Climate science is crooked.

[Ray9]

There is certainly a lot of high intelligence and superbly developed skill in the scientific community. We all remember the eggheads in school who were east of the bell curve and eventually went off to Harvard and MIT to become scientists and engineers of our future world. But those of us of a more common thread who avoided some of the pitfalls in the human condition stacked a few decades together and acquired some wisdom.

We have kept our eyes open and learned how our world really works. We don’t reject science; we’ve seen what it can do. We recall the Manhattan Project that likely saved the free world. We understand what organized brainpower can accomplish.

We are also keenly aware that physicists, chemists and researchers in any scientific endeavor are all tethered to the same empirical, earthly realities that burden the most average citizen. They have to eat and keep a roof over their heads. They need to find employment and without funding for that employment maintaining a dignified livelihood can be a struggle.

In contemporary society there is much debate about climate change and what is causing it. There is extreme focus on fossil fuels and in particular automobile emissions that produce carbon dioxide in the upper atmosphere raising the Earth’s ambient temperature that allegedly delivers catastrophic consequences for future generations of humans.

Why is climate science being wasted on warnings about human activity? Why isn’t that science utilized for a Manhattan Project to eliminate antique, outmoded vehicle carburation that wastes kinetic energy to propel an automobile by producing heat and waste instead of clean power?

The only innovation to vehicle carburation was fuel injection in the 1980’s and that did nothing to increase gas mileage or significantly increase the efficiency of gasoline engines with respect to converting explosive energy to kinetic energy without most of it being wasted through useless heat.

It’s pretty obvious that climate science is owned lock stock and barrel by automobile manufacturers, oil companies and political entities that control them through funding. There is no inclination on the part of the established energy industry to produce automobiles that can run for a month on a cupful of gas even though the technology already exists.

If you follow the breadcrumbs of climate science funding they will lead right back to the energy industry. .

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Massive wealth redistribution scam

 

[Wuwei]

Your OP has some good points.
Automotive companies produce what sells. The sales of pickup trucks seems always to surge when gas prices become lower.
I don't see how the brightest engineers can get over that. However there is a lot of research in electric cars, fuel cells, etc. Let's see what happens with that.

 

[skookerasbil]

There is certainly a lot of high intelligence and superbly developed skill in the scientific community. We all remember the eggheads in school who were east of the bell curve and eventually went off to Harvard and MIT to become scientists and engineers of our future world. But those of us of a more common thread who avoided some of the pitfalls in the human condition stacked a few decades together and acquired some wisdom.

We have kept our eyes open and learned how our world really works. We don’t reject science; we’ve seen what it can do. We recall the Manhattan Project that likely saved the free world. We understand what organized brainpower can accomplish.

We are also keenly aware that physicists, chemists and researchers in any scientific endeavor are all tethered to the same empirical, earthly realities that burden the most average citizen. They have to eat and keep a roof over their heads. They need to find employment and without funding for that employment maintaining a dignified livelihood can be a struggle.

In contemporary society there is much debate about climate change and what is causing it. There is extreme focus on fossil fuels and in particular automobile emissions that produce carbon dioxide in the upper atmosphere raising the Earth’s ambient temperature that allegedly delivers catastrophic consequences for future generations of humans.

Why is climate science being wasted on warnings about human activity? Why isn’t that science utilized for a Manhattan Project to eliminate antique, outmoded vehicle carburation that wastes kinetic energy to propel an automobile by producing heat and waste instead of clean power?

The only innovation to vehicle carburation was fuel injection in the 1980’s and that did nothing to increase gas mileage or significantly increase the efficiency of gasoline engines with respect to converting explosive energy to kinetic energy without most of it being wasted through useless heat.

It’s pretty obvious that climate science is owned lock stock and barrel by automobile manufacturers, oil companies and political entities that control them through funding. There is no inclination on the part of the established energy industry to produce automobiles that can run for a month on a cupful of gas even though the technology already exists.

If you follow the breadcrumbs of climate science funding they will lead right back to the energy industry. .

LAUGH..........MY.......BALLS.......OFF


"eggheads in school who were east of the bell curve......."

I spit on my PC monitor from laughing so hard when I saw that..........9 years of hanging around this forum, its the best description Ive seen to describe the AGW mental cases.

 

[Old Rocks]

There is certainly a lot of high intelligence and superbly developed skill in the scientific community. We all remember the eggheads in school who were east of the bell curve and eventually went off to Harvard and MIT to become scientists and engineers of our future world. But those of us of a more common thread who avoided some of the pitfalls in the human condition stacked a few decades together and acquired some wisdom.

We have kept our eyes open and learned how our world really works. We don’t reject science; we’ve seen what it can do. We recall the Manhattan Project that likely saved the free world. We understand what organized brainpower can accomplish.

We are also keenly aware that physicists, chemists and researchers in any scientific endeavor are all tethered to the same empirical, earthly realities that burden the most average citizen. They have to eat and keep a roof over their heads. They need to find employment and without funding for that employment maintaining a dignified livelihood can be a struggle.

