center members, voted every ?years or lifetime achievement or failure?

[trevorjohnson83]

should the center party, which basically is a healthy party that requires good health, with left and right voted in, should the center party be voted in regularly, perhaps a member stays for a lifetime if he maintains good outstanding leadership and health, but loses out to another member if sick? or should the center party be voted in like the left and right? 3 parties makes most sense to me...

 

[trevorjohnson83]

in America they might vote for either party to be central and in control of what the other two think, but central party exists on its own, so essentially that kind of thinking would be that the party voted into control would move the central party to the right or left, central party remains the central party even when moved out of power, they just wait to be voted back in again. 3 party system this way may not be preferred to just keeping the idea of the central party as the most powerful. Left and right are essential to thought, I don't know how essential, but I always had fun writing with one eye what I see in the darkness on the left as long passage to whatever word is written on my right conscious side.

 

[trevorjohnson83]

probably with improvements in health, those doctors will make the greatest members, countries being seperated will maintain there own without worrying about others for a long time with 3 party government. central party keeps a long law against using violence with many reasons.