Early in May the story about the government spying on e-mails broke:
ThereÂ’s a ton of opinions, countless video clips, and articles about the NSA spying on Americans. The coverage of that one scandal was probably doubled thanks to the questions being asked about Edward SnowdenÂ’s legal status. Is he a whistle blower? or is he a traitor? I lean toward the latter, but I havenÂ’t purchased the rope just yet.
To date, everything printed and said has been nutritious political health food instead of the governmentÂ’s fat-food the media usually feeds to the country. Barack TaqiyyaÂ’s media is still dishing out sugar-sweet crapola on the immigration bill, the ACA, the economy, infanticide, and so on.
For all the NSA’s sins I always thought e-mail snooping was the one that had the least to do with national security. E-mail snooping is pure politics for the obvious reason. The government wants to know who is copying and pasting conservative commentaries to e-mails —— and who is receiving those e-mails.
It does not take a genius to identify conservatives who publish their views online or anywhere else. Identifying the people who read those views has long been a problem for Democrats. Look closely and youÂ’ll see that the NSA has solved the problem; that is finding out who is disseminating conservative commentary by e-mail. You can bet that the information will be shared; so tracing e-mail chain letters is the most efficient way for the IRS to identify and compile lists of conservatives for the purpose of punishing them.
Research the government trying to find out who was reading which books in a public library if you doubt my take on this.
E-mail snooping will not identify and target every conservative, but it will fill a large space in an area that had been empty before the NSA and FBI began snooping. Just think how many conservatives will be scooped up in those chain e-mails that go from conservative to conservative. Hänsel and Gretel could not have devised a clearer trail to follow.
Serendipitously, Democrats can also determine who is NOT reading liberal garbage. Listing those Americans who donÂ’t get the message has been the Democrat partyÂ’s goal for decades.
"Not only does the FBI claim it can read emails and other electronic communications without a warrant — even after a federal appeals court ruled that doing so violates the Fourth Amendment — but the documents strongly suggest that different U.S. Attorneys’ offices around the country are applying conflicting standards to access communications content," he wrote.
FBI may be reading emails without a warrant
May 8, 2013 at 3:23 PM ET
FBI may be reading emails without a warrant* - NBC News.com
ThereÂ’s a ton of opinions, countless video clips, and articles about the NSA spying on Americans. The coverage of that one scandal was probably doubled thanks to the questions being asked about Edward SnowdenÂ’s legal status. Is he a whistle blower? or is he a traitor? I lean toward the latter, but I havenÂ’t purchased the rope just yet.
To date, everything printed and said has been nutritious political health food instead of the governmentÂ’s fat-food the media usually feeds to the country. Barack TaqiyyaÂ’s media is still dishing out sugar-sweet crapola on the immigration bill, the ACA, the economy, infanticide, and so on.
For all the NSA’s sins I always thought e-mail snooping was the one that had the least to do with national security. E-mail snooping is pure politics for the obvious reason. The government wants to know who is copying and pasting conservative commentaries to e-mails —— and who is receiving those e-mails.
It does not take a genius to identify conservatives who publish their views online or anywhere else. Identifying the people who read those views has long been a problem for Democrats. Look closely and youÂ’ll see that the NSA has solved the problem; that is finding out who is disseminating conservative commentary by e-mail. You can bet that the information will be shared; so tracing e-mail chain letters is the most efficient way for the IRS to identify and compile lists of conservatives for the purpose of punishing them.
Research the government trying to find out who was reading which books in a public library if you doubt my take on this.
E-mail snooping will not identify and target every conservative, but it will fill a large space in an area that had been empty before the NSA and FBI began snooping. Just think how many conservatives will be scooped up in those chain e-mails that go from conservative to conservative. Hänsel and Gretel could not have devised a clearer trail to follow.
Serendipitously, Democrats can also determine who is NOT reading liberal garbage. Listing those Americans who donÂ’t get the message has been the Democrat partyÂ’s goal for decades.