DennisPTate
Gold Member
- Nov 6, 2025
- 2,922
- 1,127
- 163
Are ordinary Palestinians being used to play the role of "sacrificial pawns" by powerful people who were working out of Russia?
Are ordinary Palestinians working to assist Atheists in Russia win against Jews in Israel and against Christians in America?
Isn't this sort of thing somewhat against many Sura's in the Koran?
Here is a writing by 1992 near death experiencer Robert Mendelson who was shown a way to give a One State Solution to the Israeli - Palestinian conflict.
His booklet has already been translated into Arabic and Hebrew by some of his supporters.
Are ordinary Palestinians working to assist Atheists in Russia win against Jews in Israel and against Christians in America?
Isn't this sort of thing somewhat against many Sura's in the Koran?
In a August 24, 2006 article entitled, "Russian Footprints", Ion Mihai Pacepa writes:
By the end of the 1960s, the KGB was deeply involved in mass terrorism against Jews, carried out by various Palestinian client organizations. Here are some terrorist actions for which the KGB took credit while I was still in Romania: November 1969, armed attack on the El Al office in Athens, leaving 1 dead and 14 wounded; May 30, 1972, Ben Gurion Airport attack, leaving 22 dead and 76 wounded; December 1974, Tel Aviv movie theater bomb, leaving 2 dead and 66 wounded; March 1975, attack on a Tel Aviv hotel, leaving 25 dead and 6 wounded; May 1975, Jerusalem bomb, leaving 1 dead and 3 wounded; July 4, 1975, bomb in Zion Square, Jerusalem, leaving 15 dead and 62 wounded; April 1978, Brussels airport attack, leaving 12 wounded; May 1978, attack on an El Al plane in Paris, leaving 12 wounded. ... In 1972, the Kremlin decided to turn the whole Islamic world against Israel and the U.S. As KGB chairman Yury Andropov told me, a billion adversaries could inflict far greater damage on America than could a few millions. We needed to instill a Nazi-style hatred for the Jews throughout the Islamic world, and to turn this weapon of the emotions into a terrorist bloodbath against Israel and its main supporter, the United States. No one within the American/Zionist sphere of influence should any longer feel safe.
- 1970 - Yasser Arafat, the father of modern terrorism:
In 1970 the Kremlin became interested in an obscure Arab construction engineer and collector of racecars, named Rahman al-Qudwa. Evidence shows, contrary to later claims, that this "construction engineer" was an Egyptian, born in Cairo during the summer of 1929. Rahman graduated from the University of Cairo and served as an officer in the Egyptian Army during the 1956 Suez campaign. Later he set up a business in Kuwait and made a fortune. He then entered politics, founding a hopelessly small terrorist organization.... According to the former head of Romanian intelligence, Lt. Gen. Ion Mihai Pacepa, one of the highest ranking communist defectors of all time, Rahman al-Qudwa became an important political ally of the communist bloc following the death of Egypt's president, Gamal Abdul Nasser, in 1970. Gen. Pacepa's account of Rahman's intimate relations with the communist bloc is related in a book entitled "Red Horizons."... Rahman al-Qudwa is better known as Yasser Arafat, the chairman of the PLO since 1968 and the president of the Palestinian Authority -- which is now at war with Israel. According to Gen. Pacepa's account, communist dictator Nicolae Ceausescu ordered his people to bring Arafat over to Romania. In late 1970 the chief of Romanian intelligence in Egypt, Gen. Constantine Munteanu, arrived in Bucharest with Arafat in tow. Munteanu had gathered an extensive file on Arafat, which characterized the PLO leader as "so much cleverness, blood, and filth all together in one man." Pacepa says that this was Munteanu's "standard definition of Arafat."![]()
Given Gen. Munteanu's extensive file, Arafat could not exactly refuse the communist's "friendly" overtures. There is little question that Arafat is fanatically devoted to destroying Israel, and would sell his soul to the devil to gain his devilish ends. Therefore, a compact between Arafat and the Soviet Union via communist Romania was not something that violated any sacred Islamic rule in Arafat's heart. Arafat is no Moslem. His fanaticism is completely secular. But since he operates within the Islamic world, he must sometimes appear as a would-be Muslim liberator. (“Kremlin puppets and how they work,” J.R. Nyquist, October 19, 2000) (read also Our Lady of the Roses prophecy about one who would come out of Egypt...)
