of the universe through a telescope, let alone go there. The universe was definitely not designed for us.
We can probably talk about a project here - it was conceived as a place for the creation of all living and later intelligent forms, in which the model of human-like forms probably prevails. So if these cosmic forms, then people too.
 
We can probably talk about a project here - it was conceived as a place for the creation of all living and later intelligent forms, in which the model of human-like forms probably prevails. So if these cosmic forms, then people too.
I appreciate that theory, but I dont think that is true either. Lets assume for a moment that there is an all powerful god or some other greater being who made it all, and he made it with the purpose to make intelligent beings prevail, then why did we have to spend billions of years as microbes? Why not just instantly start as fully developed humans?

Why is the universe still growing? Why didnt it just appear fully formed as it was meant to be? A universe that is expanding faster than the speed of light is not useful for humans at all. Its size isnt useful either.

As you look out at the stars, as we all know, that is light from billions of years ago. Most of those stars dont even exist anymore. We are just seeing old light that traveled for eons to get here. Anything that we discover outside of our solar system with telescopes is long gone (with the exception of some nearby solar systems). How is that useful to us?
 
Last edited:
We can probably talk about a project here - it was conceived as a place for the creation of all living and later intelligent forms, in which the model of human-like forms probably prevails. So if these cosmic forms, then people too.
We Are What We Think

There is no life without intelligence. Even the most primitive forms have to choose how they can survive or evolve.

There was a contradiction in Terminator I, when the robot was given a choice on what phrase to use when he talked back to a cop.
 
I appreciate that theory, but I dont think that is true either. Lets assume for a moment that there is an all powerful god or some other greater being who made it all, and he made it with the purpose to make intelligent beings prevail, then why did we have to spend billions of years as microbes? Why not just instantly start as fully developed humans?

Why is the universe still growing? Why didnt it just appear fully formed as it was meant to be? A universe that is expanding faster than the speed of light is not useful for humans at all. Its size isnt useful either.
God exists but is not a being with unlimited abilities, only a certain being, let's call it spiritual. Hence his power is not so great as to create a ready-made universe. Here we can talk about combining naturalism with religion. Hence the necessity of evolution from physical matter, through chemical to biological. The design of the universe is quite successful but it is not perfect and could not be ready right away for objective reasons.
 
Push the "Grit" theory as far as you can, but it is Consciousness that becomes Plasma under certain conditions while Grit always remains Grit , however small the particles .

That's why they sold us Einstein .
Trapped the Sheeple in a dead -end .

Be interesting to see the re-written scripts once ZPE is disclosed in any detail .
 
God exists but is not a being with unlimited abilities, only a certain being, let's call it spiritual. Hence his power is not so great as to create a ready-made universe. Here we can talk about combining naturalism with religion. Hence the necessity of evolution from physical matter, through chemical to biological. The design of the universe is quite successful but it is not perfect and could not be ready right away for objective reasons.
Your hypothesis makes more sense than what is typically taught about religion, but i dont think you can present any evidence to support it. It seems like youre just guessing at this point, but i greatly appreciate the idea of God being imperfect. I dont see perfection anywhere.
 
God exists but is not a being with unlimited abilities, only a certain being, let's call it spiritual. Hence his power is not so great as to create a ready-made universe. Here we can talk about combining naturalism with religion. Hence the necessity of evolution from physical matter, through chemical to biological. The design of the universe is quite successful but it is not perfect and could not be ready right away for objective reasons.
It's a shame He doesn't end the arguments and just show himself
 
We have here practically two models, one galactical and the second cosmical.
 
Back
Top Bottom