End the Asylum Regime

[excalibur]

Now.

Because, as the left-wingers realize, it is a suicide pact and they're all in on destroying America and the West.

...

It is long past time to withdraw from the U.N. refugee treaty and prohibit illegal aliens, as a matter of policy, from applying for asylum. In short, asylum delenda est. Any attempts to tighten the current judicialized asylum system will always be vulnerable to lawyers and judges intent on debating how many refugees can dance on the head of a pin, resulting in the kind of huge backlogs we see in our asylum system today, which allow “asylum-seekers” years to live and work (and have children) here. Even a restriction such as the current requirement in U.S. law that asylum applicants be detained during the entire course of their proceedings is vulnerable to an administration, like the current one, that simply disregards it and releases illegal aliens by the millions.

But deleting asylum from the U.S. Code will still leave some illegal aliens from countries to which we don’t want to repatriate them or that simply refuse to take their citizens back. That’s why something like the “remain in Rwanda” approach (or maybe “remain in Paraguay” or “remain in Mongolia”) will always be needed. With enough carrots and sticks, we would always be able to find countries that agree to take illegal aliens claiming to be fleeing persecution — a number that would be much smaller than the ones we’re now seeing on our southern border and on Europe’s borders, because a bogus asylum claim would no longer be an entry ticket to the developed world.​

End the Asylum Regime | National Review

It is long past time for the U.S. to withdraw from the U.N. refugee treaty and prohibit illegal aliens, as a matter of policy, from applying for asylum.

www.nationalreview.com

 

[Godboy]

Now.

Because, as the left-wingers realize, it is a suicide pact and they're all in on destroying America and the West.

...​

​

It is long past time to withdraw from the U.N. refugee treaty and prohibit illegal aliens, as a matter of policy, from applying for asylum. In short, asylum delenda est. Any attempts to tighten the current judicialized asylum system will always be vulnerable to lawyers and judges intent on debating how many refugees can dance on the head of a pin, resulting in the kind of huge backlogs we see in our asylum system today, which allow “asylum-seekers” years to live and work (and have children) here. Even a restriction such as the current requirement in U.S. law that asylum applicants be detained during the entire course of their proceedings is vulnerable to an administration, like the current one, that simply disregards it and releases illegal aliens by the millions.​

​

But deleting asylum from the U.S. Code will still leave some illegal aliens from countries to which we don’t want to repatriate them or that simply refuse to take their citizens back. That’s why something like the “remain in Rwanda” approach (or maybe “remain in Paraguay” or “remain in Mongolia”) will always be needed. With enough carrots and sticks, we would always be able to find countries that agree to take illegal aliens claiming to be fleeing persecution — a number that would be much smaller than the ones we’re now seeing on our southern border and on Europe’s borders, because a bogus asylum claim would no longer be an entry ticket to the developed world.​

End the Asylum Regime | National Review

It is long past time for the U.S. to withdraw from the U.N. refugee treaty and prohibit illegal aliens, as a matter of policy, from applying for asylum.

www.nationalreview.com

Build them a big raft, then let the currents take them to their new home. They dont have to go to Rwanda; let the sea decide where they end up.

 

[White 6]

Now.

Because, as the left-wingers realize, it is a suicide pact and they're all in on destroying America and the West.

...​

​

It is long past time to withdraw from the U.N. refugee treaty and prohibit illegal aliens, as a matter of policy, from applying for asylum. In short, asylum delenda est. Any attempts to tighten the current judicialized asylum system will always be vulnerable to lawyers and judges intent on debating how many refugees can dance on the head of a pin, resulting in the kind of huge backlogs we see in our asylum system today, which allow “asylum-seekers” years to live and work (and have children) here. Even a restriction such as the current requirement in U.S. law that asylum applicants be detained during the entire course of their proceedings is vulnerable to an administration, like the current one, that simply disregards it and releases illegal aliens by the millions.​

​

But deleting asylum from the U.S. Code will still leave some illegal aliens from countries to which we don’t want to repatriate them or that simply refuse to take their citizens back. That’s why something like the “remain in Rwanda” approach (or maybe “remain in Paraguay” or “remain in Mongolia”) will always be needed. With enough carrots and sticks, we would always be able to find countries that agree to take illegal aliens claiming to be fleeing persecution — a number that would be much smaller than the ones we’re now seeing on our southern border and on Europe’s borders, because a bogus asylum claim would no longer be an entry ticket to the developed world.​

End the Asylum Regime | National Review

It is long past time for the U.S. to withdraw from the U.N. refugee treaty and prohibit illegal aliens, as a matter of policy, from applying for asylum.

www.nationalreview.com

I could go for withdrawal from the UN treaty on asylum. The way it is working now, we take all into the country, no matter how they get into the country and sort them out later, as to if they really qualify for asylum, only they never get sorted out. Just because looking for a better life, doesn't mean they deserve it here, and doesn't mean we should finance them. If their case can't be adjudicated at the border, they should be rejected at the border. That doesn't mean, I think none deserve asylum. Some do, but it should be managed intelligently. I do not see this happening under the way the UN treaty is either worded or interpreted, and never has been.

 

[Moonglow]

Now.

Because, as the left-wingers realize, it is a suicide pact and they're all in on destroying America and the West.

...​

​

It is long past time to withdraw from the U.N. refugee treaty and prohibit illegal aliens, as a matter of policy, from applying for asylum. In short, asylum delenda est. Any attempts to tighten the current judicialized asylum system will always be vulnerable to lawyers and judges intent on debating how many refugees can dance on the head of a pin, resulting in the kind of huge backlogs we see in our asylum system today, which allow “asylum-seekers” years to live and work (and have children) here. Even a restriction such as the current requirement in U.S. law that asylum applicants be detained during the entire course of their proceedings is vulnerable to an administration, like the current one, that simply disregards it and releases illegal aliens by the millions.​

​

But deleting asylum from the U.S. Code will still leave some illegal aliens from countries to which we don’t want to repatriate them or that simply refuse to take their citizens back. That’s why something like the “remain in Rwanda” approach (or maybe “remain in Paraguay” or “remain in Mongolia”) will always be needed. With enough carrots and sticks, we would always be able to find countries that agree to take illegal aliens claiming to be fleeing persecution — a number that would be much smaller than the ones we’re now seeing on our southern border and on Europe’s borders, because a bogus asylum claim would no longer be an entry ticket to the developed world.​

End the Asylum Regime | National Review

It is long past time for the U.S. to withdraw from the U.N. refugee treaty and prohibit illegal aliens, as a matter of policy, from applying for asylum.

www.nationalreview.com

Immigration laws passed by both parties in the 1970s through the 1990s are the culprit but you may blame only one side because you are not fair.