Biden Is Part Of The DOJ's Investigation Into Illegal Russian Collusion Scandal Against President Trump - Conflict of Interest

[JimH52]

Any attempt by Biden to end, silence, prevent a final report on Durham's criminal investigation into the scandal he himself was part of, being VP at the time and having proven to have known about / been part of it, would be a criminal conflict of interest.


Durham continues to investigate whether the FBI, Justice Department and Obama administration officials knowingly used the patently false allegations of Trump-Russian collusion to launch an intelligence campaign against the Republican 2016 presidential candidate.

Conducting electronic surveillance under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act and deploying federal investigatory resources on false grounds is not only unprecedented (aside from President Richard Nixon in Watergate), but illegal.

Biden is not just considering whether to hire some of the officials who may have started the unfounded Russia investigation. The president-elect himself may have personal involvement.

On January 5, 2017, while the Obama administration was winding down and the Trump administration was preparing to enter office, then-Vice President Biden attended a White House meeting with President Obama where they discussed surveillance of Michael Flynn, Trump’s incoming national security adviser, with Acting Attorney General Sally Yates and Comey.

The officials were worried that Flynn had passed classified information in conversations with the Russian ambassador about economic sanctions. According to FBI notes of the meeting, Biden may have raised the idea that Flynn had violated the Logan Act, a law enacted in 1799 that makes it a crime for a private citizen to interfere with U.S. foreign policy. But the Logan Act has never served as the basis for a successful prosecution because it likely violates the right to free speech.

Critics claim that Biden raised the Logan Act as a pretext to investigate Flynn for political dirt to handicap the incoming Trump administration.

Contrary to claims that the Durham probe represents political score-settling on the part of Barr, several investigations have already shown that Obama intelligence and law enforcement officials abused the government’s broad surveillance powers to investigate the Trump campaign.

John Yoo: AG Barr support for special counsel backed by surprise Democratic author of 1987 law review article

In 1987, a prominent Democratic U.S. senator wrote a strong argument in favor of appointing special counsels like the one Attorney General William Barr has appointed to investigate the origins of the Trump-Russia collusion probe.

www.foxnews.com

BDS!

Mueller was required to give Rod Rosenstein regular reports on his activities. Rosenstein could have shut it down if he thought it wasn't going anywhere. Should be the same deal with Durham and the new AG.

I couldn't give a damn about your OPINION - Provide any evidence that it is NOT.

WOW! That is what we have been saying about the voter fraud LIE....and you got NOTHING!

 

[jknowgood]

Patients, we can impeach him for any reason, and you loons set the bar that low.

Who is “we”? And does it include Nancy Pelosi?

Yes, and you trying to tell me you didn't support impeaching Trump?

Dude begged to be impeached.

He asked about Biden’s illegal doings. He didn't deserve shit.

Yep. His request was so legitimate he engaged in a massive cover up. Cool.

What did he cover up? He released the transcript of the call. Maybe we should get the transcripts to Biden’s calls to ukraine.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

I expect the new AG will wait about 15 minutes before he goes to Durham and asks to see the "evidence" he's "gathered". I would. There has to be a legitimate reason for initiating this snipe hunt. And Barr (unlike Rod Rosenstein) hasn't provided any. Durham's work is being conducted in a vacuum. So far, all this looks like is Barr's attempt at leaving behind a poison pill for the new AG to elevate Durham to a position where it would make it hard for an incoming AG to can him.

You talk about evidence????......LOLOL

Yes. Evidence. Like the current election fraud fiasco, I've seen nothing from Durham's snipe hunt that might qualify as actionable.

 

[Skylar]

Any attempt by Biden to end, silence, prevent a final report on Durham's criminal investigation into the scandal he himself was part of, being VP at the time and having proven to have known about / been part of it, would be a criminal conflict of interest.


Durham continues to investigate whether the FBI, Justice Department and Obama administration officials knowingly used the patently false allegations of Trump-Russian collusion to launch an intelligence campaign against the Republican 2016 presidential candidate.

Conducting electronic surveillance under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act and deploying federal investigatory resources on false grounds is not only unprecedented (aside from President Richard Nixon in Watergate), but illegal.

Biden is not just considering whether to hire some of the officials who may have started the unfounded Russia investigation. The president-elect himself may have personal involvement.

On January 5, 2017, while the Obama administration was winding down and the Trump administration was preparing to enter office, then-Vice President Biden attended a White House meeting with President Obama where they discussed surveillance of Michael Flynn, Trump’s incoming national security adviser, with Acting Attorney General Sally Yates and Comey.

The officials were worried that Flynn had passed classified information in conversations with the Russian ambassador about economic sanctions. According to FBI notes of the meeting, Biden may have raised the idea that Flynn had violated the Logan Act, a law enacted in 1799 that makes it a crime for a private citizen to interfere with U.S. foreign policy. But the Logan Act has never served as the basis for a successful prosecution because it likely violates the right to free speech.

Critics claim that Biden raised the Logan Act as a pretext to investigate Flynn for political dirt to handicap the incoming Trump administration.

Contrary to claims that the Durham probe represents political score-settling on the part of Barr, several investigations have already shown that Obama intelligence and law enforcement officials abused the government’s broad surveillance powers to investigate the Trump campaign.

John Yoo: AG Barr support for special counsel backed by surprise Democratic author of 1987 law review article

In 1987, a prominent Democratic U.S. senator wrote a strong argument in favor of appointing special counsels like the one Attorney General William Barr has appointed to investigate the origins of the Trump-Russia collusion probe.

www.foxnews.com

Biden doesn't fire the special counsel. That's a decision made by the Attorney General.

 

[HaShev]

 

[easyt65]

Patients, we can impeach him for any reason, and you loons set the bar that low.

Who is “we”? And does it include Nancy Pelosi?

Yes, and you trying to tell me you didn't support impeaching Trump?

Dude begged to be impeached.

He asked about Biden’s illegal doings. He didn't deserve shit.

Yep. His request was so legitimate he engaged in a massive cover up. Cool.

What did he cover up? He released the transcript of the call. Maybe we should get the transcripts to Biden’s calls to ukraine.

Schiff was caught illegally manufacturing and attempting to submit false evidence as legitimate evidence. FBI documents show the FBI Obstructed Justice by withholding evidencethat proved the President was justified / innocent.

4 years of violations of Constitution and Law ... this is just one of the many.