British Advisors to Kamala Harris Hope to "Kill Musk's Twitter"

[Kevin_Kennedy]

In an explosive leak with ramifications for the upcoming U.S. presidential election, internal documents from the Center for Countering Digital Hate—whose founder is British political operative Morgan McSweeney, now advising the Kamala Harris campaign—show the group plans in writing to “kill Musk’s Twitter” while strengthening ties with the Biden/Harris administration and Democrats like Senator Amy Klobuchar, who has introduced multiple bills to regulate online “misinformation.”

The Center for Countering Digital Hate is the anti-disinformation activist ally of Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s Labour Party, and a messaging vehicle for Labour’s neoliberal think tank, Labour Together. Both the CCDH and Labour Together were founded by Morgan McSweeney, a Svengali credited with piloting Starmer’s rise to Downing Street, much as Karl Rove is credited with guiding George W. Bush to the White House.

The CCDH documents carry particular importance because McSweeney’s Labour Together operatives have been teaching election strategy to Kamala Harris and Tim Walz, leading Politico to call Labour and the Democrats “sister parties.” CCDH’s focus on “Kill Musk’s Twitter” also adds to legal questions about the nonprofit’s tax-exempt status as a 501(c)(3) organization.

Election Exclusive: British Advisors to Kamala Harris Hope to "Kill Musk's Twitter"

England, not Russia, is the culprit in a real foreign election interference story, as the leaked Stateside plans of an advisory group with close ties to Prime Minister Keir Starmer show

www.racket.news

Feel free to be outraged or dismiss as you please, but this isn't a small thing. A tax-exempt organization tied to Labour Party operatives who are now advising the Harris campaign is abusing its status to try agitate for regulations against Twitter in the US and EU.

 

[shockedcanadian]

Election Exclusive: British Advisors to Kamala Harris Hope to "Kill Musk's Twitter"

England, not Russia, is the culprit in a real foreign election interference story, as the leaked Stateside plans of an advisory group with close ties to Prime Minister Keir Starmer show

www.racket.news

Feel free to be outraged or dismiss as you please, but this isn't a small thing. A tax-exempt organization tied to Labour Party operatives who are now advising the Harris campaign is abusing its status to try agitate for regulations against Twitter in the US and EU.

The British are a shadow of their old self. These people give so much fuel for Russia and China to say "look, they are JUST like us!"

China is going to win. Who do we blame for this outcome if and when it occurs?

History has shown one constant outcome, citizens do not support nations that impose their will on them. China for all of its clamping down on citizens is still relatively speaking, going in the right direction. This leaves citizens feeling optimistic about their future.

The West is going in the opposite direction and patriotism and belief in their governments will decline accordingly.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

Censorship is the tool of tyrants

 

[BluesLegend]

Does the UK want us to kick their ass again?

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Election Exclusive: British Advisors to Kamala Harris Hope to "Kill Musk's Twitter"

England, not Russia, is the culprit in a real foreign election interference story, as the leaked Stateside plans of an advisory group with close ties to Prime Minister Keir Starmer show

www.racket.news

Feel free to be outraged or dismiss as you please, but this isn't a small thing. A tax-exempt organization tied to Labour Party operatives who are now advising the Harris campaign is abusing its status to try agitate for regulations against Twitter in the US and EU.

A Brit Twit Bitter About Twitter

 

[Missourian]

Election Exclusive: British Advisors to Kamala Harris Hope to "Kill Musk's Twitter"

England, not Russia, is the culprit in a real foreign election interference story, as the leaked Stateside plans of an advisory group with close ties to Prime Minister Keir Starmer show

www.racket.news

Feel free to be outraged or dismiss as you please, but this isn't a small thing. A tax-exempt organization tied to Labour Party operatives who are now advising the Harris campaign is abusing its status to try agitate for regulations against Twitter in the US and EU.

You ready to vote for Trump yet?

 

[Kevin_Kennedy]

You ready to vote for Trump yet?

Yes, actually. I voted for Trump already and I am very unhappy about it, I think he was and will be a terrible president. I am voting for him solely because the Democrats decided to throw out the candidate who actually won their primary and install Kamala Harris instead. I was going to do my usual and not vote since the Libertarians once again nominated a joke, but I found myself hoping that Trump beats Harris for the reason I outlined and it felt dishonest to want him to win and not vote. In 2016 I thought it would be funny if Trump beat Clinton, but I didn't care who won really. I cared even less between Trump and Biden, and even less than that between Romney and Obama. But I found myself hoping Trump won this time, so I voted for him. The Cheneys endorsing Harris made me feel better about it, but I am not happy to have voted for Trump.

