Bad News for Moscow 🇷🇺 imperialism, "Harris would be 'more aggressive' than Biden in supporting Ukraine" ex-US ambassador says.

Litwin

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2017
Messages
56,822
Reaction score
8,372
Points
1,915
Location
GDL&Sweden
Would be hard to be less aggressive...but Yes. Seems to me there should be more explicit emphasis that US/EU support for Ukraine is a national security issue, not a “foreign aid” issue.





 
Would be hard to be less aggressive...but Yes. Seems to me there should be more explicit emphasis that US/EU support for Ukraine is a national security issue, not a “foreign aid” issue.








Don't overestimate, you may be sadly mistaken.

If she wins, the key will be avoiding WWIII and preventing China from expanding further.

This isn't a game. Trump won't abandon Ukraine, he will seek to find alternatives and that means Europe will be doing heavy lifting.

I also believe if negotiations don't go fairly, Trump will allow Ukraine to use long range weapons. It's just in Trumps nature if the situation goes south. He understands that Russia has nukes. Even the use of a minor nuke is really bad news for the world.

Regardless, we don't need WWIII. Russia has spent alot of military vehicles but if they end up decimating the state of Ukraine and take over all of the land, it will be a travesty of immense proportions.
 
East of the Dneiper becomes Russia, everything west belongs to Blackrock
 
using water 🇨🇳 cannons :auiqs.jpg:? i dont think so ... you know i like you , but "China expanding further." is a MAGA myth.





ps




You don't appreciate the beautiful logic of Chinas approach.

They don't want to have to go to war. They worry about their party being unpopular.

When and if they do, it will be for keeps. They've said it openly that they would be willing to accept the loss of 800M of their citizens in a nuclear war. Think about that.
 
You don't appreciate the beautiful logic of Chinas approach.

They don't want to have to go to war. They worry about their party being unpopular.

When and if they do, it will be for keeps. They've said it openly that they would be willing to accept the loss of 800M of their citizens in a nuclear war. Think about that.
my friend, do you follow the leading military strategist Edward Luttwak ? its a short video

Nuclear war unlikely despite Russia's threats, says military strategy guru Edward Luttwak​


 
East of the Dneiper becomes Russia, everything west belongs to Blackrock

no, everything South of Moscow belongs Mongolia
Mongol-empire.webp
 
East of the Dneiper becomes Russia, everything west belongs to Blackrock
Moscow 🇷🇺 horde´s war record :-1856 defeated by Britain and France1905 defeated by Japan1917 defeated by Germany1920 defeated by Poland, Finland, Estonia and all Baltic states 1939 defeated by Finland1969 defeated by China1989 defeated by Afghanistan 1989 defeated in the Cold War. 1996 defeated by Chechnya 2022 defeated by UkraineWW2 won USA/Britain , meanwhile Stalin's officers were shot or sent to the Gulags. Millions went to the Gulags, including Solzhenitsyn

Moscow's only victories come from invading smaller countries :-a) Hungary 1956b) Czechoslovakia 1968c) Moldova 1992d) Georgia 2008
 
Back
Top Bottom