- 1972 - According to Ion Mihai Pacepa, “In 1972, the Kremlin decided to turn the whole Islamic world against Israel and the U.S. As KGB chairman Yury Andropov … [said], a billion adversaries could inflict far greater damage on America than could a few millions. We needed to instill Nazi-style hatred for the Jews throughout the Islamic world, and to turn this weapon … against Israel and its main supporter, the United States.”
- 1973 - Soviet statements and preparations for an attack against Israel led the Pentagon to order U.S. nuclear forces to the highest state of peacetime readiness. The Joint Chiefs of Staff ordered the 82nd Airborne Division to prepare to head to the Middle East, and additional U.S. naval forces -- including American aircraft carriers -- moved into the Mediterranean, all out of a real and rising concern that the Soviets were about to make an unprecedented military move against Israel.
- 1982 - Israeli forces battling PLO terrorists in southern Lebanon unexpectedly uncovered a secret but massive cache of Soviet weaponry in deep underground cellars and tunnels. The storehouses contained some 4,000 tons of ammunition, 144 armored vehicles and tanks, 12,500 pieces of small arms, and 515 heavy weapons. Then-Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin said that the Russians had prepositioned enough weapons to "equip not five brigades, but five or six [Soviet] divisions," adding that "we shall need literally thousands of trucks to evacuate these weapons from Lebanon."
Unconverted Russia and its influence on the Mideast
Osama bin Laden's deputy issued a worldwide call today for Muslims to rise up in holy war against Israel and join the fighting in Lebanon and Gaza, until Islam reigns from "Spain to Iraq". Ayman al-Zawahiri warned that al-Qaida would not stand "idly by, humiliated", as Israeli "shells burn our...www.tldm.org
Here is a writing by 1992 near death experiencer Robert Mendelson who was shown a way to give a One State Solution to the Israeli - Palestinian conflict.
His booklet has already been translated into Arabic and Hebrew by some of his supporters.
[Robert Mendelson] :
http://godspeaceplan.org/books-download-page/
Book DownloadsGod's Peace Plan for the Holy Land and Others
Downloads Available
Left click on version to open and read.
Right click and save link to download to your computer.
Title Version
God's Peace Plan Arabic God's Peace Plan Arabic Version (final)
God's Peace Plan English God's Peace Plan for the Holy Land
God's Peace Plan Hebrew God's Peace Plan Hebrew Version (final)
Way of Holiness and the Sacred Hoop Way of Holiness & the Sacred Hoop
What's Going On in the Holy Land What_s Going On In The Holy Land
Map of the Holy Land Map of the Holy Land
Map of the Holy Land Map of the Holy Land (Arabic & Hebrew)
God's Peace Plan
for the Holy Land
A Peace Plan for Israel/Palestine
conforming to guidelines from the Bible and Qur’an
presented by
Robert Leon Mendelson
Copyright December 2010.
......
Preface
“God’s Peace for the Holy Land*”? Isn’t that a presumptuous title? Please allow
me to explain. First, since the sacred books of Judaism, Christianity and Islam
provide the guidelines supporting this solution, and since I wasn’t the one who
wrote them, calling them “God’s” seems fair. That’s why the words “presented by”
precede my name on the title page. Second, this book in no way proselytizes or
puts one religion above another. Nor does it openly or subtly encourage anyone to
convert to anything. What it does is take into account something without which
attaining peace in the Holy Land (Israel/Palestine) will forever be unattainable.
That “something” is the sacred messages delivered to each of the peoples involved
in the dispute. In this case, referencing the sacred books is more than some dry,
scholarly exercise or even a gesture of courtesy. Without taking the sacred books
into account, peace in the Holy Land will be near, if not completely, impossible.
What it boils down to is this: there are two groups of people, Palestinians and
Ashkenazi Jews (a.k.a. “Khazars”/“Eastern European Jews”) living in the Holy Land
and who appear to be genetically unrelated. In general, the belief systems
(religions) of both groups seem to direct them to subjugate and/or expel the other
group based on their being alien interlopers. Since millions of participants believe
this, and because their beliefs lead to acts of violence, finding a solution that
permits peace requires referencing their sacred literature.
Some may say the conflict has nothing to do with religion, but if this were so,
Jews wouldn’t claim “God gave us this land”. There’d be no point in doing so if it
had no importance to people. And Iran, a Persian nation, would have little interest
in a conflict concerning Semitic peoples several hundred miles away. It’s the
religious connection that brings Muslims of diverse backgrounds together in
support of Palestinians. Nor would millions of American Christians support Israel
without that support based on how they’re taught to read their Bibles." (Robert Mendelson)
Next, we come to Islam and most Palestinians.