In contemporary society there is much debate about climate change and what is causing it. There is extreme focus on fossil fuels and in particular automobile emissions that produce carbon dioxide in the upper atmosphere raising the Earth’s ambient temperature that allegedly delivers catastrophic consequences for future generations of humans.

Why is climate science being wasted on warnings about human activity? Why isn’t that science utilized for a Manhattan Project to eliminate antique, outmoded vehicle carburation that wastes kinetic energy to propel an automobile by producing heat and waste instead of clean power?

The only innovation to vehicle carburation was fuel injection in the 1980’s and that did nothing to increase gas mileage or significantly increase the efficiency of gasoline engines with respect to converting explosive energy to kinetic energy without most of it being wasted through useless heat.

It’s pretty obvious that climate science is owned lock stock and barrel by automobile manufacturers, oil companies and political entities that control them through funding. There is no inclination on the part of the established energy industry to produce automobiles that can run for a month on a cupful of gas even though the technology already exists.

If you follow the breadcrumbs of climate science funding they will lead right back to the energy industry. .

And why do we need to fool with the internal combustion engine any further? Do you understand what the Carnot Cycle is? Obviously not. Some of the modern ICE's are very close to the efficiency limits of the internal combustion engine.

And we already have the answer to clean vehicles. Tesla, and now, many other manufactures are already making them and selling them. Wind and solar are taking the place of the fossil fuel plants even as we post. In many places now it is cheaper to close the coal fired plant and replace it with wind and solar than to continue to run the plant.

 

[Ray9]

The point I make is that climate science is under the control of oil companies and automobile manufacturers. The waste involved in internal combustion engines is a by product of converting gasoline from a liquid to a vapor state. If science can introduce gas into an engine that is already in a vapor state then the air mixture is much more pure leading to mileage efficiency and much cleaner exhaust. This isn't being done. In fact it's actively discouraged because it would devastate profits and wipe out the monopoly of the current energy industry.

Give me enough money to hire the right people and I will produce automobiles that get 100 miles to the gallon within a year. Ask yourself why no one is doing this? You wouldn't even have to redesign cars just improve or even eliminate carburation.

Electric cars are a great idea and different fuels are in our future but right now is what's important. Wind energy is a quixotic waste of time for the mass of the human race. We need to get the oil companies and the automotive industry out of the climate change business.

 

[miketx]

Fusion.

 

[Wyatt earp]

There is certainly a lot of high intelligence and superbly developed skill in the scientific community. We all remember the eggheads in school who were east of the bell curve and eventually went off to Harvard and MIT to become scientists and engineers of our future world. But those of us of a more common thread who avoided some of the pitfalls in the human condition stacked a few decades together and acquired some wisdom.

We have kept our eyes open and learned how our world really works. We don’t reject science; we’ve seen what it can do. We recall the Manhattan Project that likely saved the free world. We understand what organized brainpower can accomplish.

We are also keenly aware that physicists, chemists and researchers in any scientific endeavor are all tethered to the same empirical, earthly realities that burden the most average citizen. They have to eat and keep a roof over their heads. They need to find employment and without funding for that employment maintaining a dignified livelihood can be a struggle.

In contemporary society there is much debate about climate change and what is causing it. There is extreme focus on fossil fuels and in particular automobile emissions that produce carbon dioxide in the upper atmosphere raising the Earth’s ambient temperature that allegedly delivers catastrophic consequences for future generations of humans.

Why is climate science being wasted on warnings about human activity? Why isn’t that science utilized for a Manhattan Project to eliminate antique, outmoded vehicle carburation that wastes kinetic energy to propel an automobile by producing heat and waste instead of clean power?

The only innovation to vehicle carburation was fuel injection in the 1980’s and that did nothing to increase gas mileage or significantly increase the efficiency of gasoline engines with respect to converting explosive energy to kinetic energy without most of it being wasted through useless heat.

It’s pretty obvious that climate science is owned lock stock and barrel by automobile manufacturers, oil companies and political entities that control them through funding. There is no inclination on the part of the established energy industry to produce automobiles that can run for a month on a cupful of gas even though the technology already exists.

If you follow the breadcrumbs of climate science funding they will lead right back to the energy industry. .

And why do we need to fool with the internal combustion engine any further? Do you understand what the Carnot Cycle is? Obviously not. Some of the modern ICE's are very close to the efficiency limits of the internal combustion engine.

And we already have the answer to clean vehicles. Tesla, and now, many other manufactures are already making them and selling them. Wind and solar are taking the place of the fossil fuel plants even as we post. In many places now it is cheaper to close the coal fired plant and replace it with wind and solar than to continue to run the plant.

Lmfao, you will always need a fossil fuel plant on stand by with solar and wind.

 

[fncceo]

And why do we need to fool with the internal combustion engine any further?

Because we don’t have sufficient quantities of dilithium crystals for our antimatter engines.

