Democrats created fake Russian bots to try and link Kremlin to Roy Moore

There never was any real evidence of Russian interference. The "link" to Assange is pure CIA bullshit. They can't prove it in court, and all they rely on is the "US" media saying

"all 17 intel agencies agree"

which has to beg the question

WHY DO WE HAVE 17???

One is already TOO MANY.
 
There never was any real evidence of Russian interference. The "link" to Assange is pure CIA bullshit. They can't prove it in court, and all they rely on is the "US" media saying

"all 17 intel agencies agree"

which has to beg the question

WHY DO WE HAVE 17???

One is already TOO MANY.
upload_2018-12-20_13-32-5.webp


BTW, Ukrainian officials have interfered in US elections a lot more than alleged Russians: they were trashing Trump when he was a candidate, donated money to Clinton, framed Manafort (who worked in Ukraine) to harm Trump.

The Clinton foundation is also linked directly to Ukrainian oligarchs:
Between 2009 and 2013, including when Mrs. Clinton was secretary of state, the Clinton Foundation received at least $8.6 million from the Victor Pinchuk Foundation, according to that foundation, which is based in Kiev, Ukraine. It was created by Mr. Pinchuk, whose fortune stems from a pipe-making company. He served two terms as an elected member of the Ukrainian Parliament and is a proponent of closer ties between Ukraine and the European Union.
clintonfoundationinvestigation.com
 
But it is still sad what SUBS from Bama tend to elect....

1. no patriotism to the US allowed
2. no ability to think or question
3. only 100% Bible parrots and JDAACs considered
4. no fiscal conservatives allowed
5. nobody with an IQ over 10 considered
 
There never was any real evidence of Russian interference. The "link" to Assange is pure CIA bullshit. They can't prove it in court, and all they rely on is the "US" media saying

"all 17 intel agencies agree"

which has to beg the question

WHY DO WE HAVE 17???

One is already TOO MANY.
4 intelligence agencies vs. Your zero.
 
4 intelligence agencies vs. Your zero.



ZIONIST TRAITORS really love the "X number of experts" bullshit.

Every ZIONIST FRAUD uses it, including the Global Warming one...

In comparison to what? Your hysteric ignorance backed by nothing?

I'll put our intelligence services up against your youtube video of Sly Stallone telling you what to think anyday, rube.
 
I'll put our intelligence services up against



Indeed, they are :"your" meaning ISRAEL's, and have been since....


Gen. Hugh Shelton: Clinton Official Suggested Letting U.S. Plane Be Shot Down To Provoke War With Iraq | HuffPost


In the publicity sheet that St. Martin’s Press has been sending out to spur interest in General Hugh Shelton’s new memoir, Without Hesitation: The Odyssey of an American Warrior, the last highlight is a doozy: “A high-ranking cabinet member suggests intentionally flying an American airplane on a low pass over Baghdad so as to guarantee it will be shot down, thus creating a natural excuse to reltaliate and go to war.”

Turns out the incident took place during the Clinton administration, and Shelton’s response to the suggestion...well, let’s just say it more than lives up to the title of the memoir.

Over at Salon’s War Room, Justin Elliott has the specifics.

Shelton sets the scene at a “small, weekly White House breakfast” that served as regular “informal” meetings that “encouraged brainstorming of potential options on a variety of issues.”

At one of my very first breakfasts, while Berger and Cohen were engaged in a sidebar discussion down at one end of the table and Tenet and Richardson were preoccupied in another, one of the Cabinet members present leaned over to me and said, “Hugh, I know I shouldn’t even be asking you this, but what we really need in order to go in and take out Saddam is a precipitous event — something that would make us look good in the eyes of the world. Could you have one of our U-2s fly low enough — and slow enough — so as to guarantee that Saddam could shoot it down?”