 

[Missourian]

Yes, actually. I voted for Trump already and I am very unhappy about it, I think he was and will be a terrible president. I am voting for him solely because the Democrats decided to throw out the candidate who actually won their primary and install Kamala Harris instead. I was going to do my usual and not vote since the Libertarians once again nominated a joke, but I found myself hoping that Trump beats Harris for the reason I outlined and it felt dishonest to want him to win and not vote. In 2016 I thought it would be funny if Trump beat Clinton, but I didn't care who won really. I cared even less between Trump and Biden, and even less than that between Romney and Obama. But I found myself hoping Trump won this time, so I voted for him. The Cheneys endorsing Harris made me feel better about it, but I am not happy to have voted for Trump.

I had to read that first sentence three times before it sunk in.

I'm sorry you're not happy about voting for Trump...but if it's any consolation, I'm happy enough for both of us that you did.

Who knows...he may surprise you.

What could Trump realistically do that would make you pleased you voted for him?

 

[Kevin_Kennedy]

I had to read that first sentence three times before it sunk in.

I'm sorry you're not happy about voting for Trump...but if it's any consolation, I'm happy enough for both of us that you did.

Who knows...he may surprise you.

What could Trump realistically do that would make you pleased you voted for him?

Believe me, I still find it hard to believe myself. My vote really doesn't matter, Ohio is going for Trump regardless, but sitting on my high horse not voting so that I can say that I didn't vote for Trump while I'm hoping he wins felt like a lie. I mean I'm not losing sleep over it or anything, I just don't like it.

I mean, he didn't start a new war in his first administration, which was good, but he did assassinate an Iranian general and arm Ukraine which is one of the reasons they're currently at war right now with Russia. My favorite thing he did was to attempt diplomacy with North Korea, but he couldn't outmaneuver his own administration on that so it failed completely. What can he do? I don't know, any number of things. Diplomacy with North Korea, diplomacy with Iran, telling Ukraine and Israel if they want to fight wars they can fund them themselves. Those would be at the top of my list I guess. What would make me pleased that I voted for him? Well, if he wins I guess I'll be pleased because I genuinely want Harris to lose, though not because I think she's that much worse on the issues than Trump is. I just think that nominees being installed by party power-brokers, at least as overtly as this case was, is a bridge too far. But I know what you mean. Not to do a "cult of personality" but to put it as simply as possible: He'd have to turn into Ron Paul or a principled libertarian for me to be pleased to have voted for him. I don't expect that, and it's not a standard I'll hold him to, but having voted for him I do intend to hold him accountable, which amounts to whining about what he does online. But what I mean by that is a lot of people will vote for someone and then think they have to defend everything that person does. I feel the opposite. If anything, if I vote for someone it's my responsibility to be as critical as possible of that person.

Sorry for the book, but I have very complicated feelings on the matter.

 

[Natural Citizen]

If anything, if I vote for someone it's my responsibility to be as critical as possible of that person.

Indeed.

That's what patriotism actually means. But you already know that, clearly.

That's another term that gets invoked very arbitrarily these days, though. Most often by people who, as you correctly stated, will vote for someone and then think they have to defend everything that person does.

That's the precise opposite of patriotism.

 

[Kevin_Kennedy]

Indeed.

That's what patriotism actually means. But you already know that, clearly.

That's another term that gets invoked very arbitrarily these days, though. Most often by people who, as you correctly stated, will vote for someone and then think they have to defend everything that person does.

That's the precise offosite of patriotism.

I don't know about all of that, but what I would say is I just get bored of talking to people who talk about politics as if they're the ones running for office or as if they're part of the campaign team. There's no reason for it. You can admit that someone you're supporting is a liar on X or is wrong on Y but you're supporting them anyway because Z. That's more interesting than this nonsense where everyone talks in partisan slogans.

 

[Natural Citizen]

In-line with the nature of the OP...

 

[Kevin_Kennedy]

In-line with the nature of the OP...

The State is the enemy of the people.

 

[Missourian]

Believe me, I still find it hard to believe myself. My vote really doesn't matter, Ohio is going for Trump regardless, but sitting on my high horse not voting so that I can say that I didn't vote for Trump while I'm hoping he wins felt like a lie. I mean I'm not losing sleep over it or anything, I just don't like it.