 

[Old Rocks]

Tesla's big lithium ion in Australia just saved them a major power failure from Coal fired plants dropping offline with no warning, twice. That technology, combined with renewables, will replace fossil fuels.

 

[miketx]

Perhaps they can utilize miniature black holes to power cars.

 

[Old Rocks]

And why do we need to fool with the internal combustion engine any further?

Because we don’t have sufficient quantities of dilithium crystals for our antimatter engines.

But we do have;

And they all beat the pants off of the ICE's in their class.

 

[Cosmos]

Give me enough money to hire the right people and I will produce automobiles that get 100 miles to the gallon within a year.

No you won't. You're totally full of shit.

 

[Wuwei]

Give me enough money to hire the right people and I will produce automobiles that get 100 miles to the gallon within a year.

No you won't. You're totally full of shit.

VW made a concept car that broke that record 10 years ago. It was supposed to be put on the market, but I haven't seen it. Probably market research show that people weren't interested.
The World's Most Fuel Efficient Car: 285 MPG, Not A Hybrid | Gas 2

 

[Ray9]

No you won't. You're totally full of shit.

Show me the money. Imagine a car with a one gallon gas tank. The weight savings alone would be a huge advantage. You won't see it. They'll never allow it.

 

[Old Rocks]

Damn. I continue to be amazed by the people that will not even bother to look up the Carnot Cycle, or the Otto Cycle, and claim that a 100 mpg car is possible with an ICE. You simply cannot build a car that would handle modern traffic and have room for 5 people using an ICE. To get that kind of efficiency, you have to have an EV.

 

[flacaltenn]

Damn. I continue to be amazed by the people that will not even bother to look up the Carnot Cycle, or the Otto Cycle, and claim that a 100 mpg car is possible with an ICE. You simply cannot build a car that would handle modern traffic and have room for 5 people using an ICE. To get that kind of efficiency, you have to have an EV.

The power efficiency of the engine does not limit the mpg of the vehicle. WEIGHT, air and road friction do....

So all of these "super-acheiving" test concepts being tossed out here -- the 285mpg stuff -- isn't capable of hauling an extra 50lbs of groceries.

 

[westwall]

There is certainly a lot of high intelligence and superbly developed skill in the scientific community. We all remember the eggheads in school who were east of the bell curve and eventually went off to Harvard and MIT to become scientists and engineers of our future world. But those of us of a more common thread who avoided some of the pitfalls in the human condition stacked a few decades together and acquired some wisdom.

We have kept our eyes open and learned how our world really works. We don’t reject science; we’ve seen what it can do. We recall the Manhattan Project that likely saved the free world. We understand what organized brainpower can accomplish.

We are also keenly aware that physicists, chemists and researchers in any scientific endeavor are all tethered to the same empirical, earthly realities that burden the most average citizen. They have to eat and keep a roof over their heads. They need to find employment and without funding for that employment maintaining a dignified livelihood can be a struggle.

In contemporary society there is much debate about climate change and what is causing it. There is extreme focus on fossil fuels and in particular automobile emissions that produce carbon dioxide in the upper atmosphere raising the Earth’s ambient temperature that allegedly delivers catastrophic consequences for future generations of humans.

Why is climate science being wasted on warnings about human activity? Why isn’t that science utilized for a Manhattan Project to eliminate antique, outmoded vehicle carburation that wastes kinetic energy to propel an automobile by producing heat and waste instead of clean power?

The only innovation to vehicle carburation was fuel injection in the 1980’s and that did nothing to increase gas mileage or significantly increase the efficiency of gasoline engines with respect to converting explosive energy to kinetic energy without most of it being wasted through useless heat.

It’s pretty obvious that climate science is owned lock stock and barrel by automobile manufacturers, oil companies and political entities that control them through funding. There is no inclination on the part of the established energy industry to produce automobiles that can run for a month on a cupful of gas even though the technology already exists.

If you follow the breadcrumbs of climate science funding they will lead right back to the energy industry. .

And why do we need to fool with the internal combustion engine any further? Do you understand what the Carnot Cycle is? Obviously not. Some of the modern ICE's are very close to the efficiency limits of the internal combustion engine.

And we already have the answer to clean vehicles. Tesla, and now, many other manufactures are already making them and selling them. Wind and solar are taking the place of the fossil fuel plants even as we post. In many places now it is cheaper to close the coal fired plant and replace it with wind and solar than to continue to run the plant.

They are? F1 has gotten close to 50% thermal efficiency. THAT is mindbending.

 

[fncceo]

Tesla's big lithium ion in Australia just saved them a major power failure from Coal fired plants dropping offline with no warning, twice. That technology, combined with renewables, will replace fossil fuels.

The 50 million dollar system restored power to the grid for 38 minutes before switching back to the coal plant.

 

[Wyatt earp]

And why do we need to fool with the internal combustion engine any further?

Because we don’t have sufficient quantities of dilithium crystals for our antimatter engines.

But we do have;

And they all beat the pants off of the ICE's in their class.

Yea if you don't use the heater or A/C