Sura 29:46;
Sura 2:136;Dispute not…with people of the Book;
And say ye, "We believe in what hath been sent down to us [Qur’an]
and what hath been sent down to you. [Old & New Testaments]
Our God and your God is one,..."
There are many other instances in which Muhammad told his people thatSay ye: "We believe in God,
and that which hath been sent down to us [Qur’an],
and that which hath been sent down to Abraham
and Ishmael and Isaac and Jacob and the tribes [Joshua],
and in that was given to Moses, and to Jesus,
and that which was given to the prophets, from their Lord.
No difference do we make between any of them."
the books of the Bible were confirmed. Again, one can argue theology, but
Muslims have a choice as to whether they wish to read the Qur’an for life or
for death. Making use of the Old Testament for a solution meant for the
members of both tribes currently in the Holy Land in no way places Muslims
in other lands under any constraints in their own land. The following passage
is quite specific regarding the value of the Old Testament—properly applied;
Sura 46:12;
“glad tidings” to “doers of good”. Muslims are supposed to be “doers of good”.But before the Koran was the Book of Moses, a rule and a mercy;
and this Book confirmeth it (the Pentateuch)—in the Arabic tongue—
that those who are guilty of that wrong may be warned,
and as glad tidings to the doers of good."
Using Old Testament Law for the descendents of those it was originally given to
in the same land in which it was originally received doesn’t violate shariah in the
least. Muhammad recited a verse including a reference to David (from the Bible)
Sura 6:85;
David said something pertinent to the situation:And we gave him Isaac and Jacob, and guided both aright;
and We had guided…among the descendants of Abraham, David …”
Psalm 19:9-11, David;
And last, an Old Testament prophecy of particular interest for Muslims9…The ordinances of the LORD are sure and altogether righteous.
10 They are more precious than gold, than much pure gold;
they are sweeter than honey, than honey from the comb.
11 By them is your servant warned;
in keeping them there is great reward.”
throughout the Middle East from Isaiah…
Isaiah 19:25;
The LORD Almighty will bless them, saying,
"Blessed be Egypt my people, Assyria [Iraq] my handiwork,
and Israel my inheritance."
There is value for all people to make use of this wonderful tool for peace.
Without it, well, the next two passages sum up what Muslims will do.
The first passage explains how the situation in the Holy Land is seen by
Muslims worldwide and how it effects their relations with America.
Sura 60:7-9;
Palestinians weren’t allowed to return to their homes after the war in 1948.7 God will, perhaps, establish good will between yourselves
and those of them whom ye take to be your enemies:
God is powerful: and God is gracious, merciful.
8 God doth not forbid you to deal with kindness and fairness
towards those who have not made war upon you on account of your religion,
or driven you forth from your homes:
for God loveth those who act with fairness.
9 Only doth God forbid you to make friends of those who,
on account of your religion,
have warred against you,
and have driven you forth from your homes,
and have aided [America & the West] those [Israel] whom drove you forth:
and whoever maketh friends of them are wrongdoers."
Then, after the 1967 war, more Palestinians were displaced. The majority of
Palestinians are Muslims, and whether rightly or wrongly, injustices committed
by Israel against Palestinians are perceived as injustices against Muslims as a
religion. According to this belief, verse 9 forbids all Muslims from making peace
with either Israel or anyone who supports Israel until this issue is resolved.
To understand what this next one is saying, understand that when Jews follow
the Torah and Old Testament, they’re included as “faithful”, too.
Sura 49:9-10;
The command to Muslims is for un-ending war until all parties abide by the9 If two bodies of the faithful are at war,
then make ye peace between them;
and if one of them wrong the other,
fight against that party which doth the wrong,
until they come back to the precepts of God;
if they come back, make peace between them with fairness,
and act impartially; God loveth those who act with impartiality.
10 Only the faithful [those who obey God's statutes] are brethren;
wherefore make peace between your brethren;
and fear God, that ye may obtain mercy."
“precepts of God”. For Israelites, the precepts for sharing the land were placed
in the Old Testament. There was no need for covenants regarding land sharing
in the Holy Land to be duplicated in the Qur’an. Nor does referencing them in
any way make a Muslim disobedient to God. On the contrary—it enables them
to receive God’s mercy." (Robert Mendelson)
