Donald Trump makes a veiled threat towards Michelle Obama stating that if he’s elected, “I think we're gonna start having a little fun with Michelle.”



What does he mean? It's clearly a threat. What do you think?


Meaning he will call out the fact that he won. You keep reaching and Trump gets the coverage he always desires.

The Dems seemed to have this understood until they supported the J6 Committee. That committee single handedly gave Trump life again when De Santis was rising, it also cost one of the loyal warhawks her political career.
 
It means what we all privately admit , that Michelle is Michael Robinson and that Obummer is a raging pansy but chose to lie all his life and pretend otherwise .

A straightforward statement with no threat -- direct , indirect or implied .
 


What does he mean? It's clearly a threat. What do you think?


You ask “what does it mean” and you also state “it’s clearly a threat”, so, either you know, or you don’t know.

Here’s what I think. It makes no difference what Trump meant, you’re going to assign your own belief to it, so, even if someone explains it to you, you won’t believe it
 
You ask “what does it mean” and you also state “it’s clearly a threat”, so, either you know, or you don’t know.

Here’s what I think. It makes no difference what Trump meant, you’re going to assign your own belief to it, so, even if someone explains it to you, you won’t believe it

We still have ZERO evidence Trump even said this. Lakhota just posted a tweet from some random internet kook.
 
Meaning he will call out the fact that he won. You keep reaching and Trump gets the coverage he always desires.

The Dems seemed to have this understood until they supported the J6 Committee. That committee single handedly gave Trump life again when De Santis was rising, it also cost one of the loyal warhawks her political career.
No, trump will try doing everything in his power to upend the Obamas. You seem to have the mistaken belief that any attempt to hold trump accountable makes him stronger. The J6 investigation was legit and trumps role in it was properly investigated. There is no reaching here. Ask Alexander Vindman who was immediately fired after testifying against Trump. Ask Andrew McCabe who was fired by trump one day before he was eligible for his retirement benefits for investgating trump. You read that right wing pro trump propaganda and think it's fact. Trump would be wise to leave Michelle Obama alone if he is elected.
 
No, trump will try doing everything in his power to upend the Obamas. You seem to have the mistaken belief that any attempt to hold trump accountable makes him stronger. The J6 investigation was legit and trumps role in it was properly investigated. There is no reaching here. Ask Alexander Vindman who was immediately fired after testifying against Trump. Ask Andrew McCabe who was fired by trump one day before he was eligible for his retirement benefits for investgating trump. You read that right wing pro trump propaganda and think it's fact. Trump would be wise to leave Michelle Obama alone if he is elected.

You're using Vindman as an example of character?

I don't know if it's on youtube or not but I will never forget the look on Vindmans face as he was on CNN when Russia first invaded Ukraine. Now, why would he be such an important person to interview at this moment? Good question, kind of weird I thought but regardless.

You could see in his face that moment of clarity "I did all I could to take down Trump, the man who actually sent weapons to Ukraine, not pillows, and here we are facing the death of many in Ukraine as Russia decided "I better attack now before a GOP gets back in office". Vindman didn't seem very confident in that moment like many in the world, all credit goes to Ukraine for their courage and yes, America in particularly for arming them in short order.

Now, look at this map below it is from a Switzerland website so not propaganda. Two years after the war began after Trump left office and hundreds of billions sent from the U.S and Europe to Ukraine. The pink represents the territory that Russia occupies. That is about 15-20%. Far less than the world thought would be taken after this long, but, with BRICS and the coordination of Axis funding proxies in the M.E and elsewhere, we are ever close to WWIII.

Now with N Korean soldiers as he is looking to overwhelm Ukrainian in numbers with most of these new soldiers playing defense while Russians advance, it's more clear than ever and first advised by the former general of Ukraine that they need more soldiers. As I said, there are also rumours that China may send soldiers covertly over into this fight.

The risk of WWIII suddenly increases substantially.

Weapons and money are vital but without soldiers Ukraine cannot win a long war of attrition and Russia has an easy path to resupply. In short, Vindman is one of those career government lackeys that the West needs fewer of, not more in my opinion. We need honesty in the military and critical security agencies, non-partisan officials or political operatives.

How many hundreds of thousands of souls have been lost in wars the last four years?

1730767816575.png
 
Last edited:
Probably means he's going to troll her.
Remember, Michelle brings it out in people as time and time again she displays her disappointment in America.
 
Back
Top Bottom