I know a lot of people have a problem with the way the poor would be treated in a libertarian society...
Not other libertarians. When government gets out of the way, the poor find work. The best way to help the poor is to give them a job, which only a free market can do with any semblance of efficiency and fairness.
We had no social welfare programs for more than the first half of our country's existence. During that time, more poor became middle class and more middle class became rich than at any point in the history of mankind. Central planners thought they could do better. They were wrong.
would you be more interested in a libertarian society if it was like this?
No.
I have caught flack for my hate of rich snobs making millions while their employees need government help to get by
You caught flack because you blame the wrong group. Employees that need government help are in that position because of the very government they rely upon. For example, the Fed causing unending inflation is the most regressive tax of all. Constantly rising prices due to the Fed's central price controls has far more to do with employees unable to make ends meet than any rich guy. In addition, heavy regulations, government support of unions, and other costly employment requirements have pushed good paying jobs overseas...a sad requirement to compete in global markets. That's also the fault of government, not the rich man.
Further, please don't make the mistake of assuming that because one person makes money, another must make less. Wealth is not a finite pile of cash from which we all must draw. Similarly, a fat man standing next to a skinny one didn't necessarily take the skinny guy's food!
Lastly, to the extent the 'rich snob' was made so by loopholes and special favors in law, you're better off blaming the government bureaucrats and politicians that meddled outside of their constitutionally limited powers. The businessman is always willing to maximize shareholder wealth if government meddlers are willing to engage in cronyism...that will never change. The Constitution was supposed to limit where cronyism could even be contemplated. Time to return those limitations to the central planners. It worked beautifully until the people allowed themselves to be suckered into allowing selective meddling.
I am an anarchist without a doubt but this seems to fit me better than Anarcho Capitalist does...who else agrees with this ideology?
I do not. Whatever you call it, advocating for welfare programs only makes the problem of poverty worse. Witness the steady decline of Americas poverty rate until the late 1960s. After we began spending big on welfare, the poverty rate stopped falling and leveled off. Today, it's HIGHER than it was before all the spending. That's right, welfare has cause more harm than good.
Further, "social justice" is nothing more than a bullshit term for forced redistribution. Pass.
I grew up poor and I am poor now myself....I have learned to do what I can with what I have to the best of my ability but sometimes its just not enough...
Yet you would be considered rich by world poverty standards.
Further, whatever choices you made in your life that prevent you and your wife from making a better living should not be the burden of others. Stated differently,a lack of proper planning on your part does not constitute an emergency on mine.
That you can't afford what you used to is the fault of the Federal Reserve and government meddling. Direct your ire to the source of the problem.
Me and my wife literally if things stay the same this year she will end up with a gross pay of around 10k me with about 8,400$ and we barely scrape by.
This does not warrant stealing from others, even if government officials do it for you.
..I can see why most people don't think libertarianism would work because of its disdain for the poor.
Libertarians do not disdain the poor. We're happy to help the poor on a VOLUNTARY basis. We're happy to help the poor by providing all the jobs we can justify. We're happy to help the poor by supporting the remove of government programs and policies that keep the poor poor.
..you can't just shut people off from getting help...
True, but as our society proved for over 150 years, people get help more efficiently and with far better outcomes through VOLUNTARY actions. Government forcing some to labor on the behalf of others is akin to economic slavery...and that is never justified, particularly when "getting help" means the problems for the poor get worse over time, not better.
great minds on the same track.