I mean, he didn't start a new war in his first administration, which was good, but he did assassinate an Iranian general and arm Ukraine which is one of the reasons they're currently at war right now with Russia. My favorite thing he did was to attempt diplomacy with North Korea, but he couldn't outmaneuver his own administration on that so it failed completely. What can he do? I don't know, any number of things. Diplomacy with North Korea, diplomacy with Iran, telling Ukraine and Israel if they want to fight wars they can fund them themselves. Those would be at the top of my list I guess. What would make me pleased that I voted for him? Well, if he wins I guess I'll be pleased because I genuinely want Harris to lose, though not because I think she's that much worse on the issues than Trump is. I just think that nominees being installed by party power-brokers, at least as overtly as this case was, is a bridge too far. But I know what you mean. Not to do a "cult of personality" but to put it as simply as possible: He'd have to turn into Ron Paul or a principled libertarian for me to be pleased to have voted for him. I don't expect that, and it's not a standard I'll hold him to, but having voted for him I do intend to hold him accountable, which amounts to whining about what he does online. But what I mean by that is a lot of people will vote for someone and then think they have to defend everything that person does. I feel the opposite. If anything, if I vote for someone it's my responsibility to be as critical as possible of that person.

Sorry for the book, but I have very complicated feelings on the matter.

A good answer.

I thinks it's pretty long odds on Trump becoming Ron Paul.

I suspect and fear the warmongers will do their best to set a larger war footing in place before Trump's inauguration.

Peace in Ukraine and the continuance of diplomacy with North Korea would also be wonderful Trump policies.

I'd even support serious negotiations with Iran.


Also, se should have made Russia an ally when we had the chance in the late 90s. But TBH I'm only staking out that position in hindsight...at the time I was in uniform studying Soviet Order of Battle and Tactics.

We're going to have to agree to disagree on Israel.

 

[Augustine_]

Election Exclusive: British Advisors to Kamala Harris Hope to "Kill Musk's Twitter"

England, not Russia, is the culprit in a real foreign election interference story, as the leaked Stateside plans of an advisory group with close ties to Prime Minister Keir Starmer show

www.racket.news

Feel free to be outraged or dismiss as you please, but this isn't a small thing. A tax-exempt organization tied to Labour Party operatives who are now advising the Harris campaign is abusing its status to try agitate for regulations against Twitter in the US and EU.

Elon's already killing twitter so the Brits can relax and worry about other things

 

[Kevin_Kennedy]

A good answer.

I thinks it's pretty long odds on Trump becoming Ron Paul.

I suspect and fear the warmongers will do their best to set a larger war footing in place before Trump's inauguration.

Peace in Ukraine and the continuance of diplomacy with North Korea would also be wonderful Trump policies.

I'd even support serious negotiations with Iran.


Also, se should have made Russia an ally when we had the chance in the late 90s. But TBH I'm only staking out that position in hindsight...at the time I was in uniform studying Soviet Order of Battle and Tactics.

We're going to have to agree to disagree on Israel.

Trump's instincts are generally not that bad, but the people he surrounds himself with are among the worst. The guy who says he only hires the best people hired John Bolton. That's insane. But I don't expect I'll be happier with Trump 47 than I was with Trump 45, but I voted for him. I was really hoping the Libertarians wouldn't nominate a clown this year but what can you do?

EDIT: I should clarify, his foreign policy instincts are generally not that bad. His economics are nonsense.

 

[Missourian]

Trump's instincts are generally not that bad, but the people he surrounds himself with are among the worst. The guy who says he only hires the best people hired John Bolton. That's insane. But I don't expect I'll be happier with Trump 47 than I was with Trump 45, but I voted for him. I was really hoping the Libertarians wouldn't nominate a clown this year but what can you do?

I watched the libertarian convention for the first time this year... Most due to Trump's speaking engagement.

It was... Interesting.

 

[Kevin_Kennedy]

I watched the libertarian convention for the first time this year... Most due to Trump's speaking engagement.

It was... Interesting.

I don't profess to have seen it all or even most of it, but my understanding is it was less of clown-show than usual. I forget which year the man streaked naked across the stage but that it happened once feels like too many times. But that's a low bar so I understand you completely. I've never been a member of the Libertarian Party, despite being a supporter here and there. I went to a local LP meeting well over a decade ago now, and it wasn't for me to say the least. God bless the people dressed like the Matrix with pink hair, but that's not the libertarianism I'm interested in.