Rust_Cohle
Diamond Member
The actual study
https://osf.io/b9t7m/
Quote
āItās in both Moderna and Pfizer. We looked at the bivalent vaccines for both Moderna and Pfizer and only the monovalent vaccines for Pfizer because we didnāt have access to monovalent vaccines for Moderna. In all three cases, the vaccines contain double-stranded DNA contamination. If you sequence that DNA, youāll find that it matches what looks to be an expression vector thatās used to make the RNAā¦
āWhenever we see DNA contamination, like from plasmids, ending up in any injectable, the first thing people think about is whether thereās any E. coli endotoxin present because that creates anaphylaxis for the injected. And, of course, your viewers and listeners are probably aware thereās a lot of anaphylaxis going on, not only on TV but in the VAERS database. You can see people get injected with this and drop. That could be the background from this E. coli process of manufacturing the DNAā¦
āAt least on the Pfizer side of things, it has whatās known as an SV40 promoter. This is an oncogenic virus piece. Itās not the entire virus. However, the small piece is known to drive very aggressive gene expression. And the concern that people, even at the FDA, have noted in the past whenever injecting double-stranded DNA is that these things can then integrate into the genome. If youāre not careful with how you manufacture these things, and you have excess amounts of this DNA, your concern for genome integration goes upā¦
āIf you get an SV40 promoter in front of an oncogene, you will end up with a high expression of a gene that can drive cancer, it will be a very rare event, but you donāt need many of these cells to be hit with something like this for it to take off. SV40 actually plagued, granted it was the full viral genome, not just the promoter, but this has plagued previous vaccine programs. The polio vaccine is one of them that they were concerned that this may have contributed to cancer from that vaccine. So, thereās a history of being concerned over SV40.
āHaving the promoter inside some of these vectors isnāt necessary. It seems to be superfluous oversight they could have eliminated, yet itās still there because they ran this out the door so quickly, they didnāt really have time to get rid of superfluous parts of the plasmid. So, that piece of DNA is something we really need to pay attention to. Weāve made quantitative PCR assays to hunt for this. So several researchers around the globe are now running these assays to look for how much of this DNA is floating around after people have been vaccinated.ā
Uh oh vaxxies??? Not looking good now. So on top of heart conditions you now run high risk of cancer. You were warned and instead you trusted Fauci and Biden. Enjoy your medical issues
https://osf.io/b9t7m/
Quote
āItās in both Moderna and Pfizer. We looked at the bivalent vaccines for both Moderna and Pfizer and only the monovalent vaccines for Pfizer because we didnāt have access to monovalent vaccines for Moderna. In all three cases, the vaccines contain double-stranded DNA contamination. If you sequence that DNA, youāll find that it matches what looks to be an expression vector thatās used to make the RNAā¦
āWhenever we see DNA contamination, like from plasmids, ending up in any injectable, the first thing people think about is whether thereās any E. coli endotoxin present because that creates anaphylaxis for the injected. And, of course, your viewers and listeners are probably aware thereās a lot of anaphylaxis going on, not only on TV but in the VAERS database. You can see people get injected with this and drop. That could be the background from this E. coli process of manufacturing the DNAā¦
āAt least on the Pfizer side of things, it has whatās known as an SV40 promoter. This is an oncogenic virus piece. Itās not the entire virus. However, the small piece is known to drive very aggressive gene expression. And the concern that people, even at the FDA, have noted in the past whenever injecting double-stranded DNA is that these things can then integrate into the genome. If youāre not careful with how you manufacture these things, and you have excess amounts of this DNA, your concern for genome integration goes upā¦
āIf you get an SV40 promoter in front of an oncogene, you will end up with a high expression of a gene that can drive cancer, it will be a very rare event, but you donāt need many of these cells to be hit with something like this for it to take off. SV40 actually plagued, granted it was the full viral genome, not just the promoter, but this has plagued previous vaccine programs. The polio vaccine is one of them that they were concerned that this may have contributed to cancer from that vaccine. So, thereās a history of being concerned over SV40.
āHaving the promoter inside some of these vectors isnāt necessary. It seems to be superfluous oversight they could have eliminated, yet itās still there because they ran this out the door so quickly, they didnāt really have time to get rid of superfluous parts of the plasmid. So, that piece of DNA is something we really need to pay attention to. Weāve made quantitative PCR assays to hunt for this. So several researchers around the globe are now running these assays to look for how much of this DNA is floating around after people have been vaccinated.ā
Uh oh vaxxies??? Not looking good now. So on top of heart conditions you now run high risk of cancer. You were warned and instead you trusted Fauci and Biden. Enjoy your medical issues