The hair on the back of my neck bristled, my teeth clenched, and my fists tightened. I was so mad I was about to explode. I looked across the table, thinking about the pilot in the U-2 and responded, “Of course we can ...” which prompted a big smile on the official’s face.

“You can?” was the excited reply.

“Why, of course we can,” I countered. “Just as soon as we get your ass qualified to fly it, I will have it flown just as low and slow as you want to go.”


Go read the whole thing.

Readers aren’t told explicitly who had this particular brainstorm, but Shelton gives you some clues. The breakfasts, he says, were attended by NSA Sandy Berger, Secretary of Defense Bill Cohen, Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, CIA Director George Tenet, Vice President Chief of Staff Leon Firth, and U.N. Ambassador Bill Richardson. If you eliminate Berger, Cohen, Tenet, and Richardson and look at the Cabinet members that remain, you’re sort of left where Elliott is: with Madeleine Albright.




which helps to explain why ISRAEL was so very for HILLARY in 2016....
 
I'll put our intelligence services up against



Indeed, they are :"your" meaning ISRAEL's, and have been since....


Gen. Hugh Shelton: Clinton Official Suggested Letting U.S. Plane Be Shot Down To Provoke War With Iraq | HuffPost


In the publicity sheet that St. Martin’s Press has been sending out to spur interest in General Hugh Shelton’s new memoir, Without Hesitation: The Odyssey of an American Warrior, the last highlight is a doozy: “A high-ranking cabinet member suggests intentionally flying an American airplane on a low pass over Baghdad so as to guarantee it will be shot down, thus creating a natural excuse to reltaliate and go to war.”

Turns out the incident took place during the Clinton administration, and Shelton’s response to the suggestion...well, let’s just say it more than lives up to the title of the memoir.

Over at Salon’s War Room, Justin Elliott has the specifics.

Shelton sets the scene at a “small, weekly White House breakfast” that served as regular “informal” meetings that “encouraged brainstorming of potential options on a variety of issues.”

At one of my very first breakfasts, while Berger and Cohen were engaged in a sidebar discussion down at one end of the table and Tenet and Richardson were preoccupied in another, one of the Cabinet members present leaned over to me and said, “Hugh, I know I shouldn’t even be asking you this, but what we really need in order to go in and take out Saddam is a precipitous event — something that would make us look good in the eyes of the world. Could you have one of our U-2s fly low enough — and slow enough — so as to guarantee that Saddam could shoot it down?”

The hair on the back of my neck bristled, my teeth clenched, and my fists tightened. I was so mad I was about to explode. I looked across the table, thinking about the pilot in the U-2 and responded, “Of course we can ...” which prompted a big smile on the official’s face.

“You can?” was the excited reply.

“Why, of course we can,” I countered. “Just as soon as we get your ass qualified to fly it, I will have it flown just as low and slow as you want to go.”


Go read the whole thing.

Readers aren’t told explicitly who had this particular brainstorm, but Shelton gives you some clues. The breakfasts, he says, were attended by NSA Sandy Berger, Secretary of Defense Bill Cohen, Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, CIA Director George Tenet, Vice President Chief of Staff Leon Firth, and U.N. Ambassador Bill Richardson. If you eliminate Berger, Cohen, Tenet, and Richardson and look at the Cabinet members that remain, you’re sort of left where Elliott is: with Madeleine Albright.




which helps to explain why ISRAEL was so very for HILLARY in 2016....

Which has nothing to do with the ONE facebook page created by a researcher. You're spamming at random now, unaware of what you're cutting and pasting.

And demonstrate yet again why you citing yourself are laughable compared to our own intelligence services.
 
There never was any real evidence of Russian interference. The "link" to Assange is pure CIA bullshit. They can't prove it in court, and all they rely on is the "US" media saying

"all 17 intel agencies agree"

which has to beg the question

WHY DO WE HAVE 17???

One is already TOO MANY.
4 intelligence agencies vs. Your zero.


Wait it went down to 4 now?


We thought it was 9

.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom